Department of Toxicology and Biomonitoring, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Rue du Morvan, CS 60027, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Scientific Management, Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité, Rue du Morvan, CS 60027, Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy, France.
Ann Work Expo Health. 2017 Jun 1;61(5):515-527. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxx031.
Biological limit values (BLV) are often determined from the occupational exposure limits (OEL) in modelling biological data obtained on a number of exposed subjects based on measurements of air exposure. In order to obtain such BLVs, biomonitoring studies are conducted collecting simultaneously biological and airborne measurements to these substances in exposed workers. One obstacle in the modelling of such data is the often large number of values below the limit of detection (LOD) for both biological and airborne measurements (left-censored measurements). A second difficulty, which is also a strength, is that multiple measurements are obtained for the same workers, leading to non-independence of the data. In this paper, we propose a statistical method based on Bayesian theory making use of measurements below the LOD for both dependent (biological) and independent (air exposure) data, and taking into account multiple measurements on the same worker. This method relies on the modelling of the airborne exposure measurements using standard random effect models adapted for values below LOD and the simultaneous modelling of the biological measurements assumed to be linearly (on the log scale) related to the airborne exposure while accounting for between-worker variability. This method is validated by a simulation study in which up to 50% of the measurements are censored for both variables in realistic settings. This simulation study shows that the proposed method is uniformly more efficient than the candidate alternative we considered (maximum likelihood estimation; MLE method) that did not make use of a data with airborne measurements below the LOD. When the method is applied on a real biomonitoring data set among electroplating workers exposed to chromium with 54% censored airborne measurements and 20% censored urinary measurements, the slope is steeper when incorporating these data using the proposed Bayesian method leading to different BLV estimations depending on the OEL used.
生物极限值 (BLV) 通常是根据对大量暴露于某种物质的受试者进行空气暴露测量所获得的生物数据,从职业暴露限值 (OEL) 推导得出的。为了获得这些 BLV,需要进行生物监测研究,同时收集暴露于这些物质的工人的生物和空气暴露测量数据。在对这些数据进行建模时,存在一个障碍,即生物和空气测量值(左截断测量值)中低于检出限 (LOD) 的值往往很多。第二个困难也是一个优势,即对同一工人进行了多次测量,导致数据不独立。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于贝叶斯理论的统计方法,该方法利用了生物和独立(空气暴露)数据中低于 LOD 的测量值,并考虑了同一工人的多次测量。该方法依赖于使用标准随机效应模型对空气暴露测量值进行建模,该模型适用于低于 LOD 的值,同时对生物测量值进行建模,假设其与空气暴露呈线性(在对数尺度上)相关,同时考虑了工人之间的变异性。该方法通过在现实环境中对两种变量高达 50%的测量值进行了模拟研究,从而得到了验证。该模拟研究表明,与我们考虑的不使用低于 LOD 的空气暴露测量数据的候选替代方法(最大似然估计;MLE 方法)相比,该方法具有一致的优势。当该方法应用于电镀工人接触铬的真实生物监测数据集时,其中有 54%的空气暴露测量值和 20%的尿液测量值被截尾,当使用贝叶斯方法纳入这些数据时,斜率变得更陡,从而导致不同的 BLV 估计值取决于所使用的 OEL。