Department of Psychiatry,Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine,Izmir,Turkey.
Department of Psychiatry,Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health,Carlton South, Victoria 3053,Australia.
Psychol Med. 2017 Oct;47(14):2401-2413. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000952. Epub 2017 May 4.
Most studies suggested that patients with deficit schizophrenia have more severe impairment compared with patients with non-deficit schizophrenia. However, it is not clear whether deficit and non-deficit schizophrenia are associated with differential neurocognitive profiles.
The aim of this meta-analytic review was to compare cognitive performances of deficit and non-deficit patients with each other and with healthy controls. In the current meta-analysis, differences in cognitive abilities between 897 deficit and 1636 non-deficit patients with schizophrenia were examined. Cognitive performances of 899 healthy controls were also compared with 350 patients with deficit and 592 non-deficit schizophrenia.
Both deficit (d = 1.04-1.53) and non-deficit (d = 0.68-1.19) schizophrenia were associated with significant deficits in all cognitive domains. Deficit patients underperformed non-deficit patients in all cognitive domains (d = 0.24-0.84) and individual tasks (d = 0.39-0.93). The relationship between deficit syndrome and impairment in olfaction, social cognition, verbal fluency, and speed-based cognitive tasks were relatively stronger.
Our findings suggest that there is consistent evidence for a significant relationship between deficit syndrome and more severe cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.
大多数研究表明,与非缺陷型精神分裂症患者相比,缺陷型精神分裂症患者的损伤更为严重。然而,目前尚不清楚缺陷型和非缺陷型精神分裂症是否与不同的神经认知特征有关。
本荟萃分析综述的目的是比较缺陷型和非缺陷型患者之间以及与健康对照组的认知表现。在本次荟萃分析中,我们研究了 897 例缺陷型和 1636 例非缺陷型精神分裂症患者之间的认知能力差异。还将 899 名健康对照组与 350 例缺陷型和 592 例非缺陷型精神分裂症患者的认知表现进行了比较。
缺陷型(d = 1.04-1.53)和非缺陷型(d = 0.68-1.19)精神分裂症均与所有认知领域的显著缺陷相关。缺陷型患者在所有认知领域(d = 0.24-0.84)和个别任务(d = 0.39-0.93)中的表现均逊于非缺陷型患者。缺陷综合征与嗅觉、社会认知、言语流畅性和基于速度的认知任务损伤之间的关系相对较强。
我们的研究结果表明,缺陷综合征与精神分裂症患者更严重的认知损伤之间存在一致的证据。