Perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes of partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: Does indication matter?

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to determine whether perioperative complications and postoperative outcomes varied with the indication of partial nephrectomy (PN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed data of 184 consecutive PN for suspected renal cell carcinoma operated between January 2004 and December 2013. Complications using the Clavien-Dindo classification were compared between surgeries for absolute indications (chronic renal failure, bilateral tumors, or solitary kidney), those for relative indications (comorbid illnesses with the potential to affect renal function) and elective indications (patients without risk factors). Complex tumors were defined as size >7 cm, multiple, hilar, and endophytic tumors.

RESULTS

Patients with an absolute indication had larger tumors ( = 0.001) and tumors of a higher pathological T-stage ( = 0.03). Minor complications (Clavien 1 and 2) occurred in 25.4% patients in the elective arm versus over 40% in the other arms ( = 0.049). Major complications (Clavien 3+) were less common in the elective arm (3.2% cases vs. 12.7% in the relative arm and 13.8% in the absolute arm) with a trend to significance ( = 0.09). On multivariate analysis, absolute indication (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4, = 0.04) and surgery for a complex renal mass (OR = 2.5 times, = 0.03) remained significant predictors of minor complications. Major complications were more common in the relative (OR = 5.5, = 0.057) and absolute indication arm (OR = 5.231, = 0.051) with a trend toward significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective indication was associated with fewer complications than PN for relative or absolute indications.