• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

0.2%醋酸氯己定作为皮肤消毒剂可预防极早产儿皮肤损伤:初步报告

0.2% chlorhexidine acetate as skin disinfectant prevents skin lesions in extremely preterm infants: a preliminary report.

作者信息

Janssen Lisanne M A, Tostmann Alma, Hopman Joost, Liem Kian D

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Mar;103(2):F97-F100. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312694. Epub 2017 May 3.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2017-312694
PMID:28468901
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The skin disinfectant '0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% alcohol' (0.5% CHG-70% alc) may cause skin lesions in extremely preterm infants (gestational age <26 weeks). In April 2013, 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution in acetate (0.2% CHG-acetate) was introduced as skin disinfectant for extremely preterm infants in our neonatal intensive care units. We aimed to compare the incidence of skin lesions and central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) among extremely preterm infants when using 0.5% CHG-70% alc and 0.2% CHG-acetate.

DESIGN

Retrospective pre-post comparison cohort study.

PATIENTS

All electronic patient records of extremely preterm infants born between January 2011-March 2013 ('0.5% CHG-70% alc' cohort) and April 2013-October 2015 ('0.2% CHG-acetate' cohort) were reviewed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The incidence of skin lesions and CLABSI. Skin lesions were defined as the presence of erythema, blisters, excoriation, oedema or induration. CLABSI was defined according to the definition of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

RESULTS

The incidence of skin lesions was 22% (95% CI 11% to 37%) in the '0.5% CHG-70% alc' cohort (n=41) and 5% (95% CI 1% to 15%; p=0.02) in the '0.2% CHG-acetate' cohort (n=41). The incidence of CLABSI was the same in both groups (28%; 95% CI 14% to 46% in '0.5% CHG-70% alc' vs 27%; 95% CI 14% to 44% in '0.2% CHG-acetate'; p=0.98).

CONCLUSIONS

Using 0.2% CHG-acetate as skin disinfectant in extremely preterm infants resulted in statistically significant reduction of skin lesions, without increasing the risk of CLABSI as compared with 0.5% CHG-70% alc.

摘要

目的

皮肤消毒剂“70%酒精中的0.5%葡萄糖酸氯己定”(0.5%CHG - 70%酒精)可能会导致极早产儿(胎龄<26周)出现皮肤损伤。2013年4月,我们新生儿重症监护病房引入了醋酸盐中的0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定溶液(0.2%CHG - 醋酸盐)作为极早产儿的皮肤消毒剂。我们旨在比较使用0.5%CHG - 70%酒精和0.2%CHG - 醋酸盐时极早产儿皮肤损伤和中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)的发生率。

设计

回顾性前后对照队列研究。

患者

回顾了2011年1月至2013年3月出生的极早产儿(“0.5%CHG - 70%酒精”队列)和2013年4月至2015年10月出生的极早产儿(“0.2%CHG - 醋酸盐”队列)的所有电子病历。

主要观察指标

皮肤损伤和CLABSI的发生率。皮肤损伤定义为存在红斑、水疱、擦伤、水肿或硬结。CLABSI根据美国疾病控制与预防中心的定义确定。

结果

“0.5%CHG - 70%酒精”队列(n = 41)中皮肤损伤的发生率为22%(95%CI 11%至37%),“0.2%CHG - 醋酸盐”队列(n = 41)中为5%(95%CI 1%至15%;p = 0.02)。两组CLABSI的发生率相同(“0.5%CHG - 70%酒精”组为28%;95%CI 14%至46%,“0.2%CHG - 醋酸盐”组为27%;95%CI 14%至44%;p = 0.98)。

