Lee Joseph, Pelkey Ryan, Gubitosa Julieanna, Henrick Michael F, Ganz Michael L
Statistician, Evidera, San Francisco, CA.
Research Associate, Evidera, San Francisco.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2017 Feb;10(1):42-49.
Methotrexate (MTX) is the primary disease-modifying antirheumatic drug used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Optimizing the use of oral and subcutaneous MTX may delay the use of expensive biologic therapies; the effect of such a delay on overall medical costs is currently unknown.
To compare the 5-year healthcare costs of treatment pathways for patients with RA who initiate oral MTX in the United States.
We identified patients with RA in the Symphony Health Solutions database (Integrated Dataverse) who initiated treatment with oral MTX in 2009 and had RA-related claims for each year through 2014. We then grouped the patients into 4 treatment cohorts, including those who (1) continued to use oral MTX, (2) switched to subcutaneous MTX, (3) switched to subcutaneous MTX and then added or switched to a biologic therapy, and (4) added or switched to a biologic therapy. The costs (in 2015 US dollars) for pharmaceuticals, office visits, hospitalizations, and emergency department visits were estimated for each cohort.
Of the total 35,640 patients in this study, 15,599 patients continued to use oral MTX, with an average cost of $47,464 per patient in the full study period; 1802 patients switched to subcutaneous MTX, with an average per-patient cost of $59,058; 711 patients switched to subcutaneous MTX and then added or switched to a biologic agent, with an average per-patient cost of $175,391 and a mean time to a biologic use of 1184 days; and 17,528 patients added or switched to a biologic from oral MTX, with an average per-patient cost of $212,595 and a mean time to a biologic use of 478 days. Biologic treatments were responsible for the cost differences between the cohorts; the nondrug costs were similar across the groups.
Our findings that patients who switched to subcutaneous MTX incurred lower costs than patients who only used oral MTX before using biologics may provide useful information for patients and providers who are choosing between continued MTX use and adding or switching to a biologic based on treatment guidelines.
甲氨蝶呤(MTX)是用于治疗类风湿关节炎(RA)的主要改善病情抗风湿药。优化口服和皮下注射MTX的使用可能会延迟昂贵生物疗法的使用;目前尚不清楚这种延迟对总体医疗费用的影响。
比较美国开始使用口服MTX的RA患者治疗方案的5年医疗保健成本。
我们在Symphony Health Solutions数据库(综合数据集)中识别出2009年开始使用口服MTX且在2014年之前每年都有RA相关索赔的RA患者。然后,我们将患者分为4个治疗队列,包括那些(1)继续使用口服MTX的患者,(2)改用皮下注射MTX的患者,(3)改用皮下注射MTX然后添加或改用生物疗法的患者,以及(4)添加或改用生物疗法的患者。估算了每个队列的药品、门诊、住院和急诊就诊费用(以2015年美元计)。
本研究中共有35640名患者,其中15599名患者继续使用口服MTX,在整个研究期间每位患者的平均费用为47464美元;1802名患者改用皮下注射MTX,每位患者的平均费用为59058美元;711名患者改用皮下注射MTX然后添加或改用生物制剂,每位患者的平均费用为175391美元,开始使用生物制剂的平均时间为1184天;17528名患者从口服MTX添加或改用生物制剂,每位患者的平均费用为212595美元,开始使用生物制剂的平均时间为478天。生物治疗导致了队列之间的成本差异;各组的非药物成本相似。
我们的研究结果表明,在使用生物制剂之前,改用皮下注射MTX的患者比仅使用口服MTX的患者成本更低,这可能为根据治疗指南在继续使用MTX和添加或改用生物制剂之间做出选择的患者和医疗服务提供者提供有用信息。