Zivanovic Vladimir, Gojkovic-Bukarica Ljiljana, Scepanovic Radisav, Vitorovic Teodora, Novakovic Radmila, Milanov Nenad, Bukumiric Zoran, Carevic Biljana, Trajkovic Jasmina, Rajkovic Jovana, Djokic Vladimir
University Hospital Center "Dr. Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje", Belgrade, Serbia.
Institute of Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
PLoS One. 2017 May 3;12(5):e0175689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175689. eCollection 2017.
In order to provide guidance data for clinically rational use of an antibiotics consuption, prescribing and prevalence of multidrug resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii were monitored on the surgical (S) and medical (M) wards of the University Hospital Center "Dr. Dragisa Misovic-Dedinje" (Belgrade, Serbia), in the study period from 2012 to 2015. Appropriateness of antimicrobial use was evaluated using the Global-Prevalence Survey method designed by the University of Antwerp. The percentages of MDR pathogens relative to the total number of isolates of K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa were higher on the S (86.2% and 49.1%) than on the M (63.2% and 36.9%) wards. The percentage of MDR A. baumannii was not different between S (93.7%) and M (79.5%) wards. An overall antibiotics consumption (defined daily doses/100 bed-days) during study was 369.7 and 261.5 on the S and M wards, respectively. A total of 225 prescriptions of antimicrobials were evaluated in138 adults admitted to wards on the day of the survey. The percentage of antimicrobials prescribed for prophylaxis on the M and S wards were 0% and 25%, respectively. Therapies were more frequently empiric (S, 86.8% and M, 80%). The percentages of medical errors on the S and M wards were 74.6% and 27.3%, respectively. The quality indicators for antibiotic prescribing on the S and M wards were as follows: the incorrect choice of antimicrobials (35.6% vs. 20.0%), inappropriate dose interval (70.6% vs. 16.9%) or duration of therapy (72.5% vs. 23.1%), a non-documented stop/review data (73.6% vs. 16.9%) and divergence from guidelines (71.9% vs. 23.1%). Treatment based on biomarkers was more common on the M wards as compared to the S wards. The increasing prevalence of MDR pathogens, a very high consumption and incorrect prescribing of antimicrobials need special attention, particularly on the S wards.
为了提供抗生素临床合理使用的指导数据,于2012年至2015年研究期间,在“德拉吉萨·米索维奇 - 德丁耶博士”大学医院中心(塞尔维亚贝尔格莱德)的外科(S)和内科(M)病房监测多重耐药(MDR)肺炎克雷伯菌、铜绿假单胞菌和鲍曼不动杆菌的处方及流行情况。采用安特卫普大学设计的全球流行率调查方法评估抗菌药物使用的合理性。肺炎克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌分离株中多重耐药病原体相对于分离株总数的百分比在外科病房(分别为86.2%和49.1%)高于内科病房(分别为63.2%和36.9%)。外科病房(93.7%)和内科病房(79.5%)的多重耐药鲍曼不动杆菌百分比无差异。研究期间外科病房和内科病房的总体抗生素消耗量(限定日剂量/100床日)分别为369.7和261.5。在调查当天对入住病房的138名成人共评估了225份抗菌药物处方。内科病房和外科病房预防性使用抗菌药物的百分比分别为0%和25%。治疗更常采用经验性用药(外科病房为86.8%,内科病房为80%)。外科病房和内科病房的医疗差错百分比分别为74.6%和27.3%。外科病房和内科病房抗生素处方的质量指标如下:抗菌药物选择不当(35.6%对20.0%)、剂量间隔不当(70.6%对16.9%)或治疗持续时间不当(72.5%对23.1%)、未记录停药/复查数据(73.6%对16.9%)以及与指南不符(71.9%对23.1%)。与外科病房相比,基于生物标志物的治疗在内科病房更为常见。多重耐药病原体的流行率不断上升、抗菌药物的高消耗量以及不正确的处方需要特别关注,尤其是在外科病房。