Burrell Mark W, Barton Jo, Reinhardt Gina Yannitell, Wood Carly J
University of Essex, UK.
J Health Psychol. 2024 Oct 10;30(8):13591053241270410. doi: 10.1177/13591053241270410.
Nature-based interventions (NBIs) are becoming a common mental health care referral option; however, little is known about the barriers to participation. Research reveals a concentration of evidence on the practical barriers with a paucity of guidance on the personal barriers as experienced by service users. This review explores what is known on the psychological, psychosocial and physical barriers as disclosed by adult mental health service users and the various stakeholders involved in NBI. Nine of the 104 articles screened met the inclusion criteria. The review identified a total of 47 barriers in which the majority were standalone barriers unique to the individual article or participant that generated them. However, other barriers suggest a level of universality with the greatest array of barriers identified in the psychosocial category. The review highlights an urgent need for further research on the psychological, psychosocial and physical barriers to NBI participation.
基于自然的干预措施(NBIs)正成为一种常见的心理健康护理转诊选择;然而,对于参与的障碍却知之甚少。研究表明,证据集中在实际障碍方面,而对于服务使用者所经历的个人障碍的指导却很少。本综述探讨了成年心理健康服务使用者以及参与基于自然的干预措施的各利益相关方所披露的心理、心理社会和身体障碍。在筛选的104篇文章中,有9篇符合纳入标准。该综述共确定了47个障碍,其中大多数是个别文章或产生这些障碍的参与者所特有的独立障碍。然而,其他障碍显示出一定程度的普遍性,心理社会类别中确定的障碍种类最多。该综述强调迫切需要进一步研究基于自然的干预措施参与的心理、心理社会和身体障碍。