• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术患者淋巴结转移的列线图比较。

Comparison of nomograms predicting lymph node invasion in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

作者信息

Nason G J, O'Connor E M, MacMahon D, Moss B, Considine S W, Cahill A, O'Rourke C, O'Brien F M

机构信息

Department of Urology, Cork University Hospital, Wilton, Cork, Ireland.

Department of Urology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Feb;187(1):33-37. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1626-8. Epub 2017 May 6.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-017-1626-8
PMID:28478609
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the performance of preoperative risk nomograms or detecting lymph node invasion in a cohort of men undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on all men (n = 145) who underwent RP between 2012 and 2015. Preoperative data was inputted to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre (MSKCC), Partin 2011 and Briganti nomograms and the University of California San Francisco- Centre of the Prostate Risk Assessment tool (UCSF-CAPRA). The risk of lymph node involvement (LNI) was calculated and compared to final histology.

RESULTS

One hundred three (71%) men underwent a lymph node dissection at RP. Ten (9.7%) demonstrated LNI. The median nodal yield was 15 nodes, with no difference between those with LNI and those without (19.5 vs 14.5, p = 0.22).No patient classified as low risk on the UCSF-CAPRA score had evidence of LNI. In patients with LNI, no patient breached the 2% threshold for lymph node dissection (LND) on the MSKCC nomogram; four patients breached the 5% threshold on the Partin tables while three patients breached the 2.5% threshold for the Briganti nomogram.

CONCLUSION

Nomograms produce useful information regarding risk of disease; however, they often have not been validated on different populations. Risk predictions need to be considered carefully and treatment decisions were made on a patient specific basis.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较术前风险列线图在一组接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)的男性患者中检测淋巴结侵犯的性能。

方法

对2012年至2015年间接受RP的所有男性患者(n = 145)进行回顾性分析。将术前数据输入纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)、2011年帕廷列线图和布里甘蒂列线图以及加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校前列腺风险评估工具(UCSF-CAPRA)。计算淋巴结受累(LNI)的风险并与最终组织学结果进行比较。

结果

103名(71%)男性在RP时接受了淋巴结清扫。10名(9.7%)显示有LNI。淋巴结切除中位数为15个,有LNI和无LNI的患者之间无差异(19.5对14.5,p = 0.22)。UCSF-CAPRA评分分类为低风险的患者均无LNI证据。在有LNI的患者中,没有患者突破MSKCC列线图上2%的淋巴结清扫(LND)阈值;4名患者突破了帕廷表上5%的阈值,而3名患者突破了布里甘蒂列线图上2.5%的阈值。

