Suppr超能文献

切口负压伤口治疗装置可改善髋膝关节置换术后短期的伤口并发症,但不能降低长期感染率。

Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Devices Improve Short-Term Wound Complications, but Not Long-Term Infection Rate Following Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2019 Apr;34(4):723-728. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.12.008. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The potential value of incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) on lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) wound healing has been supported in a few retrospective studies. We performed this prospective, randomized, controlled trial to assess the impact of iNPWT on wound appearance, early complications, and late infection rates following hip and knee TJA compared with a standard surgical dressing.

METHODS

Three-hundred ninety-eight patients undergoing primary or revision lower extremity TJA were randomized into iNPWT or conventional wound dressing groups. Wound healing and early complication rates were assessed at 7, 14, and 35 days after the index surgery. Late infection rates were determined at a mean 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Patients treated with an iNPWT device were more likely to report wound drainage at day 7 (P = .01), but less drainage longer than 14 days (P = .04). Wound drainage was significantly higher for total hip arthroplasty patients at day 7 (P = .04), but differences were not sustained through the other time intervals. Total knee arthroplasty patients with a body mass index > 35 kg/m treated with an iNPWT device experienced fewer complications (1.3% vs 21.6%, P < .01) and fewer dressing-related concerns (1.3% vs 10.8%, P = .02) compared with a conventional dressing. No significant difference in late superficial or deep infection rates was identified between iNPWT and conventional dressing groups (4.0% vs 3.4%, P = .8).

CONCLUSION

Our study findings support improved soft tissue healing response with the use of iNPWT devices. While postoperative wound drainage may limit their value following total hip arthroplasty, incisional NPWT devices may have a targeted benefit for elective total knee arthroplasty patients with a body mass index > 35 kg/m. Specific study in this higher-risk patient group may be helpful to define the value of iNPWT.

摘要

背景

几项回顾性研究支持切口负压伤口治疗(iNPWT)对下肢全关节置换术(TJA)伤口愈合的潜在价值。我们进行了这项前瞻性、随机、对照试验,以评估与标准手术敷料相比,iNPWT 对髋关节和膝关节 TJA 后伤口外观、早期并发症和晚期感染率的影响。

方法

398 例接受初次或翻修下肢 TJA 的患者被随机分为 iNPWT 或常规伤口敷料组。在指数手术后 7、14 和 35 天评估伤口愈合和早期并发症发生率。在平均 2 年的随访中确定晚期感染率。

结果

使用 iNPWT 装置的患者在第 7 天更有可能报告伤口引流(P =.01),但引流时间超过 14 天的情况较少(P =.04)。全髋关节置换术患者在第 7 天的伤口引流明显更高(P =.04),但在其他时间间隔内没有持续差异。与常规敷料相比,体重指数(BMI)>35kg/m2 的接受 iNPWT 装置治疗的全膝关节置换术患者并发症更少(1.3%比 21.6%,P<.01),敷料相关问题更少(1.3%比 10.8%,P=.02)。iNPWT 和常规敷料组之间的晚期浅表或深部感染率无显著差异(4.0%比 3.4%,P=.8)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持使用 iNPWT 装置改善软组织愈合反应。虽然全髋关节置换术后的术后伤口引流可能会限制其价值,但切口 NPWT 装置可能对 BMI>35kg/m2 的择期全膝关节置换术患者有针对性的益处。在这个高风险患者群体中进行特定的研究可能有助于确定 iNPWT 的价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验