Rice Ketra, Gressard Lindsay, DeGroff Amy, Gersten Joanne, Robie Janene, Leadbetter Steven, Glover-Kudon Rebecca, Butterly Lynn
Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
New Hampshire Colorectal Cancer Screening Program, Mary Hitchcock Memorial Hospital, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Cancer. 2017 Sep 1;123(17):3356-3366. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30761. Epub 2017 May 2.
To investigate uniformly successful results from a statewide program of patient navigation (PN) for colonoscopy, this comparison study evaluated the effectiveness of the PN intervention by comparing outcomes for navigated versus non-navigated patients in one of the community health clinics included in the statewide program. Outcomes measured included screening completion, adequacy of bowel preparation, missed appointments and cancellations, communication of test results, and consistency of follow-up recommendations with clinical guidelines.
The authors compared a subset of 131 patients who were navigated to a screening or surveillance colonoscopy with a similar subset of 75 non-navigated patients at one endoscopy clinic. The prevalence and prevalence odds ratios were computed to measure the association between PN and each study outcome measure.
Patients in the PN intervention group were 11.2 times more likely to complete colonoscopy than control patients (96.2% vs 69.3%; P<.001), and were 5.9 times more likely to have adequate bowel preparation (P =.010). In addition, intervention patients had no missed appointments compared with 15.6% of control patients, and were 24.8 times more likely to not have a cancellation <24 hours before their appointment (P<.001). All navigated patients and their primary care providers received test results, and all follow-up recommendations were consistent with clinical guidelines compared with 82.4% of patients in the control group (P<.001).
PN appears to be effective for improving colonoscopy screening completion and quality in the disparate populations most in need of intervention. To the best of our knowledge, the results of the current study demonstrate some of the strongest evidence for the effectiveness of PN to date, and highlight its value for public health. Cancer 2017;123:3356-66. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
为了调查全州范围内结肠镜检查患者导航(PN)计划的一致成功结果,这项比较研究通过比较全州计划中一家社区健康诊所内接受导航与未接受导航患者的结果,评估了PN干预措施的有效性。测量的结果包括筛查完成情况、肠道准备是否充分、错过预约和取消预约情况、检查结果的传达以及随访建议与临床指南的一致性。
作者在一家内镜诊所,将131名接受导航进行筛查或监测结肠镜检查的患者子集与75名未接受导航的类似患者子集进行了比较。计算患病率和患病率比值比,以衡量PN与每项研究结果指标之间的关联。
PN干预组患者完成结肠镜检查的可能性是对照组患者的11.2倍(96.2%对69.3%;P<0.001),肠道准备充分的可能性是对照组患者的5.9倍(P = 0.010)。此外,干预组患者没有错过预约,而对照组患者中有15.6%错过预约,干预组患者在预约前<24小时取消预约的可能性比对照组患者低24.8倍(P<0.001)。所有接受导航的患者及其初级保健提供者都收到了检查结果,所有随访建议均与临床指南一致,而对照组中这一比例为82.4%(P<0.001)。
PN似乎对于改善最需要干预的不同人群的结肠镜检查筛查完成率和质量是有效的。据我们所知,当前研究结果证明了PN有效性的一些迄今为止最有力的证据,并突出了其对公共卫生的价值。《癌症》2017年;123:3356 - 66。©2017美国癌症协会。