Sathler D F T, Prados L F, Zanetti D, Silva B C, Filho S C Valadares, Pacheco M V C, Amaral P M, Rennó L N, Paulino M F
J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;95(4):1715-1726. doi: 10.2527/jas.2016.1084.
This study evaluated intake, microbial efficiency, and ruminal, small and large intestinal, and total digestibility of DM, OM, CP, and NDF, as well as availability of Ca, P, Mg, Na, K, Cu, Mn, and Zn in Zebu cattle fed with or without supplemental sources of Ca and P or a micromineral premix. Five rumen- and ileum-cannulated Nellore bulls (BW = 200 ± 10.5 kg; 9 mo) were used in the experiment, distributed in a 5 × 5 Latin square design. The experiment was developed in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial design to measure the effects of mineral supplementation on intake, digestibility, and site of nutrient absorption. The factors consisted of 2 Ca and P levels (macromineral factor; CaP+ or CaP-) and 2 microminerals levels (micromineral factor; CuMnZn+ or CuMnZn-). In addition, a treatment with alimentary restriction (REST) was evaluated at 1.7% of BW. Nutrient fluxes were measured in the omasum and ileum, in addition to intake and fecal excretion. Microbial efficiency was estimated using purine derivative excretion. Dry matter, OM, NDF, CP intake, and total digestibility were not affected ( ≥ 0.058) by the absence of Ca, P, Cu, Mn, and Zn supplementation. Intake of Ca, P, and Mg were reduced ( < 0.01) by CaP-. The absence of CuMnZn reduced ( < 0.01) Cu, Mn, and Zn intake. Ruminal recycling of P, Na, and K is significant for increasing the influx of these minerals to the digestive tract; however, influences of treatments were not observed. The small and large intestines contributed to mineral absorption in different proportions ( < 0.05), according to minerals and treatments. Because of the similarity ( > 0.05) of OM, NDF, and CP digestion sites and coefficients, we assume that omitting supplemental sources of Ca, P, Cu, Mn, and Zn may be an option in raising cattle on feedlots. If supplementation is viable, knowledge about the specific absorption site of each mineral could positively impact choices about the supplemental source.
本研究评估了在给或不给补充钙、磷或微量矿物质预混料的情况下,瘤牛对干物质(DM)、有机物(OM)、粗蛋白(CP)和中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的摄入量、微生物效率以及瘤胃、小肠和大肠的消化率,以及钙、磷、镁、钠、钾、铜、锰和锌的利用率。实验使用了5头安装有瘤胃和回肠瘘管的内洛尔公牛(体重=200±10.5千克;9月龄),采用5×5拉丁方设计。实验采用2×2+1析因设计来测量矿物质补充对摄入量、消化率和养分吸收部位的影响。因素包括2个钙和磷水平(常量矿物质因素;CaP+或CaP-)和2个微量矿物质水平(微量矿物质因素;CuMnZn+或CuMnZn-)。此外,还评估了以体重的1.7%进行限饲(REST)的处理。除了摄入量和粪便排泄外,还测量了瘤胃和回肠中的养分通量。使用嘌呤衍生物排泄来估计微生物效率。不补充钙、磷、铜、锰和锌对干物质、有机物、中性洗涤纤维、粗蛋白摄入量和总消化率没有影响(P≥0.058)。CaP-降低了钙、磷和镁的摄入量(P<0.01)。不补充CuMnZn降低了铜、锰和锌的摄入量(P<0.01)。磷、钠和钾的瘤胃再循环对增加这些矿物质向消化道的流入具有重要意义;然而,未观察到处理的影响。根据矿物质和处理方式,小肠和大肠对矿物质吸收的贡献比例不同(P<0.05)。由于有机物、中性洗涤纤维和粗蛋白消化部位及系数相似(P>0.05),我们认为在饲养场饲养肉牛时,省略钙、磷、铜、锰和锌的补充来源可能是一种选择。如果补充是可行的,了解每种矿物质的特定吸收部位可能会对补充来源的选择产生积极影响。