Chun Se-Woong, Lim Chai-Young, Kim Keewon, Hwang Jinseub, Chung Sun G
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Seongsan-gu, Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Republic of Korea 51472.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Spine J. 2017 Aug;17(8):1180-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.034. Epub 2017 May 2.
Clinicians regard lumbar lordotic curvature (LLC) with respect to low back pain (LBP) in a contradictory fashion. The time-honored point of view is that LLC itself, or its increment, causes LBP. On the other hand, recently, the biomechanical role of LLC has been emphasized, and loss of lordosis is considered a possible cause of LBP. The relationship between LLC and LBP has immense clinical significance, because it serves as the basis of therapeutic exercises for treating and preventing LBP.
This study aimed to (1) determine the difference in LLC in those with and without LBP and (2) investigate confounding factors that might affect the association between LLC and LBP.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
The inclusion criteria consisted of observational studies that included information on lumbar lordotic angle (LLA) assessed by radiological image, in both patients with LBP and healthy controls. Studies solely involving pediatric populations, or addressing spinal conditions of nondegenerative causes, were excluded.
A systematic electronic search of Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science using terms related to lumbar alignment and Boolean logic was performed: (lumbar lordo*) or (lumbar alignment) or (sagittal alignment) or (sagittal balance). Standardized mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated, and chi-square and I statistics were used to assess within-group heterogeneity by random effects model. Additionally, the age and gender of participants, spinal disease entity, and the severity and duration of LBP were evaluated as possible confounding factors.
A total of 13 studies consisting of 796 patients with LBP and 927 healthy controls were identified. Overall, patients with LBP tended to have smaller LLA than healthy controls. However, the studies were heterogeneous. In the meta-regression analysis, the factors of age, severity of LBP, and spinal disease entity were revealed to contribute significantly to variance between studies. In the subgroup analysis of the five studies that compared patients with disc herniation or degeneration with healthy controls, patients with LBP had smaller LLA (SMD: -0.94, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.69), with sufficient homogeneity based on significance level of .1 (I=45.7%, p=.118). In the six age-matched studies, patients with LBP had smaller LLA than healthy controls (SMD: -0.33, 95% CI: -0.46 to -0.21), without statistical heterogeneity (I=0%, p=.916).
This meta-analysis demonstrates a strong relationship between LBP and decreased LLC, especially when compared with age-matched healthy controls. Among specific diseases, LBP by disc herniation or degeneration was shown to be substantially associated with the loss of LLC.
临床医生对腰椎前凸曲度(LLC)与腰痛(LBP)的关系看法不一。长期以来的观点认为,LLC本身或其增加会导致腰痛。另一方面,最近,LLC的生物力学作用得到了强调,腰椎前凸消失被认为是腰痛的一个可能原因。LLC与LBP之间的关系具有重大的临床意义,因为它是治疗和预防腰痛的治疗性锻炼的基础。
本研究旨在(1)确定有和没有腰痛的人群中LLC的差异,以及(2)调查可能影响LLC与LBP之间关联的混杂因素。
系统评价和荟萃分析。
纳入标准包括观察性研究,这些研究包括通过放射影像评估的腰椎前凸角(LLA)信息,研究对象为腰痛患者和健康对照。仅涉及儿科人群或非退行性原因的脊柱疾病的研究被排除。
使用与腰椎排列相关的术语和布尔逻辑,对Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、CINAHL、Scopus、PEDro和Web of Science进行系统的电子检索:(腰椎前凸*)或(腰椎排列)或(矢状排列)或(矢状平衡)。估计标准化平均差(SMD)和95%置信区间(CI),并使用卡方和I统计量通过随机效应模型评估组内异质性。此外,将参与者的年龄和性别、脊柱疾病实体以及腰痛的严重程度和持续时间作为可能的混杂因素进行评估。
共纳入13项研究,包括796例腰痛患者和927例健康对照。总体而言,腰痛患者的LLA往往比健康对照小。然而,这些研究存在异质性。在meta回归分析中,年龄、腰痛严重程度和脊柱疾病实体等因素被发现对研究间的差异有显著贡献。在将椎间盘突出或退变患者与健康对照进行比较的五项研究的亚组分析中,腰痛患者的LLA较小(SMD:-0.94,95%CI:-1.19至-0.69),基于显著性水平0.1具有足够的同质性(I = 45.7%,p = 0.118)。在六项年龄匹配的研究中,腰痛患者的LLA比健康对照小(SMD:-0.33,95%CI:-0.46至-0.21),无统计学异质性(I = 0%,p = 0.916)。
这项荟萃分析表明腰痛与LLC降低之间存在密切关系,尤其是与年龄匹配的健康对照相比。在特定疾病中,椎间盘突出或退变引起的腰痛与LLC的丧失密切相关。