• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期和晚期复发性鼻出血入院情况:发病率模式及危险因素

Early and Late Recurrent Epistaxis Admissions: Patterns of Incidence and Risk Factors.

作者信息

Cohen Oded, Shoffel-Havakuk Hagit, Warman Meir, Tzelnick Sharon, Haimovich Yaara, Kohlberg Gavriel D, Halperin Doron, Lahav Yonatan

机构信息

1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.

2 Hadassah Medical School, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep;157(3):424-431. doi: 10.1177/0194599817705619. Epub 2017 May 2.

DOI:10.1177/0194599817705619
PMID:28463569
Abstract

Objective Epistaxis is a common complaint, yet few studies have focused on the incidence and risk factors of recurrent epistaxis. Our objective was to determine the patterns of incidence and risk factors for recurrent epistaxis admission (REA). Study Design Case series with chart review. Settings Single academic center. Subjects and Methods The medical records of patients admitted for epistaxis between 1999 and 2015 were reviewed. The follow-up period was defined as 3 years following initial admission. REAs were categorized as early (30 days) and late (31 days to 3 years) following initial admission. Logistic regression was used to identify potential predictors of REAs. Results A total of 653 patients were included. Eighty-six patients (14%) had REAs: 48 (7.5%) early and 38 (6.5%) late. Nonlinear incidence curve was demonstrated for both early and late REAs. Based on logistic regression, prior nasal surgery and anemia were independent risk factors for early REAs. According to multivariate analysis, thrombocytopenia was significantly associated with late REAs. Conclusion Early and late REAs demonstrate different risk predictors. Knowledge of such risk factors may help in risk stratification for this selected group of patients. All patients at risk should be advised on possible preventive measures. Patients at risk for early REA may benefit from a more proactive approach.

摘要

目的 鼻出血是一种常见症状,但很少有研究关注复发性鼻出血的发生率及危险因素。我们的目的是确定复发性鼻出血入院(REA)的发生率模式及危险因素。研究设计 病例系列研究并进行图表回顾。研究地点 单一学术中心。研究对象与方法 回顾了1999年至2015年间因鼻出血入院患者的病历。随访期定义为初次入院后3年。REA被分为初次入院后早期(30天内)和晚期(31天至3年)。采用逻辑回归分析确定REA的潜在预测因素。结果 共纳入653例患者。86例患者(14%)发生REA:48例(7.5%)为早期,38例(6.5%)为晚期。早期和晚期REA均呈现非线性发生率曲线。基于逻辑回归分析,既往鼻部手术和贫血是早期REA的独立危险因素。多因素分析显示,血小板减少与晚期REA显著相关。结论 早期和晚期REA具有不同的风险预测因素。了解这些危险因素有助于对这一特定患者群体进行风险分层。应向所有有风险的患者告知可能的预防措施。有早期REA风险的患者可能从更积极的治疗方法中获益。

相似文献

1
Early and Late Recurrent Epistaxis Admissions: Patterns of Incidence and Risk Factors.早期和晚期复发性鼻出血入院情况:发病率模式及危险因素
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Sep;157(3):424-431. doi: 10.1177/0194599817705619. Epub 2017 May 2.
2
The epidemiology and chronobiology of epistaxis: an investigation of Scottish hospital admissions 1995-2004.鼻出血的流行病学与时间生物学:对1995 - 2004年苏格兰医院入院病例的调查
Clin Otolaryngol. 2007 Oct;32(5):361-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2007.01530.x.
3
Conservative management of epistaxis: are we putting patients at risk of developing venous thromboembolic complications?鼻出血的保守治疗:我们是否在将患者置于发生静脉血栓栓塞并发症的风险中?
Rhinology. 2005 Jun;43(2):135-7.
4
Patterns of hospital attendance with epistaxis.鼻出血的医院就诊模式。
Rhinology. 1997 Sep;35(3):129-31.
5
Risk factors for recurrent spontaneous epistaxis.复发性自发性鼻出血的危险因素。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Dec;89(12):1636-43. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Predictors of bleeding disorders in children with epistaxis: value of preoperative tests and clinical screening.鼻出血患儿出血性疾病的预测因素:术前检查和临床筛查的价值
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012 Jun;76(6):767-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.02.033. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
7
Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.越南胡志明市短期暴露于空气污染对幼儿急性下呼吸道感染住院率的影响。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2012 Jun(169):5-72; discussion 73-83.
8
[Epidemiological notes on nasal bleeding].
An Otorrinolaringol Ibero Am. 2004;31(2):123-32.
9
Epistaxis in healthy children requiring hospital admission.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Sep;68(9):1181-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.04.015.
10
Recurrent epistaxis: predicting risk of 30-day readmission, derivation and validation of RHINO-ooze score.
Rhinology. 2017 Jun 1;55(2):99-105. doi: 10.4193/Rhin16.259.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive factors for severe epistaxis in a tertiary center of Tunisia.突尼斯某三级医疗中心严重鼻出血的预测因素
Tunis Med. 2024 Dec 5;102(12):1048-1054. doi: 10.62438/tunismed.v102i12.5210.
2
Outpatient management of pediatric epistaxis: A cost analysis and clinical model.小儿鼻出血的门诊管理:成本分析与临床模型
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2024 Oct 8;9(5):e1310. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1310. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Management of uncontrolled/recurrent epistaxis by ligation or cauterization of the sphenopalatine artery: a scoping review.
经蝶腭动脉结扎或烧灼术治疗未控制/复发性鼻出血的管理:范围综述。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Dec;281(12):6229-6238. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08852-1. Epub 2024 Jul 28.
4
The pattern of epistaxis recurrence in patients taking prophylactic acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) from a 10 year cohort.服用预防剂量乙酰水杨酸(ASA)的患者 10 年队列中鼻出血复发的模式。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Apr;280(4):1723-1730. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07666-3. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
5
Risk Factors and Management for Epistaxis in a Hospitalized Adult Sample.住院成年患者鼻出血的危险因素及管理
Spartan Med Res J. 2022 Sep 6;7(2):37760. doi: 10.51894/001c.37760. eCollection 2022.
6
Clinical Implications of Thrombocytopenia for the Cirrhotic Patient.血小板减少症对肝硬化患者的临床意义
Hepat Med. 2020 Apr 14;12:49-60. doi: 10.2147/HMER.S244596. eCollection 2020.
7
Hospitalization for epistaxis: a population-based healthcare research study in Thuringia, Germany.因鼻出血住院:德国图林根州的一项基于人群的医疗保健研究
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Jun;277(6):1659-1666. doi: 10.1007/s00405-020-05875-2. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
8
Shorter hospital stays in epistaxis patients with atrial fibrillation when taking rivaroxaban or apixaban versus phenprocoumon.与使用苯丙香豆素相比,房颤患者使用利伐沙班或阿哌沙班时,其鼻出血患者的住院时间更短。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2019 Apr;47(3):384-391. doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01824-x.