Fralick Michael, Hicks Lisa K, Chaudhry Hina, Goldberg Nicola, Ackery Alun, Nisenbaum Rosane, Sholzberg Michelle
Department of Medicine, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 May 2;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u221651.w8161. eCollection 2017.
The PT/INR (prothrombin time/international normalized ratio) and aPTT (activated partial thromboplastin time) were tests developed in the early 20th century for specific and unique indications. Despite this, they are often ordered together routinely. The objective of this study was to determine if a multimodal intervention could reduce PT/INR and aPTT testing in the emergency department (ED). This was a prospective multi-pronged quality improvement study at St. Michael's Hospital. The initiative involved stakeholder engagement, uncoupling of PT/INR and aPTT testing, teaching, and most importantly a revision to the ED order panels. After changes to order panels, weekly rates of PT/INR and aPTT testing per 100 ED patients decreased (17.2 vs 38.4, rate ratio=0.45 (95% CI 0.43-0.47), p<0.001; 16.6 vs 37.8, rate ratio=0.44 (95% CI 0.42-0.46), p<0.001, respectively). Rate of creatinine testing per 100 ED patients, our internal control, increased during the same period (54.0 vs 49.7, rate ratio=1.09 (95% CI 1.06-1.12); p<0.0001) while the weekly rate per 100 ED patients receiving blood transfusions slightly decreased (0.5 vs 0.7, rate ratio=0.66 (95% CI 0.49-0.87), p=0.0034). We found that a simple process change to order panels was associated with meaningful reductions in coagulation testing without obvious adverse effects.
凝血酶原时间/国际标准化比值(PT/INR)和活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)是20世纪早期针对特定且独特的适应症开发的检测项目。尽管如此,它们仍经常被常规地一起开具检查单。本研究的目的是确定多模式干预是否可以减少急诊科(ED)的PT/INR和aPTT检测。这是一项在圣迈克尔医院进行的前瞻性多方面质量改进研究。该举措包括利益相关者参与、PT/INR和aPTT检测的分离、教学,最重要的是对急诊科检查单进行修订。在对检查单进行更改后,每100名急诊科患者的PT/INR和aPTT每周检测率下降(分别为17.2对38.4,率比=0.45(95%CI 0.43 - 0.47),p<0.001;16.6对37.8,率比=0.44(95%CI 0.42 - 0.46),p<0.001)。作为我们内部对照的每100名急诊科患者的肌酐检测率在同一时期有所增加(54.0对49.7,率比=1.09(95%CI 1.06 - 1.12);p<0.0001),而每100名接受输血的急诊科患者的每周检测率略有下降(0.5对0.7,率比=0.66(95%CI 0.49 - 0.87),p = 0.0034)。我们发现,对检查单进行简单的流程更改与凝血检测的显著减少相关,且无明显不良影响。