• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局部治疗淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的差异。

Disparities in the Receipt of Local Treatment of Node-positive Prostate Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Oct;15(5):563-569.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.clgc.2016.10.011
PMID:28462857
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We sought to determine whether any sociodemographic disparities are present in the receipt of local treatment for node-positive prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 9771 patients with clinical N1M0 prostate cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2012 using the National Cancer Database. We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to identify patient-specific factors that were associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving prostate or pelvic radiation or radical prostatectomy. We also used Cox regression modeling to estimate the differences in overall survival (OS) using these factors.

RESULTS

The factors associated with a reduced likelihood of receiving local therapy included black race versus white race (43.6% vs. 49.4%; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.76; P = .001), bottom income quartile versus top quartile (44.7% vs. 52.7%; AOR, 0.69; P = .001), age > 66 years versus ≤ 66 years (40.8% vs. 55.1%; AOR, 0.48; P < .001), diagnosis before 2005 versus after 2005 (30.5% vs. 61.7%; AOR, 0.66; P < .001), and Medicaid or no insurance versus private insurance (41.0% vs. 49.4%; AOR, 0.41; P < .001). Although patients had reduced 5-year OS if they were from lower income quartiles (adjusted hazard ratios [AHRs], 1.18-1.22; P < .05), were older (AHR, 1.82; P < .001), or had Medicaid or no insurance (AHR, 1.24; P = .032), these disparities were no longer present or were smaller in magnitude after adjustment for receipt of local treatment.

CONCLUSION

Significant treatment disparities exist in the receipt of local therapy for node-positive prostate cancer. Given the accumulating evidence supporting this practice, the factors underlying these disparities should be studied and addressed.

摘要

简介

我们试图确定在接受局部治疗的 N 阳性前列腺癌患者中是否存在社会人口统计学差异。

患者和方法

我们使用国家癌症数据库,从 1998 年至 2012 年,确定了 9771 名临床 N1M0 前列腺癌患者。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型,确定与接受前列腺或盆腔放疗或根治性前列腺切除术可能性降低相关的患者特定因素。我们还使用 Cox 回归模型,根据这些因素估计总生存(OS)的差异。

结果

与接受局部治疗可能性降低相关的因素包括黑种人种族而非白种人种族(43.6% vs. 49.4%;调整后优势比 [AOR],0.76;P =.001),收入最低四分位数而非最高四分位数(44.7% vs. 52.7%;AOR,0.69;P =.001),年龄>66 岁而非≤66 岁(40.8% vs. 55.1%;AOR,0.48;P <.001),诊断于 2005 年之前而非之后(30.5% vs. 61.7%;AOR,0.66;P <.001),以及医疗补助或无保险而非私人保险(41.0% vs. 49.4%;AOR,0.41;P <.001)。尽管来自较低收入四分位数的患者的 5 年 OS 降低(调整后的危险比 [AHR],1.18-1.22;P <.05),年龄较大(AHR,1.82;P <.001)或拥有医疗补助或无保险(AHR,1.24;P =.032),但这些差异在调整局部治疗后不再存在或程度较小。

结论

在接受 N 阳性前列腺癌局部治疗方面存在显著的治疗差异。鉴于支持这种实践的累积证据,应研究和解决这些差异背后的因素。

相似文献

1
Disparities in the Receipt of Local Treatment of Node-positive Prostate Cancer.局部治疗淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的差异。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017 Oct;15(5):563-569.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.10.011. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
2
Income inequality and treatment of African American men with high-risk prostate cancer.收入不平等与非裔美国男性高危前列腺癌的治疗
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jan;33(1):18.e7-18.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Oct 11.
3
Association of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Factors With Receipt of Nondefinitive Therapy Among Younger Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer.社会人口学和健康相关因素与高风险前列腺癌年轻男性接受非确定性治疗的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201255. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1255.
4
Prostate cancer outcomes for men aged younger than 65 years with Medicaid versus private insurance.65 岁以下有医疗补助和私人保险的男性前列腺癌治疗结果对比。
Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):752-759. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31106. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in pathologically lymph node-positive prostate cancer.辅助放疗在病理性淋巴结阳性前列腺癌中的作用。
Cancer. 2017 Feb 1;123(3):512-520. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30373. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
6
Radical Prostatectomy or External Beam Radiation Therapy vs No Local Therapy for Survival Benefit in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A SEER-Medicare Analysis.根治性前列腺切除术或外照射放疗与不进行局部治疗对转移性前列腺癌生存获益的影响:一项监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)医保分析
J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):378-85. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.084. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
7
The impact of definitive local therapy for lymph node-positive prostate cancer: a population-based study.局部治疗对淋巴结阳性前列腺癌的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Apr 1;88(5):1064-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.01.008.
8
Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004-2009.2004 - 2009年I期乳腺癌保乳术后放疗接受情况的年龄和种族差异趋势
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Dec;39(6):568-574. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000094.
9
Survival Outcomes in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy After Primary Radiation Treatment for Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate.前列腺腺癌初次放疗后接受根治性前列腺切除术男性的生存结果
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016 Jun;14(3):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2015.12.010. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
Impact of travel distance to the treatment facility on overall mortality in US patients with prostate cancer.美国前列腺癌患者就诊距离对总死亡率的影响。
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3241-3252. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30744. Epub 2017 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in the Utilization of Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the United States: A Comprehensive Review.美国前列腺癌放射治疗使用情况的差异:一项综合综述
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar 18;7(4):100943. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100943. eCollection 2022 Jul-Aug.
2
Treatment Interruptions During Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer.前列腺癌立体定向体部放射治疗期间的治疗中断
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 19;11:796496. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.796496. eCollection 2021.
3
Disparities in Refusal of Locoregional Treatment for Prostate Adenocarcinoma.
前列腺腺癌局部区域治疗拒绝的差异。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Oct;17(10):e1489-e1501. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00839. Epub 2021 Feb 25.