School of Kinesiology & Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division St, Kingston K7L 3N6, Ontario, Canada.
School of Kinesiology & Health Studies, Queen's University, 28 Division St, Kingston K7L 3N6, Ontario, Canada; Department of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
J Affect Disord. 2017 Aug 15;218:131-152. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.043. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
Social interventions that aim to facilitate bonds and interaction among individuals could reduce depression at a population level; yet, the scope and effectiveness of these interventions remain unclear. This systematic review classifies and reports on social interventions that have been implemented to target depression in adults.
Search terms related to 'intervention', 'depression', and 'social' were entered into databases, including: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and TRoPHI. Inclusion criteria included: (1) depression was an intervention outcome, (2) depression was not attributable to concomitant illnesses or circumstances (e.g., chronic illness or exposure to natural disasters), (3) the intervention facilitated social interaction, (4) the intervention targeted adults (18-64), (5) the sample was community-based, (6) the study was available in English, and (7) within-group or between-group comparison group information was available.
Of the 24 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, 17 reported reductions in depressive symptoms. Social interventions often incorporated multiple strategies to improve depressive symptoms, including: peer support (n=17), skill building (n=11), group-based activities (n =11), psycho-education (n =9), psychotherapy (n =5), exercise (n =5), and links to community resources (n=3).
Findings of this review may not be generalizable to specific population subgroups with depression, including those who have chronic illnesses or postpartum depression.
Various types of social interventions can be effective in reducing adult depression. Social interventions can be tailored to diverse groups, are feasible in resource-scarce communities, and have the potential to reduce population-level depression due to their group formats.
旨在促进个体之间联系和互动的社会干预措施可能会降低人群的抑郁水平;然而,这些干预措施的范围和效果仍不清楚。本系统评价对旨在针对成年人抑郁的社会干预措施进行分类和报告。
将与“干预”、“抑郁”和“社会”相关的检索词输入数据库,包括:Cochrane 系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、PsycInfo、CINAHL 和 TRoPHI。纳入标准包括:(1)抑郁是干预的结果,(2)抑郁不是由同时存在的疾病或情况引起的(例如,慢性疾病或自然灾害暴露),(3)干预促进了社会互动,(4)干预针对成年人(18-64 岁),(5)样本来自社区,(6)研究为英文,(7)有组内或组间比较组信息。
符合纳入标准的 24 项研究中有 17 项报告了抑郁症状的减轻。社会干预措施通常采用多种策略来改善抑郁症状,包括:同伴支持(n=17)、技能培养(n=11)、小组活动(n=11)、心理教育(n=9)、心理治疗(n=5)、运动(n=5)和社区资源链接(n=3)。
本综述的结果可能不适用于特定的抑郁亚组人群,包括患有慢性疾病或产后抑郁的人群。
各种类型的社会干预措施可有效降低成年人的抑郁水平。社会干预措施可以针对不同的群体进行调整,在资源匮乏的社区中是可行的,并且由于其团体形式,有可能降低人群的抑郁水平。