Wiik Anatole Vilhelm, Aqil Adeel, Brevadt Mads, Jones Gareth, Cobb Justin
Anatole Vilhelm Wiik, MSk Lab, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Charing Cross Hospital, London W68RF, United Kingdom.
World J Orthop. 2017 Apr 18;8(4):322-328. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.322.
To analyse ground reaction forces at higher speeds using another method to be more sensitive in assessing significant gait abnormalities.
A total of 44 subjects, consisting of 24 knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients and 20 healthy controls were analysed. The knee OA patients were recruited from an orthopaedic clinic that were awaiting knee replacement. All subjects had their gait patterns during stance phase at top walking speed assessed on a validated treadmill instrumented with tandem force plates. Temporal measurements and ground reaction forces (GRFs) along with a novel impulse technique were collected for both limbs and a symmetry ratio was applied to all variables to assess inter-limb asymmetry. All continuous variables for each group were compared using a student -test and χ analysis for categorical variables with significance set at α = 0.05. Receiver operator characteristics curves were utilised to determine best discriminating ability.
The knee OA patients were older (66 ± 7 years 53 ± 9 years, = 0.01) and heavier (body mass index: 31 ± 6 23 ± 7, < 0.001) but had a similar gender ratio when compared to the control group. Knee OA patients were predictably slower at top walking speed (1.37 ± 0.23 m/s 2.00 ± 0.20 m/s, < 0.0001) with shorter mean step length (79 ± 12 cm 99 ± 8 cm, < 0.0001) and broader gait width (14 ± 5 cm 11 ± 3 cm, = 0.015) than controls without any known lower-limb joint disease. At a matched mean speed (1.37 ± 0.23 1.34 ± 0.07), ground reaction results revealed that push-off forces and impulse were significantly ( < 0.0001) worse (18% and 12% respectively) for the knee OA patients when compared to the controls. Receiver operating characteristic curves analysis demonstrated total impulse to be the best discriminator of asymmetry, with an area under the curve of 0.902, with a cut-off of -3% and a specificity of 95% and sensitivity of 88%.
Abnormal GRFs in knee osteoarthritis are clearly evident at higher speeds. Analysing GRFs with another method may explain the general decline in knee OA patient's gait.
使用另一种方法分析更高速度下的地面反作用力,以便在评估明显的步态异常时更具敏感性。
共分析了44名受试者,其中包括24名膝骨关节炎(OA)患者和20名健康对照者。膝骨关节炎患者从一家等待膝关节置换的骨科诊所招募。所有受试者在配备串联测力板的经过验证的跑步机上,以最高步行速度评估其站立期的步态模式。收集了双下肢的时间测量值、地面反作用力(GRFs)以及一种新的冲量技术,并对所有变量应用对称比来评估双下肢不对称性。使用学生t检验比较每组的所有连续变量,对分类变量进行χ分析,显著性设定为α = 0.05。利用受试者工作特征曲线来确定最佳鉴别能力。
与对照组相比,膝骨关节炎患者年龄更大(66±7岁对53±9岁,P = 0.01)且体重更重(体重指数:31±6对23±7,P < 0.001),但性别比例相似。膝骨关节炎患者在最高步行速度时明显较慢(1.37±0.23米/秒对2.00±0.20米/秒,P < 0.0001),平均步长较短(79±12厘米对99±8厘米,P < 0.0001),步态宽度比无任何已知下肢关节疾病的对照组更宽(14±5厘米对11±3厘米,P = 0.015)。在匹配的平均速度(1.37±0.23对1.34±0.07)下,地面反作用力结果显示,与对照组相比,膝骨关节炎患者的蹬离力和冲量显著更差(P < 0.0001)(分别差18%和12%)。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,总冲量是不对称性的最佳鉴别指标,曲线下面积为0.902,截断值为 -3%,特异性为95%,敏感性为88%。
膝骨关节炎患者在更高速度下地面反作用力异常明显。用另一种方法分析地面反作用力可能解释膝骨关节炎患者步态的普遍下降。