• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对医疗补助患者导航员干预措施以增加结直肠癌筛查的使用情况和效果的研究,北卡罗来纳州海角恐惧地区,2011 年。

Reach, usage, and effectiveness of a Medicaid patient navigator intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening, Cape Fear, North Carolina, 2011.

机构信息

Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, 725 Martin Luther King Jr Blvd, CB# 7590, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 May 23;10:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120221.

DOI:10.5888/pcd10.120221
PMID:23701719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3670641/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Screening for colorectal cancer can reduce incidence and death, but screening is underused, especially among vulnerable groups such as Medicaid patients. Effective interventions are needed to increase screening frequency. Our study consisted of a controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve colorectal cancer screening among Medicaid patients in North Carolina.

METHODS

The intervention included a mailed screening reminder letter and decision aid followed by telephone support from an offsite, Medicaid-based, patient navigator. The study included 12 clinical practices, 6 as intervention practices and 6 as matched controls. Eligible patients were aged 50 years or older, covered by Medicaid, and identified from Medicaid claims data as not current with colorectal cancer screening recommendations. We reviewed Medicaid claims data at 6 months and conducted multivariate logistic regression to compare participant screening in intervention practices with participants in control practices. We controlled for sociodemographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Most of the sample was black (53.1%) and female (57.2%); the average age was 56.5 years. On the basis of Medicaid claims, 9.2% of intervention participants (n = 22/240) had had a colorectal cancer screening at the 6-month review, compared with 7.5% of control patients (n = 13/174). The adjusted odds ratio when controlling for age, comorbidities, race, sex, and continuous Medicaid eligibility was 1.44 (95% confidence interval, 0.68-3.06). The patient navigator reached 44 participants (27.6%).

CONCLUSION

The intervention had limited reach and little effect after 6 months on the number of participants screened. Higher-intensity interventions, such as use of practice-based navigators, may be needed to reach and improve screening rates in vulnerable populations.

摘要

简介

结直肠癌筛查可以降低发病率和死亡率,但筛查的应用不足,尤其是在医疗补助患者等弱势群体中。需要有效的干预措施来提高筛查频率。我们的研究包括一项针对北卡罗来纳州医疗补助患者结直肠癌筛查的干预措施的对照试验。

方法

该干预措施包括邮寄筛查提醒信和决策辅助,然后由场外的、基于医疗补助的患者导航员提供电话支持。该研究包括 12 家临床实践,其中 6 家为干预实践,6 家为匹配对照。符合条件的患者年龄在 50 岁或以上,由医疗补助覆盖,并从医疗补助索赔数据中确定为不符合结直肠癌筛查建议。我们在 6 个月时审查了医疗补助索赔数据,并进行了多变量逻辑回归,以比较干预实践中的参与者筛查与对照实践中的参与者。我们控制了社会人口统计学特征。

结果

样本中大多数是黑人(53.1%)和女性(57.2%);平均年龄为 56.5 岁。根据医疗补助索赔数据,干预组的 9.2%(n=22/240)在 6 个月的审查中接受了结直肠癌筛查,而对照组的 7.5%(n=13/174)。在控制年龄、合并症、种族、性别和连续医疗补助资格后,调整后的优势比为 1.44(95%置信区间,0.68-3.06)。患者导航员联系了 44 名参与者(27.6%)。

结论

该干预措施在 6 个月后对接受筛查的参与者数量的影响有限,效果不佳。可能需要更强化的干预措施,如利用实践为基础的导航员,才能接触并提高弱势群体的筛查率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3d/3670641/abe3999909ea/PCD-10-E82s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3d/3670641/abe3999909ea/PCD-10-E82s01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3d/3670641/abe3999909ea/PCD-10-E82s01.jpg

