Hlaing N K T, Mitrani R A, Aung S T, Phyo W W, Serper M, Kyaw A M M, Bwa A H, Win K M, Reddy K R
Department of Hepatology, Mandalay General Hospital, Mandalay, Myanmar.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Viral Hepat. 2017 Nov;24(11):927-935. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12721. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
This open-label, clinical experience investigated the safety and efficacy of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy in Myanmar; 344 patients completed treatment between June 2015 and May 2016. Patients with HCV genotypes 1-4 and 6 received one of four treatments: (i) Peg-interferon (PEG-IFN)+sofosbuvir (SOF)+ribavirin (RBV) for 12 weeks, (ii) SOF+RBV for 24 weeks, (iii) ledipasvir (LDV)+SOF for 12 weeks or (iv) daclatasvir (DCV)+SOF+RBV for 12 or 24 weeks. Genotype 3 was most common (n=133, 38.7%), followed by genotype 6 (n=122, 35.5%) and genotype 1 (n=86, 25%). Overall, 91% of patients achieved sustained virologic response (SVR); 99% in group 1, (n=148/149), 90% in group 2 (n=95/106), 78% in group 3 (n=65/83) and 100% in group 4 (n=6/6). In group 3, SVR rates were 96.8% in genotype 1 (n=30/31) and 64.1% in genotype 6 (n=25/39). Multivariable regression analysis identified advanced fibrosis (F3-4) (OR=.16 CI: 0.05-0.57, P=.005), genotype 6 (OR=.35, CI: 0.16-0.79, P=.012) and diabetes (OR=.29, CI: 0.12-0.71, P=.007) as negative independent predictors of response. Adverse events were mild with all-oral therapy.
DAA therapy ±PEG-IFN achieved high SVR rates. Genotype 6 patients had a low SVR to 12 weeks of LDV and SOF raising the need for other regimens, RBV or longer treatment duration in this population.
这项开放标签的临床经验研究了直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗缅甸丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)的安全性和有效性;2015年6月至2016年5月期间,344例患者完成了治疗。HCV基因1-4型和6型的患者接受了以下四种治疗方案之一:(i)聚乙二醇干扰素(PEG-IFN)+索磷布韦(SOF)+利巴韦林(RBV)治疗12周,(ii)SOF+RBV治疗24周,(iii)来迪派韦(LDV)+SOF治疗12周,或(iv)达卡他韦(DCV)+SOF+RBV治疗12或24周。基因3型最为常见(n=133,38.7%),其次是基因6型(n=122,35.5%)和基因1型(n=86,25%)。总体而言,91%的患者实现了持续病毒学应答(SVR);第1组为99%(n=148/149),第2组为90%(n=95/106),第3组为78%(n=65/83),第4组为100%(n=6/6)。在第3组中,基因1型的SVR率为96.8%(n=30/31),基因6型为64.1%(n=25/39)。多变量回归分析确定晚期纤维化(F3-4)(OR=0.16,CI:0.05-0.57,P=0.005)、基因6型(OR=0.35,CI:0.16-0.79,P=0.012)和糖尿病(OR=0.29,CI:0.12-0.71,P=0.007)为应答的负性独立预测因素。全口服治疗的不良事件较轻。
DAA治疗±PEG-IFN实现了较高的SVR率。基因6型患者接受12周LDV和SOF治疗的SVR率较低,这表明该人群需要其他治疗方案、RBV或更长的治疗疗程。