Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center at Yale, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.
Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):752-759. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31106. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
In the current national debate regarding private insurance versus Medicaid expansion, understanding how insurance is associated with racial disparities in prostate cancer (CaP) outcomes has broad policy implications. In the current study, the authors examined the association between insurance status, race, and CaP outcomes.
The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program identified 155,524 men aged < 65 years who were diagnosed with CaP from 2007 through 2014. The association between insurance and stage of disease at the time of presentation was examined. Among men with localized CaP, the associations between insurance and receipt of therapy and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) were determined.
Compared with private insurance, men with Medicaid were more likely to present with metastatic disease (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.27; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.01-4.55), were less likely to receive definitive treatment (AOR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71), and had increased PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.50-2.24), regardless of race. Significant interactions between race and insurance status indicated that insurance had more than an additive association with race. Among privately insured patients, disparities in PCSM (AOR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.03-1.40 [P = .019]) and presentation with metastatic disease (AOR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21 [P<.001]) were observed. No disparities were observed among patients with Medicaid insurance with regard to PCSM (AOR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.52-1.20 [P = .272]) and metastatic disease (AOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.03 [P = .139]).
Racial disparities in the outcomes of patients with CaP were observed in privately insured cohorts, whereas these disparities appeared to be reduced among patients with Medicaid insurance. However, outcomes need to be improved overall. Whether the equality in outcomes for Medicaid is due to white and African American patients doing "equally poorly" or "equally well" is unclear. Cancer 2018;124:752-9. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
在当前关于私人保险与医疗补助扩大范围的全国性辩论中,了解保险如何与前列腺癌(CaP)结果中的种族差异相关具有广泛的政策意义。在本研究中,作者研究了保险状况、种族与 CaP 结果之间的关系。
监测、流行病学和最终结果计划确定了 2007 年至 2014 年间 155524 名年龄<65 岁的 CaP 男性患者。检查了保险与疾病分期的相关性在患有局限性 CaP 的男性中,确定了保险与治疗和前列腺癌特异性死亡率(PCSM)之间的关系。
与私人保险相比,医疗补助的男性更有可能出现转移性疾病(调整优势比[OR],4.27;95%置信区间[95%CI],4.01-4.55),不太可能接受确定性治疗(OR,0.67;95%CI,0.62-0.71),PCSM 增加(调整后的危险比,1.83;95%CI,1.50-2.24),无论种族如何。种族和保险状况之间存在显著的相互作用,表明保险与种族的关系不仅仅是累加的。在私人保险患者中,PCSM(OR,1.2;95%CI,1.03-1.40[P=0.019])和转移性疾病(OR,1.13;95%CI,1.06-1.21[P<.001])的差异观察到。医疗补助保险患者的 PCSM(OR,0.79;95%CI,0.52-1.20[P=0.272])和转移性疾病(OR,0.91;95%CI,0.80-1.03[P=0.139])无差异。
在私人保险队列中观察到 CaP 患者结局的种族差异,而在医疗补助保险患者中,这些差异似乎减少。然而,总体上需要改善结果。 Medicaid 结果的平等是否是由于白人和非裔美国人患者“同样差”或“同样好”尚不清楚。癌症 2018;124:752-9。© 2017 美国癌症协会。