Sagreiya Hersh, Chen Yi-Ren, Kumarasamy Narmadan A, Ponnusamy Karthik, Chen Doris, Das Amar K
Radiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University Medical Center.
Cureus. 2017 Feb 26;9(2):e1059. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1059.
In recent years, antipsychotic medications have increasingly been used in pediatric and geriatric populations, despite the fact that many of these drugs were approved based on clinical trials in adult patients only. Preliminary studies have shown that the "off-label" use of these drugs in pediatric and geriatric populations may result in adverse events not found in adults. In this study, we utilized the large-scale U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (AERS) database to look at differences in adverse events from antipsychotics among adult, pediatric, and geriatric populations. We performed a systematic analysis of the FDA AERS database using MySQL by standardizing the database using structured terminologies and ontologies. We compared adverse event profiles of atypical versus typical antipsychotic medications among adult (18-65), pediatric (age < 18), and geriatric (> 65) populations. We found statistically significant differences between the number of adverse events in the pediatric versus adult populations with aripiprazole, clozapine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and thiothixene, and between the geriatric versus adult populations with aripiprazole, chlorpromazine, clozapine, fluphenazine, haloperidol, paliperidone, promazine, risperidone, thiothixene, and ziprasidone (p < 0.05, with adjustment for multiple comparisons). Furthermore, the particular types of adverse events reported also varied significantly between each population for aripiprazole, clozapine, haloperidol, olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone, and ziprasidone (Chi-square, p < 10). Diabetes was the most commonly reported side effect in the adult population, compared to behavioral problems in the pediatric population and neurologic symptoms in the geriatric population. We also found discrepancies between the frequencies of reports in AERS and in the literature. Our analysis of the FDA AERS database shows that there are significant differences in both the numbers and types of adverse events among these age groups and between atypical and typical antipsychotics. It is important for clinicians to be mindful of these differences when prescribing antipsychotics, especially when prescribing medications off-label.
近年来,抗精神病药物越来越多地用于儿科和老年人群,尽管其中许多药物仅基于成年患者的临床试验获得批准。初步研究表明,这些药物在儿科和老年人群中的“非标签”使用可能会导致成年人未出现的不良事件。在本研究中,我们利用美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(AERS)的大型数据库,来研究成人、儿科和老年人群中抗精神病药物不良事件的差异。我们使用MySQL对FDA AERS数据库进行了系统分析,通过使用结构化术语和本体对数据库进行标准化。我们比较了成人(18 - 65岁)、儿科(年龄<18岁)和老年(>65岁)人群中非典型与典型抗精神病药物的不良事件概况。我们发现,使用阿立哌唑、氯氮平、氟奋乃静、氟哌啶醇、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮和硫利达嗪时,儿科与成人人群的不良事件数量存在统计学显著差异,使用阿立哌唑、氯丙嗪、氯氮平、氟奋乃静、氟哌啶醇、帕利哌酮、丙嗪、利培酮、硫利达嗪和齐拉西酮时,老年与成人人群的不良事件数量存在统计学显著差异(p < 0.05,经多重比较调整)。此外,对于阿立哌唑、氯氮平、氟哌啶醇、奥氮平、喹硫平、利培酮和齐拉西酮,各人群报告的特定不良事件类型也存在显著差异(卡方检验,p < 10)。与儿科人群中的行为问题和老年人群中的神经症状相比,糖尿病是成人人群中最常报告的副作用。我们还发现AERS中的报告频率与文献中的频率存在差异。我们对FDA AERS数据库的分析表明,这些年龄组之间以及非典型和典型抗精神病药物之间,不良事件的数量和类型均存在显著差异。临床医生在开具抗精神病药物时,尤其是开具非标签药物时,注意这些差异非常重要。