• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字时代的浪漫关系质量:一项针对年轻人的研究。

Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults.

作者信息

Sánchez Virginia, Muñoz-Fernández Noelia, Ortega-Ruiz Rosario

机构信息

Universidad de Sevilla (Spain).

Universidad de Córdoba (Spain).

出版信息

Span J Psychol. 2017 May 3;20:E24. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.20.

DOI:10.1017/sjp.2017.20
PMID:28464978
Abstract

Recent studies suggest that the online and offline behaviors young people display in romantic relationships are closely related. However, the differential effects of the dimensions of couple quality in the online context have not yet been explored in depth. The aim of this study was to explore online couple quality in young-adult relationships, and its association with romantic relationship satisfaction, also looking at effects of gender, age, and length of the relationship. 431 university students currently in a romantic relationship (68.2% females; mean age = 21.57) participated in this study. They completed different self-report measures to tap the online quality of their romantic relationships (online intimacy, control, jealousy, intrusiveness, cyberdating practices, and communication strategies) and level of satisfaction with those relationships. Results showed that participants more often reported online intimacy (M men = 2.49; M women = 2.38) than the negative scales of online quality (mean ranged from .43 to 1.50), and all the online quality scales decreased with age (correlations ranged from -.12 to -.30) and relationship length (correlations ranged from -.02 to -.20). Linear regression analyses indicated that online intimacy (b = .32, p = .001) and intrusiveness (b = .11, p = .035) were positively related to relationship satisfaction, while cyberdating practices (b = -.20, p = .001) and communication strategies (b = -.34, p = .001) were negatively correlated with relationship satisfaction. Moreover, gender and relationship length moderated some of these associations. Results indicate that while online quality and relationship satisfaction are related, the impact of different online quality dimensions on relationship satisfaction differs depending on a participant's sex, age, and relationship length.

摘要

最近的研究表明,年轻人在恋爱关系中表现出的线上和线下行为密切相关。然而,情侣关系质量维度在网络环境中的差异影响尚未得到深入探讨。本研究的目的是探讨青年恋爱关系中的线上情侣关系质量,及其与恋爱关系满意度的关联,同时考察性别、年龄和恋爱时长的影响。431名正在恋爱的大学生(68.2%为女性;平均年龄=21.57岁)参与了本研究。他们完成了不同的自我报告测量,以评估其恋爱关系的线上质量(线上亲密度、掌控感、嫉妒心、侵扰性、网络约会行为和沟通策略)以及对这些关系的满意度水平。结果显示,与线上质量的负面量表(均值范围为0.43至1.50)相比,参与者更多地报告了线上亲密度(男性均值=2.49;女性均值=2.38),并且所有线上质量量表都随着年龄(相关性范围为-0.12至-0.30)和恋爱时长(相关性范围为-0.02至-0.20)而下降。线性回归分析表明,线上亲密度(b = 0.32,p = 0.001)和侵扰性(b = 0.11,p = 0.035)与恋爱关系满意度呈正相关,而网络约会行为(b = -0.20,p = 0.001)和沟通策略(b = -0.34,p = 0.001)与恋爱关系满意度呈负相关。此外,性别和恋爱时长调节了其中一些关联。结果表明,虽然线上质量与恋爱关系满意度相关,但不同线上质量维度对恋爱关系满意度的影响因参与者的性别、年龄和恋爱时长而异。

相似文献

1
Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults.数字时代的浪漫关系质量:一项针对年轻人的研究。
Span J Psychol. 2017 May 3;20:E24. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2017.20.
2
Assessing Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction in Adolescent Relationships Formed Online and Offline.评估青少年线上和线下恋爱关系中的关系及性满意度。
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Jan;58(1):11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.027.
3
Facebook and romantic relationships: intimacy and couple satisfaction associated with online social network use.脸书与恋爱关系:网络社交使用与亲密关系和伴侣满意度相关。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Jan;16(1):8-13. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0038. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
4
Effects of self- and partner's online disclosure on relationship intimacy and satisfaction.自我和伴侣的在线披露对关系亲密和满意度的影响。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0212186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212186. eCollection 2019.
5
Time to face it! Facebook intrusion and the implications for romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction.直面现实!Facebook 入侵对浪漫嫉妒和关系满意度的影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2011 Nov;14(11):631-5. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0318. Epub 2011 May 6.
6
The green eyed monster in the bottle: Relationship contingent self-esteem, romantic jealousy, and alcohol-related problems.瓶子里的嫉妒心魔:关系依赖型自尊、浪漫嫉妒与酒精相关问题。
Addict Behav. 2015 Oct;49:52-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
Relationships between body image, sexual satisfaction, and relationship quality in romantic couples.浪漫伴侣中的体像、性满足与关系质量之间的关系。
J Fam Psychol. 2018 Jun;32(4):466-474. doi: 10.1037/fam0000407. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
8
Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction.夫妻沟通、情感和性亲密以及关系满意度。
J Sex Marital Ther. 2014;40(4):275-93. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2012.751072. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
9
Online communication predicts Belgian adolescents' initiation of romantic and sexual activity.网络交流可预测比利时青少年开始浪漫和性活动的情况。
Eur J Pediatr. 2016 Apr;175(4):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s00431-015-2666-6. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
10
Post sex affectionate exchanges promote sexual and relationship satisfaction.性行为后的深情交流能提升性满意度和关系满意度。
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Oct;43(7):1391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0305-3. Epub 2014 Apr 29.