Uribe Pablo, Collgros Helena, Scolyer Richard A, Menzies Scott W, Guitera Pascale
Department of Dermatology, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Sep 1;153(9):882-891. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0504.
Benign melanotic macules (MAC) are the most frequent cause of lip pigmentation and sometimes difficult to differentiate from lip melanoma (MEL).
To report in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features of normal lips of different phototypes and to identify features that assist in distinguishing MEL from MAC using dermoscopy and RCM.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: For this retrospective observational study, 2 groups of patients from 2 tertiary referral centers for melanoma (Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre and Melanoma Institute Australia) were recruited between June 2007 and January 2015. Group 1 included patients with normal lips and different phototypes, and Group 2 consisted of patients with MAC and MEL; RCM and dermoscopy were used for lips analysis.
Overall, 92 RCM features were correlated with clinical history, dermoscopic images, and histopathology in all patients with MEL and 5 patients with MAC.
Images from the vermillion and/or mucosal part of the lip were recorded from 10 patients with clinically normal lips (mean [SD] age, 34.5 [6.1] years), 16 patients with MAC (mean [SD] age, 49.6 [17.9] years), and 5 patients with 6 cases of MEL (1 patient had a recurrent lesion; mean [SD] age, 56.2 [15.5] years). In normal lips, the draped pattern-a previously described MAC RCM feature-was identified in all cases. In MEL, the following findings were frequent and significantly different from MAC: epidermal disarray; pagetoid infiltration of dendritic and/or round cells; a nonspecific architectural pattern at the dermoepidermal junction (DEJ); nonhomogenously distributed papillae; continuous (lentiginous) proliferation of cells with marked atypia at the DEJ, especially in interpapillary spaces; a higher number of dendritic cells (especially roundish); and atypical round cells at the DEJ. The cellular body area of dendritic cells was about the double in MEL compared with MAC. An RCM lip algorithm was developed that provided 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity for the diagnosis of MEL of the vermillion and mucosal part of the lip. With dermoscopy, MAC were correctly classified as benign in 13 of 16 cases (81%) and MEL were classified as equivocal or malignant in 5 of 6 cases (83%).
Reflectance confocal microscopy can assist in the differential diagnosis of lip MEL and MAC. An RCM Lip Score that we developed based on study results is proposed and needs to be validated on an independent data set.
良性黑素性斑疹(MAC)是唇部色素沉着最常见的原因,有时难以与唇黑素瘤(MEL)区分。
报告不同光型正常唇部的体内反射式共聚焦显微镜(RCM)特征,并确定有助于使用皮肤镜检查和RCM区分MEL与MAC的特征。
设计、设置和参与者:在2007年6月至2015年1月期间,从2个黑色素瘤三级转诊中心(悉尼黑色素瘤诊断中心和澳大利亚黑色素瘤研究所)招募了2组患者。第1组包括具有不同光型的正常唇部患者,第2组由患有MAC和MEL的患者组成;使用RCM和皮肤镜检查对唇部进行分析。
总体而言,在所有MEL患者和5例MAC患者中,92个RCM特征与临床病史、皮肤镜图像和组织病理学相关。
记录了10例临床唇部正常患者(平均[标准差]年龄,34.5[6.1]岁)、16例MAC患者(平均[标准差]年龄,49.6[17.9]岁)和5例6例MEL患者(1例有复发病变;平均[标准差]年龄,56.2[15.5]岁)唇部朱红色和/或黏膜部分的图像。在正常唇部中,所有病例均发现了垂挂模式——一种先前描述的MAC的RCM特征。在MEL中,以下发现较为常见且与MAC有显著差异:表皮紊乱;树突状和/或圆形细胞的派杰样浸润;真皮表皮交界处(DEJ)的非特异性结构模式;乳头不均匀分布;DEJ处细胞连续(雀斑样)增殖且具有明显异型性,尤其是在乳头间隙;树突状细胞数量较多(尤其是圆形);以及DEJ处的非典型圆形细胞。MEL中树突状细胞的细胞体面积约为MAC的两倍。开发了一种RCM唇部算法,对唇部朱红色和黏膜部分的MEL诊断具有100%的敏感性和88%的特异性。在皮肤镜检查中,16例中的13例(81%)MAC被正确分类为良性,6例中的5例(83%)MEL被分类为可疑或恶性。
反射式共聚焦显微镜可辅助唇MEL和MAC的鉴别诊断。基于研究结果提出了我们开发的RCM唇部评分,需要在独立数据集上进行验证。