Clinical Trials and Biostatistics Unit, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland.
Melbourne EpiCentre, University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Diabet Med. 2017 Sep;34(9):1284-1290. doi: 10.1111/dme.13376. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
To evaluate whether plasma glycated albumin, which provides an integrated measure of plasma glucose levels over the preceding 2-4 weeks, better reflects changes in postprandial glucose excursions than HbA .
People with suboptimum glycaemic control on dual oral therapy were enrolled in the Treating-to-Target-in-Type 2 diabetes (4-T) trial, in which participants were randomized to the addition of once-daily basal insulin, twice-daily biphasic insulin or thrice-daily prandial insulin. Glycated albumin levels were assayed enzymatically from baseline and 1-year fasting plasma samples. We evaluated robust correlations of glycated albumin and HbA both with fasting and postprandial glucose levels at these two time points, and with insulin-induced changes in the postprandial excursion.
Requisite data were available for 625 of the participants in the 4-T trial. Their mean (±sd) age was 62 ± 10 years and body weight was 85.8 ± 15.9 kg, and their median (interquartile range) diabetes duration was 9 (6, 13) years. Partial correlations at baseline and 1 year between postprandial glucose excursions and glycated albumin/HbA , after adjusting for fasting glucose, were 0.27/0.15 and 0.22/0.18, respectively. Glycated albumin, compared with HbA , explained 66% more of the variation in postprandial glucose excursions at baseline. At 1 year, postprandial glucose excursions on basal, biphasic and prandial and insulin therapy were reduced by 0.43, 0.78 and 1.88 mmol/l, respectively. These reductions were associated with changes in both glycated albumin and HbA (P < 0.01), with a stronger association for glycated albumin.
Changes in glycated albumin and HbA reflect changes in postprandial glucose excursions to a similar extent.
评估血浆糖化白蛋白(可综合反映过去 2-4 周内的血糖水平)是否比糖化血红蛋白(HbA )更能反映餐后血糖波动的变化。
在旨在使 2 型糖尿病患者血糖达标(4-T)试验中,招募了血糖控制不理想的接受双重口服降糖药物治疗的患者,参与者被随机分配至每日一次基础胰岛素、每日两次预混胰岛素或每日三次餐时胰岛素治疗组。基线和 1 年时空腹血浆样本采用酶法检测糖化白蛋白水平。我们评估了糖化白蛋白和 HbA 与这两个时间点空腹和餐后血糖水平的稳健相关性,以及与餐后血糖波动的胰岛素诱导变化的相关性。
4-T 试验中 625 名患者的数据符合要求。他们的平均(±标准差)年龄为 62±10 岁,体重为 85.8±15.9kg,中位(四分位数间距)糖尿病病程为 9(6,13)年。调整空腹血糖后,基线和 1 年时餐后血糖波动与糖化白蛋白/HbA 的偏相关系数分别为 0.27/0.15 和 0.22/0.18。与 HbA 相比,糖化白蛋白在基线时能更好地解释餐后血糖波动的 66%。1 年时,基础、预混和餐时胰岛素治疗后餐后血糖波动分别降低了 0.43、0.78 和 1.88mmol/L。这些降低与糖化白蛋白和 HbA 的变化相关(P<0.01),与糖化白蛋白的相关性更强。
糖化白蛋白和 HbA 的变化在一定程度上反映了餐后血糖波动的变化。