Shen Zong-Shan, Li Jin-Song, Chen Wei-Liang, Fan Song
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Malignant Tumor Epigenetics and Gene Regulation of Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2017 May;18(5):31. doi: 10.1007/s11864-017-0471-3.
The management of cervical lymph node metastasis remains a crucial component of the treatment of head and neck cancers. However, the proper management of clinical N cases with early-stage oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains undefined. In the advent of minimally invasive techniques in the 1980s, these techniques have gained popularity among numerous surgeons in all fields of surgery. Although there are no randomized controlled trial data comparing the outcomes of minimally invasive techniques (endoscopically assisted selective neck dissection (SND), robot-assisted SND) with conventional techniques, encouraging evidence from several studies suggests that both endoscopically assisted SND and robot-assisted SND are safe, minimally invasive techniques with achieved short-term oncologic outcomes and can reach a better cosmetic outcome than conventional SND. In this review, we also compare the indications, surgical approaches, and relative advantages and disadvantages of conventional SND, endoscopically assisted SND, and robot-assisted SND to provide surgeons with a means to better consider these techniques for the treatment of early-stage OSCC.
颈部淋巴结转移的管理仍然是头颈癌治疗的关键组成部分。然而,早期口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)临床N病例的恰当管理仍不明确。在20世纪80年代微创技术出现后,这些技术在所有外科领域的众多外科医生中受到欢迎。尽管尚无随机对照试验数据比较微创技术(内镜辅助选择性颈清扫术(SND)、机器人辅助SND)与传统技术的结果,但多项研究的令人鼓舞的证据表明,内镜辅助SND和机器人辅助SND都是安全的微创技术,能取得短期肿瘤学结果,且与传统SND相比能达到更好的美容效果。在本综述中,我们还比较了传统SND、内镜辅助SND和机器人辅助SND的适应症、手术方法以及相对优缺点,为外科医生提供一种方法,以便更好地考虑这些技术用于早期OSCC的治疗。