结论

列线图可提供有关疾病风险的有用信息;然而,它们通常尚未在不同人群中得到验证。需要仔细考虑风险预测,并根据患者的具体情况做出治疗决策。

相似文献

1
Comparison of nomograms predicting lymph node invasion in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术患者淋巴结转移的列线图比较。
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Feb;187(1):33-37. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1626-8. Epub 2017 May 6.
2
First North American validation and head-to-head comparison of four preoperative nomograms for prediction of lymph node invasion before radical prostatectomy.四种术前列腺癌根治术前预测淋巴结侵犯的列线图在北美的首次验证和头对头比较。
BJU Int. 2018 Apr;121(4):592-599. doi: 10.1111/bju.14074. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
A Novel Nomogram to Identify Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Systematic Biopsies.一种新的列线图模型,用于识别经 MRI 靶向和系统活检诊断为局限性前列腺癌患者中需要行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的候选者。
Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):506-514. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
4
Identification of the Optimal Candidates for Nodal Staging with Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Among Prostate Cancer Patients Who Underwent Preoperative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography. External Validation of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Briganti Nomograms and Development of a Novel Tool.基于术前前列腺特异膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描识别行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者最佳淋巴结分期候选者:纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心和布里甘蒂列线图的外部验证及新型工具的开发。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2023 Dec;6(6):543-552. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.003. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
5
Head to head comparison of nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.列线图预测接受广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯概率的头对头比较。
Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.036.
6
Benefit and harm of lymphadenectomy in intermediate risk prostate cancer: comparison of five nomograms.中危前列腺癌淋巴结清扫术的获益与危害:五种列线图比较。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 18;23(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01362-y.
7
Validation and head-to-head comparison of three nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended and/or sentinel lymph node dissection.验证和头对头比较三种列线图预测接受扩大和/或前哨淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯概率。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Dec;44(13):2213-2226. doi: 10.1007/s00259-017-3788-z. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
8
External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯的更新列线图的外部验证
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):277-82. doi: 10.1159/000343993. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
9
External Validation of the 2019 Briganti Nomogram for the Identification of Prostate Cancer Patients Who Should Be Considered for an Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection.2019 年 Briganti 列线图对前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的评估作用的外部验证。
Eur Urol. 2020 Aug;78(2):138-142. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.03.023. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
10
Validation of nomograms predicting lymph node involvement in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结受累情况的列线图的验证
Urol Int. 2014;92(3):300-5. doi: 10.1159/000354323. Epub 2014 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
External Validation of Briganti and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre Nomograms for Predicting Lymph Node Invasion in the Indian Cohort of Patients with Prostate Cancer.用于预测印度前列腺癌患者队列中淋巴结侵犯的布里甘蒂和纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心列线图的外部验证
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):450-455. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01732-w. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
2
Comparison of Four Validated Nomograms (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Briganti 2012, 2017, and 2019) Predicting Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Clinical Experience and Review of the Literature.四种验证后的列线图(纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心、布里甘蒂2012年、2017年和2019年)预测高危前列腺癌患者行根治性前列腺切除术及扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术后淋巴结侵犯情况的比较:临床经验及文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 9;15(6):1683. doi: 10.3390/cancers15061683.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.该适应症符合欧洲泌尿外科协会指南推荐,在高容量中心进行盆腔淋巴结清扫:开放性与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的差异。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Nov;41(11):1547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.05.008. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
2
Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时盆腔淋巴结清扫的适应证和范围:来自五家欧洲机构的分析。
Eur Urol. 2014 Oct;66(4):635-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.12.059. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
3
EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.
EAU 前列腺癌指南。第 1 部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗——2013 年更新。
Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):124-37. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046. Epub 2013 Oct 6.
4
Sentinel lymph node dissection in more than 1200 prostate cancer cases: rate and prediction of lymph node involvement depending on preoperative tumor characteristics.1200多例前列腺癌患者的前哨淋巴结清扫术:根据术前肿瘤特征分析淋巴结受累率及预测情况
Int J Urol. 2014 Jan;21(1):58-63. doi: 10.1111/iju.12184. Epub 2013 May 9.
5
Head to head comparison of nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.列线图预测接受广泛盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯概率的头对头比较。
Urology. 2012 Mar;79(3):546-51. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.036.
6
Head-to-head comparison of three commonly used preoperative tools for prediction of lymph node invasion at radical prostatectomy.三种常用于预测根治性前列腺切除术时淋巴结侵犯的术前工具的头对头比较。
Urology. 2011 Dec;78(6):1363-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1423.
7
Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores.更新的列线图预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者的淋巴结侵犯:阳性核心百分比的重要性。
Eur Urol. 2012 Mar;61(3):480-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
8
A critical assessment of the value of lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: A population-based study.根治性前列腺切除术中淋巴结清扫价值的批判性评估:一项基于人群的研究。
Prostate. 2011 Oct 1;71(14):1587-94. doi: 10.1002/pros.21376. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
9
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
10
Combined ultrasmall superparamagnetic particles of iron oxide-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reliably detect pelvic lymph node metastases in normal-sized nodes of bladder and prostate cancer patients.联合超小型超顺磁性氧化铁增强磁共振成像和扩散加权磁共振成像能够可靠地检测膀胱癌和前列腺癌患者正常大小淋巴结中的盆腔淋巴结转移。
Eur Urol. 2009 Apr;55(4):761-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.12.034. Epub 2009 Jan 7.