Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology, 607 Fenster Hall, University Height, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Department of Preclinical Imaging and Radiopharmacy, Werner Siemens Imaging Center, Eberhard Karls University of Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Nov;222(8):3833-3845. doi: 10.1007/s00429-017-1438-7. Epub 2017 May 4.
Relationships between spatially remote brain regions in human have typically been estimated by moment-to-moment correlations of blood-oxygen-level dependent signals in resting-state using functional MRI (fMRI). Recently, studies using subject-to-subject covariance of anatomical volumes, cortical thickness, and metabolic activity are becoming increasingly popular. However, question remains on whether these measures reflect the same inter-region connectivity and brain network organizations. In the current study, we systematically analyzed inter-subject volumetric covariance from anatomical MRI images, metabolic covariance from fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images from 193 healthy subjects, and resting-state moment-to-moment correlations from fMRI images of a subset of 44 subjects. The correlation matrices calculated from the three methods were found to be minimally correlated, with higher correlation in the range of 0.31, as well as limited proportion of overlapping connections. The volumetric network showed the highest global efficiency and lowest mean clustering coefficient, leaning toward random-like network, while the metabolic and resting-state networks conveyed properties more resembling small-world networks. Community structures of the volumetric and metabolic networks did not reflect known functional organizations, which could be observed in resting-state network. The current results suggested that inter-subject volumetric and metabolic covariance do not necessarily reflect the inter-regional relationships and network organizations as resting-state correlations, thus calling for cautions on interpreting results of inter-subject covariance networks.
人类大脑中空间上遥远的区域之间的关系通常是通过静息态 fMRI 中血氧水平依赖信号的实时相关性来估计的。最近,使用受试者间解剖体积、皮质厚度和代谢活动协方差的研究越来越受欢迎。然而,这些测量方法是否反映了相同的区域间连接和大脑网络组织,仍然存在疑问。在本研究中,我们系统地分析了来自 193 名健康受试者的解剖 MRI 图像的受试者间体积协方差、氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描图像的代谢协方差,以及来自 44 名受试者子集的静息状态实时相关性。三种方法计算的相关矩阵相关性最小,相关系数在 0.31 左右,重叠连接的比例有限。体积网络的全局效率最高,平均聚类系数最低,倾向于随机网络,而代谢和静息状态网络则具有更类似于小世界网络的特性。体积和代谢网络的社区结构并不反映已知的功能组织,而在静息状态网络中可以观察到这些组织。目前的结果表明,受试者间体积和代谢协方差并不一定反映静息状态相关性的区域间关系和网络组织,因此在解释受试者间协方差网络的结果时需要谨慎。