Chan Ellen, Chan Lok-Yi, Fong Hung-Kit, Mak Yiu-To, Kwong Patrick Wai-Hang, Sun Eliza Rui, Yu Clare C W, Tsang Sharon M H
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 3;20(9):e0330609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330609. eCollection 2025.
Backward walking may promote the preferential recruitment of lumbar extensors to optimize flexed spinal posture adopted LBP flexion subgroup. This cross-sectional study investigated the backward-walking exercise on a) real-time muscle activation, and b) its immediate effect on back pain intensity, movement control and lumbopelvic muscle activation in individuals with chronic non-specific LBP characterized with lumbar flexion syndrome.
Thirty adults with chronic non-specific LBP with clinical manifestation of flexion syndrome received assessments of their movement control at static standing and during the five-minute forward walking test, conducted before and after a 15-minute treadmill walking training in forward or backward direction (as the immediate effect), while real-time adaptation of the lumbopelvic muscles during walking training was also evaluated. Comparisons of back pain intensity, ratio of the normalized electromyography (EMG) of the paired lumbopelvic muscles during walking, and performance of the lumbar movement control tests (LMC) using inferential statistics to analyze between- and within-subject effects differences for the a) real-time and b) immediate effects of the single session of walking training designated in a backward direction as compared to forward direction.
Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was adopted to minimize the confounding effect from covariates identified (maximal tolerable gait speed for EMG amplitude analysis, and gender for pain intensity and performance in lumbar movement control (LMC) tests). Significant post-training improvement in pain intensity (p = 0.014) and overall performance of the LMC tests (p = 0.006) were found for those who received backward walking training. Significant overall between-group effect (p = 0.022-0.026) and time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.004-0.022) of ipsilateral internal oblique (IO) to multifidus (MF) ratio were found in swing phases of both legs. For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. Real-time increasing trend during backward walking and real time decreasing trend of ipsilateral MF to ES ratio during forward walking were observed in stance phase of both legs, with time-and-group interaction effect at 6th (p = 0.007) and 12th minute (p = 0.006) during walking training in left stance phase.
Backward walking exercise emerges to benefit LBP patients with lumbar flexion syndrome by inducing real-time increase in back extensors and deep stabilizing muscle recruitment together with the immediate post-training improvement in pain intensity and LMC test performance. Further research with longer training duration and larger sample size are recommended to better understand if greater and more sustainable therapeutic effect can be achieved with the walking exercise in backward direction for this specified LBP subgroup.
倒走可能会促进腰椎伸肌的优先募集,以优化伴有腰椎前屈综合征的慢性非特异性下背痛(LBP)前屈亚组所采用的脊柱前屈姿势。本横断面研究调查了倒走运动对以下方面的影响:a)实时肌肉激活;b)对以腰椎前屈综合征为特征的慢性非特异性LBP患者的背痛强度、运动控制和腰骨盆肌肉激活的即时影响。
30名有前屈综合征临床表现的慢性非特异性LBP成年人在15分钟跑步机向前或向后行走训练(作为即时效应)前后,接受了静态站立和五分钟向前行走测试时的运动控制评估,同时还评估了行走训练期间腰骨盆肌肉的实时适应性。使用推断统计分析单节次向后行走训练与向前行走训练相比,在a)实时和b)即时效应方面,受试者间和受试者内效应差异,比较背痛强度、行走期间配对腰骨盆肌肉归一化肌电图(EMG)的比率,以及腰椎运动控制测试(LMC)的表现。
采用双向重复测量协方差分析(ANCOVA)以最小化已识别协变量的混杂效应(用于EMG幅度分析的最大可耐受步态速度,以及用于疼痛强度和腰椎运动控制(LMC)测试表现的性别)。接受倒走训练的患者在训练后疼痛强度(p = 0.014)和LMC测试的总体表现(p = 0.006)有显著改善。在双腿摆动期,同侧腹内斜肌(IO)与多裂肌(MF)比率存在显著的总体组间效应(p = = 0.022 - 0.026)和时间与组交互效应(p = 0.004 - 0.022)。对于同侧竖脊肌(ES)与腹直肌(RA)比率,存在显著的时间效应(p = 0.02 = 0.022)、组间差异(p = 0.031),以及左摆动期向前行走期间的实时降低,和显著的组间差异(p = 0.024)、时间与组交互效应(p = 0.009),以及右摆动期向后行走期间的实时增加。在双腿站立期观察到倒走期间的实时增加趋势以及向前行走期间同侧MF与ES比率的实时降低趋势,在左站立期行走训练的第6分钟(p = 0.007)和第12分钟(p = 0.006)存在时间与组交互效应。
倒走运动似乎有益于伴有腰椎前屈综合征的LBP患者,通过诱导背部伸肌和深层稳定肌肉募集的实时增加,以及训练后疼痛强度和LMC测试表现的即时改善。建议进行更长训练时长和更大样本量的进一步研究,以更好地了解对于这个特定的LBP亚组,倒走运动是否能实现更大且更可持续的治疗效果。