• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴勒斯坦的情绪表达规则:内群体/外群体成员身份、互动伙伴的地位及性别。

Emotional display rules in Palestine: Ingroup/outgroup membership, status of interaction partner and gender.

作者信息

Flicker Sharon M, Ayoub Haneen J S, Guynn Melissa J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Antioch College, Yellow Springs, OH, USA.

Asian University for Women, Chittagong, Bangladesh.

出版信息

Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):33-41. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12429. Epub 2017 May 5.

DOI:10.1002/ijop.12429
PMID:28474407
Abstract

This study investigates emotional display rules within the Palestinian context, focusing on the seven basic emotions in a sample of 150 college students from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. Overall, participants felt that it was more appropriate to express positive emotions (happiness and surprise) than negative powerful (anger, contempt and disgust) or negative powerless (fear and sadness) emotions. They also perceived it to be more appropriate to express positive and negative powerless emotions to ingroup than outgroup members and to express negative powerful emotions to lower status compared to higher status individuals. Gender differences were also found: men endorsed greater expression of both powerful and, surprisingly, powerless emotions than women, but only when interacting with outgroup members. Results are interpreted in terms of the cultural values of individualism-collectivism and power distance as well as cultural differences in emotional expressiveness between collectivistic societies. This study is one of the first to examine emotional display rules in an Arab population, thus expanding our current knowledge base.

摘要

本研究调查了巴勒斯坦背景下的情绪表达规则,重点关注来自加沙地带和西岸的150名大学生样本中的七种基本情绪。总体而言,参与者认为表达积极情绪(快乐和惊讶)比表达消极的强烈情绪(愤怒、轻蔑和厌恶)或消极的无力情绪(恐惧和悲伤)更为合适。他们还认为,与外群体成员相比,向群体内成员表达积极和消极的无力情绪更为合适;与地位较高的个体相比,向地位较低的个体表达消极的强烈情绪更为合适。研究还发现了性别差异:男性比女性更倾向于表达强烈情绪,令人惊讶的是,在与外群体成员互动时,男性也更倾向于表达无力情绪。研究结果从个人主义-集体主义的文化价值观、权力距离以及集体主义社会之间情绪表达的文化差异等方面进行了解释。本研究是首批对阿拉伯人群体的情绪表达规则进行研究的项目之一,从而扩展了我们目前的知识库。

相似文献

1
Emotional display rules in Palestine: Ingroup/outgroup membership, status of interaction partner and gender.巴勒斯坦的情绪表达规则:内群体/外群体成员身份、互动伙伴的地位及性别。
Int J Psychol. 2019 Feb;54(1):33-41. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12429. Epub 2017 May 5.
2
Intergroup emotional exchange: Ingroup guilt and outgroup anger increase resource allocation in trust games.群体间情感交流:内群体内疚感和外群体愤怒感会增加信任游戏中的资源分配。
Emotion. 2019 Jun;19(4):605-616. doi: 10.1037/emo0000463. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
3
Relationships among individualism--collectivism, gender, and ingroup/outgroup status, and responses to conflict: a study in China and the United States.个体主义-集体主义、性别、内群体/外群体地位与冲突反应的关系:在中国和美国的研究。
Aggress Behav. 2011 Jul-Aug;37(4):302-14. doi: 10.1002/ab.20395. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
4
Convergent and divergent responses to emotional displays of ingroup and outgroup.对内群体和外群体情绪表达的趋同和分歧反应。
Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):286-98. doi: 10.1037/a0022582.
5
Positivity bias in judging ingroup members' emotional expressions.判断内群体成员情绪表达时的积极性偏见。
Emotion. 2016 Dec;16(8):1117-1125. doi: 10.1037/emo0000227. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
A three-dimensional model of emotional display rules: Model invariance, external validity, and gender differences.情绪表达规则的三维模型:模型不变性、外部有效性和性别差异。
Emotion. 2023 Aug;23(5):1410-1422. doi: 10.1037/emo0001176. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
7
Existential threat and responses to emotional displays of ingroup and outgroup members.生存威胁以及对群体内和群体外成员情绪表露的反应。
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2023 Dec;26(8):1866-1887. doi: 10.1177/13684302221128229. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
8
Gender and culture differences in emotion.情绪中的性别与文化差异。
Emotion. 2004 Mar;4(1):87-94. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.1.87.
9
Can you forgive? It depends on how happy you are.你能原谅吗?这取决于你有多幸福。
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Apr;56(2):182-8. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12185. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
10
Emotion and aggressive intergroup cognitions: The ANCODI hypothesis.情绪与攻击性群体间认知:ANCODI假说。
Aggress Behav. 2017 Jan;43(1):93-107. doi: 10.1002/ab.21666. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cultural adaptation of an internet-based self-help app for grieving Syrian refugees in Switzerland.基于互联网的自助应用程序对在瑞士的叙利亚难民进行文化适应性调整。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):3048. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20507-8.
2
Communication rules regarding support seeking in patients with a physical illness, according to people with a Surinamese or a Dutch cultural background.根据具有苏里南或荷兰文化背景的人群,关于身患躯体疾病患者寻求支持的沟通规则。
J Migr Health. 2024 May 6;9:100235. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100235. eCollection 2024.