相似文献

1
Reach, usage, and effectiveness of a Medicaid patient navigator intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening, Cape Fear, North Carolina, 2011.一项针对医疗补助患者导航员干预措施以增加结直肠癌筛查的使用情况和效果的研究,北卡罗来纳州海角恐惧地区,2011 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 May 23;10:E82. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120221.
2
Comparing the effect of a decision aid plus patient navigation with usual care on colorectal cancer screening completion in vulnerable populations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.比较决策辅助工具加患者导航与常规护理对弱势群体结直肠癌筛查完成情况的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Jul 8;15:275. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-275.
3
Effect of Combined Patient Decision Aid and Patient Navigation vs Usual Care for Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Vulnerable Patient Population: A Randomized Clinical Trial.联合患者决策辅助工具与患者导航服务对比常规护理对弱势患者群体进行结直肠癌筛查的效果:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):967-974. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1294.
4
Mailed FIT (fecal immunochemical test), navigation or patient reminders? Using microsimulation to inform selection of interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening in Medicaid enrollees.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)、导航或患者提醒?利用微模拟为选择干预措施提供信息,以增加医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105836. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105836. Epub 2019 Oct 18.
5
Telephone outreach to increase colon cancer screening in medicaid managed care organizations: a randomized controlled trial.电话外拨以增加医疗补助管理式医疗组织中的结肠癌筛查:一项随机对照试验。
Ann Fam Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;11(4):335-43. doi: 10.1370/afm.1469.
6
Exploring implications of Medicaid participation and wait times for colorectal screening on early detection efforts in Connecticut--a secret-shopper survey.探索医疗补助计划参与情况及结直肠癌筛查等待时间对康涅狄格州早期检测工作的影响——一项暗访调查
Conn Med. 2013 Apr;77(4):197-203.
7
Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: What would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina?通过模拟评估多组分干预措施对结直肠癌筛查的影响:北卡罗来纳州需要采取什么措施才能达到国家筛查目标?
Prev Med. 2022 Sep;162:107126. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107126. Epub 2022 Jul 3.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Four Simulated Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions, North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州四种模拟结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益分析
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Feb 23;14:E18. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160158.
9
Patient navigator reported patient barriers and delivered activities in two large federally-funded cancer screening programs.患者导航员在两个大型联邦资助的癌症筛查项目中报告了患者的障碍并开展了相关活动。
Prev Med. 2019 Dec;129S:105858. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105858. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
10
The Efficacy of Direct Mail, Patient Navigation, and Incentives for Increasing Mammography and Colonoscopy in the Medicaid Population: A Randomized Controlled Trial.直邮、患者导航和激励措施对提高医疗补助人群中乳房 X 光检查和结肠镜检查效果的随机对照试验。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018 Sep;27(9):1047-1056. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0038. Epub 2018 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review.旨在减少癌症连续过程中不平等现象的干预措施的特征:一项范围综述。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 15;157(6):1043-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35478. Epub 2025 May 26.
2
Results of an African American-targeted norm-based colorectal cancer screening intervention: a pilot study.以非裔美国人为目标的基于标准的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的结果:一项试点研究。
J Behav Med. 2023 Jun;46(3):391-404. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00367-6. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
3
Addressing the Social Needs of Medicaid Enrollees Through Managed Care: Lessons and Promising Practices from the Field.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of colorectal cancer screening among adults--Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010.2010年美国成年人结直肠癌筛查普及率——行为危险因素监测系统
MMWR Suppl. 2012 Jun 15;61(2):51-6.
2
Promoting decision aid use in primary care using a staff member for delivery.利用员工来推广初级保健中决策辅助工具的使用。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Feb;86(2):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.04.033. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
3
Effectiveness of a web-based colorectal cancer screening patient decision aid: a randomized controlled trial in a mixed-literacy population.
通过管理式医疗满足医疗补助计划参保者的社会需求:来自该领域的经验教训和有前景的实践。
Popul Health Manag. 2022 Feb;25(1):119-125. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0142. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men: A systematic review and meta-analysis.提高非裔美国男性结直肠癌筛查参与度的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 16;15(9):e0238354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238354. eCollection 2020.
5
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase Cancer Screening in Populations Adversely Affected by Health Disparities: a Meta-analysis.患者导航对增加受健康差异负面影响人群癌症筛查的效果:一项荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Oct;35(10):3026-3035. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06020-9. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Comparative cost-effectiveness of mailed fecal immunochemical testing (FIT)-based interventions for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the Medicaid population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)为基础的干预措施在医疗补助人群中提高结直肠癌筛查的成本效益比较。
Cancer. 2020 Sep 15;126(18):4197-4208. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32992. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
7
Testing a Culturally Adapted Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Aid Among American Indians: Results from a Pre-Post Trial.在美国印第安人中测试一种文化适应性的结直肠癌筛查决策辅助工具:一项前后试验的结果。
Health Equity. 2020 Apr 1;4(1):91-98. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0095. eCollection 2020.
8
Purged from the Rolls: A Study of Medicaid Disenrollment in Iowa.从名册中清除:爱荷华州医疗补助计划参保资格取消情况研究
Health Equity. 2019 Dec 16;3(1):637-643. doi: 10.1089/heq.2019.0093. eCollection 2019.
9
Editor's Choice: Deliberative and non-deliberative effects of descriptive and injunctive norms on cancer screening behaviors among African Americans.编辑精选:描述性规范和指令性规范对非裔美国人癌症筛查行为的思考性和非思考性影响。
Psychol Health. 2020 Jul;35(7):774-794. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1691725. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
10
Colorectal cancer and screening awareness and sources of information in the Hungarian population.匈牙利人群对结直肠癌及筛查的认知与信息来源
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 30;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0799-1.
基于网络的结直肠癌筛查患者决策辅助工具的有效性:在混合读写人群中进行的一项随机对照试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.019.
4
Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 50-75 years - United States, 2008.生命体征:50-75 岁成年人的结直肠癌筛查-美国,2008 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010 Jul 9;59(26):808-12.
5
Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention.健康的结肠,健康的生活:一种新型结直肠癌筛查干预措施。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Jul;39(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.02.020.
6
Evaluating the implementation of peer counseling in a church-based dietary intervention for African Americans.评估基于教会的针对非裔美国人的饮食干预中的同伴咨询实施情况。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Oct;81(1):37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.018. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
7
A multilevel intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among community health center patients: results of a pilot study.一项促进社区卫生中心患者进行结直肠癌筛查的多层次干预措施:一项试点研究的结果。
BMC Fam Pract. 2009 May 29;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-10-37.
8
Patient and physician reminders to promote colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.促进结直肠癌筛查的患者及医生提醒:一项随机对照试验
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Feb 23;169(4):364-71. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.564.
9
A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.社区卫生中心针对结直肠癌筛查的文化定制导航计划:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):211-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0864-x.
10
Recommendation for and receipt of cancer screenings among medicaid recipients 50 years and older.50岁及以上医疗补助受助者的癌症筛查建议及接受情况
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Oct 13;168(18):2014-21. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.18.2014.