Crist Brett D, Oladeji Lasun O, Khazzam Michael, Della Rocca Gregory J, Murtha Yvonne M, Stannard James P
University of Missouri, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, One Hospital Drive, N116, Columbia, MO, United States.
University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dallas, TX, United States.
Injury. 2017 Jul;48(7):1518-1521. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
Negative pressure wound therapy use over closed surgical incisions (iNPWT) has proven to be effective at reducing hematoma, wound drainage and infection in high-risk wounds. The purpose of this study was to determine if iNPWT decreased the risk of infection in patients undergoing open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) for acetabular fractures.
71 patients who underwent operative intervention for an acetabular fracture between March 2008 and September 2012 consented and prospectively randomized to iNPWT or a standard postoperative (dry gauze) dressing. The primary endpoint was deep infection, i.e. necessitating surgical debridement. Patients were followed until fracture union.
33 patients were randomized to treatment with a standard gauze dressing and 33 patients were randomized to the iNPWT cohort. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with respect to patient demographics, clinical, or surgery characteristics. Overall, seven patients (10.6%) were diagnosed with infections; two patients (6.1%) in the placebo group and 5 (15.2%) in the treatment group.
In this randomized prospective trial, iNPWT did not decrease the incidence of deep infections when compared to gauze dressings in patients with acetabular fractures. Although not statistically significant, patients in the iNPWT cohort were 2.77 times more likely to develop a deep infection.
在闭合性手术切口上使用负压伤口治疗(iNPWT)已被证明在减少高危伤口的血肿、伤口引流和感染方面有效。本研究的目的是确定iNPWT是否能降低接受髋臼骨折切开复位内固定术(ORIF)患者的感染风险。
2008年3月至2012年9月期间接受髋臼骨折手术干预的71例患者同意并被前瞻性随机分为iNPWT组或标准术后(干纱布)敷料组。主要终点是深部感染,即需要手术清创。对患者进行随访直至骨折愈合。
33例患者被随机分配接受标准纱布敷料治疗,33例患者被随机分配到iNPWT组。两组在患者人口统计学、临床或手术特征方面无统计学显著差异。总体而言,7例患者(10.6%)被诊断为感染;安慰剂组2例患者(6.1%),治疗组5例患者(15.2%)。
在这项随机前瞻性试验中,与髋臼骨折患者使用纱布敷料相比,iNPWT并未降低深部感染的发生率。尽管无统计学显著差异,但iNPWT组患者发生深部感染的可能性是2.77倍。