Pearson Jaclyn S, Murphy James M
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Australia.
The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Cell Microbiol. 2017 Aug;19(8). doi: 10.1111/cmi.12750. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
Pathogenic microbes have evolved countless sophisticated mechanisms to subvert host immune responses and cause disease. Understanding evasion strategies employed by pathogens has led to numerous discoveries on specific host cell processes that are critical for controlling infection. Programmed cell death (PCD) is a key host defence to microbial infection, as well as being critical for organ development and cellular homeostasis in multicellular organisms. Much of our current understanding of PCD as a host response to infection has stemmed from the discovery and study of viral inhibitors of apoptosis, and more recently viral inhibition of the newly characterised from of PCD termed necroptosis, the mechanisms of which are still under intense investigation. Many bacterial pathogens also encode inhibitors of PCD, yet these discoveries are relatively more recent and thus the biological significance of such mechanisms is still under debate. In this viewpoint article, we will argue the concept that necroptosis is merely a "back-up" mechanism in the event that apoptosis is inhibited, or whether it is a true host innate response to infection that has evolved in response to a growing arsenal of microbial evasion strategies.
致病微生物已经进化出无数复杂的机制来破坏宿主的免疫反应并引发疾病。了解病原体所采用的逃避策略已促使人们在特定宿主细胞过程方面有了众多发现,而这些过程对于控制感染至关重要。程序性细胞死亡(PCD)是宿主抵御微生物感染的关键防御机制,同时对于多细胞生物体中的器官发育和细胞稳态也至关重要。我们目前对PCD作为宿主对感染的反应的许多理解都源于对凋亡病毒抑制剂的发现和研究,以及最近对新发现的称为坏死性凋亡的PCD形式的病毒抑制的研究,其机制仍在深入研究中。许多细菌病原体也编码PCD抑制剂,但这些发现相对较新,因此这种机制的生物学意义仍在争论中。在这篇观点文章中,我们将探讨坏死性凋亡仅仅是在凋亡被抑制时的一种“备用”机制,还是它是一种真正的宿主对感染的固有反应,这种反应是为了应对不断增加的微生物逃避策略而进化出来的这一概念。