结论

在极早产儿中使用0.2%CHG - 醋酸盐作为皮肤消毒剂可使皮肤损伤发生率在统计学上显著降低,与0.5%CHG - 70%酒精相比,并未增加CLABSI的风险。

相似文献

1
0.2% chlorhexidine acetate as skin disinfectant prevents skin lesions in extremely preterm infants: a preliminary report.0.2%醋酸氯己定作为皮肤消毒剂可预防极早产儿皮肤损伤:初步报告
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Mar;103(2):F97-F100. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312694. Epub 2017 May 3.
2
Chlorhexidine bathing in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit: impact on central line-associated bloodstream infections.在三级医疗新生儿重症监护病房进行洗必泰沐浴:对中心静脉导管相关血流感染的影响
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Feb;35(2):158-63. doi: 10.1086/674862. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
3
Chlorhexidine Gluconate Utilization for Infection Prevention in the NICU: A Survey of Current Practice.葡萄糖酸氯己定在新生儿重症监护病房预防感染中的应用:当前实践调查
Adv Neonatal Care. 2020 Feb;20(1):38-47. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000658.
4
2% chlorhexidine-70% isopropyl alcohol versus 10% povidone-iodine for insertion site cleaning before central line insertion in preterm infants: a randomised trial.2%氯己定-70%异丙醇与10%聚维酮碘用于早产儿中心静脉置管前穿刺部位清洁的随机对照试验
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 Mar;103(2):F101-F106. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2016-312193. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
5
A Multicenter Pragmatic Interrupted Time Series Analysis of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing in Community Hospital Intensive Care Units.社区医院重症监护病房葡萄糖酸氯己定沐浴的多中心实用中断时间序列分析
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Jul;37(7):791-7. doi: 10.1017/ice.2016.23. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
6
Safety and efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheter insertion in preterm neonates: the ARCTIC randomised-controlled feasibility trial protocol.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定水溶液与 2%葡萄糖酸氯己定在 70%异丙醇用于早产儿经皮中心静脉置管前皮肤消毒的安全性和有效性:ARCTIC 随机对照可行性试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e028022. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028022.
7
Efficacy of chlorhexidine patches on central line-associated bloodstream infections in children.洗必泰贴膜在儿童中心静脉相关血流感染中的疗效。
Pediatr Int. 2020 Jul;62(7):789-796. doi: 10.1111/ped.14200. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
8
Daily skin cleansing with chlorhexidine did not reduce the rate of central-line associated bloodstream infection in a surgical intensive care unit.在外科重症监护病房,每天用洗必泰进行皮肤清洁并未降低中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 May;36(5):854-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1783-y. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
9
2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial.经皮中心静脉置管术前皮肤消毒用2%葡萄糖酸氯己定水溶液与70%异丙醇中的2%葡萄糖酸氯己定对比:北极随机对照可行性试验
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Feb 19;109(2):202-210. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325871.
10
[The Incidences of Catheter Colonization and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection According to Tegaderm vs. Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG)-Tegaderm Dressing].[根据透明敷料与葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHG)-透明敷料对比观察导管定植和中心静脉导管相关血流感染的发生率]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2020 Aug;50(4):541-553. doi: 10.4040/jkan.19215.

引用本文的文献

1
Chlorhexidine gluconate for antisepsis in preterm neonates: A review of safety and efficacy.葡萄糖酸氯己定在早产儿中的消毒作用:安全性和疗效评价。
Pediatr Dermatol. 2024 Sep-Oct;41(5):786-792. doi: 10.1111/pde.15709. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
2
2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheterisation: the ARCTIC randomised controlled feasibility trial.经皮中心静脉置管术前皮肤消毒用2%葡萄糖酸氯己定水溶液与70%异丙醇中的2%葡萄糖酸氯己定对比:北极随机对照可行性试验
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2024 Feb 19;109(2):202-210. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2023-325871.
3
Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Interventions for Neonates in Resource-Limited Settings.
资源有限环境下新生儿医疗相关感染的预防干预措施
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jul 7;10:919403. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.919403. eCollection 2022.
4
Aqueous chlorhexidine 1% versus 2% for neonatal skin antisepsis: a randomised non-inferiority trial.1% 与 2% 洗必泰溶液用于新生儿皮肤消毒的随机非劣效性试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021 Nov;106(6):643-648. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2020-321174. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
5
In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity of the Decontaminant HybenX Compared to Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite against Common Bacterial and Yeast Pathogens.去污剂HybenX与氯己定和次氯酸钠相比对常见细菌和酵母病原体的体外抗菌活性
Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Oct 17;8(4):188. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8040188.