Mak Jennifer Sze Man, Chung Cathy Hoi Sze, Chung Jacqueline Pui Wah, Kong Grace Wing Shan, Saravelos Sotirios H, Cheung Lai Ping, Li Tin-Chiu
Assisted Reproduction Technology Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Assisted Reproduction Technology Unit, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Jul;35(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
The benefit of endometrial scratch (ES) prior to embryo transfer is controversial. Systemic analysis has confirmed its potential benefit, especially in women with repeated IVF failures, yet most studies have focused on fresh embryo transfer, and its effect on vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (FET) cycles is yet to be explored. We hereby present our prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled study on the evaluation of the implantation and pregnancy rate after ES prior to natural-cycle FET. A total of 299 patients underwent natural-cycle FET and were randomized to receive ES (n = 115) or endocervical manipulation as control (n = 114) prior to FET cycle, and a total of 196 patients had embryo transfer (93 patients in each group). Our study showed no significant difference in the implantation and pregnancy rate, as well as the clinical and ongoing pregnancy or live birth rates between the two groups. It appears that ES does not have any beneficial effect on an unselected group of women undergoing FET in natural cycles. Further studies on its effect in women with recurrent implantation failure after IVF are warranted.
胚胎移植前进行子宫内膜搔刮(ES)的益处存在争议。系统分析证实了其潜在益处,尤其是在反复试管婴儿失败的女性中,但大多数研究集中于新鲜胚胎移植,其对玻璃化冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期的影响尚待探索。我们在此展示我们关于自然周期FET前ES后着床率和妊娠率评估的前瞻性、双盲、随机对照研究。共有299例患者接受自然周期FET,并在FET周期前随机分为接受ES组(n = 115)或宫颈操作作为对照组(n = 114),共有196例患者进行了胚胎移植(每组93例患者)。我们的研究表明,两组之间在着床率、妊娠率以及临床妊娠、持续妊娠或活产率方面均无显著差异。看来ES对自然周期接受FET的未选择女性群体没有任何有益作用。有必要进一步研究其对试管婴儿后反复着床失败女性的影响。