Division of Neonatal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, LAC+USC Medical Center and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of Neonatal Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, LAC+USC Medical Center and Children's Hospital of Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Resuscitation. 2017 Jul;116:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 May 2.
The literature supports minimizing duration of invasive ventilation to decrease lung injury in premature infants. Neonatal Resuscitation Program recommended use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) in delivery room for infants requiring prolonged respiratory support.
To evaluate the impact of implementation of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) using nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) for resuscitation in very low birth infants.
Retrospective study was performed after NIPPV was introduced in the delivery room and compared with infants receiving face mask to provide positive pressure ventilation for resuscitation of very low birth weight infants prior to its use. Data collected from 119 infants resuscitated using NIPPV and 102 infants resuscitated with a face mask in a single institution. The primary outcome was the need for endotracheal intubation in the delivery room. Data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics software version 24.
A total of 31% of infants were intubated in the delivery room in the NIPPV group compared to 85% in the Face mask group (p=<0.001). Chest compression rates were 11% in the NIPPV group and 31% in the Face mask group (p<0.001). Epinephrine administration was also lower in NIPPV group (2% vs. 8%; P=0.03). Only 38% infants remained intubated at 24hours of age in the NIPPV group compared to 66% in the Face mask group (p<0.001). Median duration of invasive ventilation in the NIPPV group was shorter (2days) compared to the Face mask group (11days) (p=0.01). The incidence of air-leaks was not significant between the two groups.
NIPPV was safely and effectively used in the delivery room settings to provide respiratory support for VLBW infants with less need for intubation, chest compressions, epinephrine administration and subsequent invasive ventilation.
文献支持将有创通气时间最小化,以减少早产儿的肺损伤。新生儿复苏计划建议在产房使用无创通气(NIV)为需要长时间呼吸支持的婴儿提供支持。
评估在极低出生体重儿复苏中使用经鼻间歇正压通气(NIPPV)进行无创通气(NIV)的效果。
在产房引入 NIPPV 后进行回顾性研究,并与使用面罩提供正压通气为复苏的极低出生体重儿进行比较。在单一机构中,为 119 名使用 NIPPV 复苏的婴儿和 102 名使用面罩复苏的婴儿收集数据。主要结局是在产房内需要进行气管内插管。使用 IBM SPSS Statistics 软件版本 24 分析数据。
NIPPV 组中,有 31%的婴儿在产房内需要插管,而面罩组中这一比例为 85%(p<0.001)。NIPPV 组的胸外按压率为 11%,而面罩组为 31%(p<0.001)。NIPPV 组肾上腺素的使用率也较低(2%比 8%;P=0.03)。在 NIPPV 组中,只有 38%的婴儿在 24 小时龄时仍需要插管,而面罩组为 66%(p<0.001)。NIPPV 组的有创通气时间中位数较短(2 天),而面罩组为 11 天(p=0.01)。两组之间的气胸发生率无显著差异。
NIPPV 可安全有效地用于产房环境,为极低出生体重儿提供呼吸支持,减少插管、胸外按压、肾上腺素给药和随后的有创通气的需求。