EORTC HQ, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium.
EORTC HQ, Brussels, Belgium.
Radiother Oncol. 2017 Jun;123(3):424-430. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2017.04.019. Epub 2017 May 4.
The phase III EORTC 1219-DAHANCA 29 intergroup trial evaluates the influence of nimorazole in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer when treated with accelerated radiotherapy (RT) in combination with chemotherapy. This article describes the results of the RT Benchmark Case (BC) performed before patient inclusion.
The participating centers were asked to perform a 2-step BC, consisting of (1) a delineation and (2) a planning exercise according to the protocol guidelines. Submissions were prospectively centrally reviewed and feedback was given to the submitting centers. Sørensen-Dice similarity index (DSI) and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD) were retrospectively used to evaluate the agreement between the centers and the expert contours.
Fifty-four submissions (34 delineation and 20 planning exercises) from 19 centers were reviewed. Nine (47%) centers needed to perform the delineation step twice and three (16%) centers 3 times before receiving an approval. An increase in DSI-value and a decrease in HD, in particular for the prophylactic Clinical Target Volume (pCTV), could be found for the resubmitted cases. No unacceptable variations could be found for the planning exercise.
These BC-results highlight the need for effective and prospective RTQA in clinical trials. Even with clearly defined protocol guidelines, delineation and not planning remain the main reason for unacceptable protocol variations. The introduction of more objective quantitative analysis methods, such as the HD and DSI, in future trials might strengthen the evaluation by experts.
EORTC 1219-DAHANCA 29 三期临床试验评估了尼莫唑胺在接受加速放疗(RT)联合化疗的局部晚期头颈部癌症患者中的作用。本文介绍了在患者入组前进行的 RT 基准病例(BC)的结果。
要求参与中心进行两步 BC,包括(1)根据协议指南进行勾画,(2)进行计划。提交的内容进行前瞻性的集中审查,并向提交中心提供反馈。采用 Sørensen-Dice 相似性指数(DSI)和第 95 百分位 Hausdorff 距离(HD)来评估中心与专家轮廓之间的一致性。
对来自 19 个中心的 54 份(34 份勾画和 20 份计划)进行了审查。有 9 个(47%)中心需要进行两次勾画,有 3 个(16%)中心需要进行 3 次勾画,才能得到批准。重新提交的病例的 DSI 值增加,HD 值特别是预防性临床靶区(pCTV)的 HD 值降低。对于计划练习,没有发现不可接受的变化。
这些 BC 结果突出了在临床试验中进行有效和前瞻性 RTQA 的必要性。即使有明确界定的方案指南,勾画和非计划仍然是导致不可接受的方案变化的主要原因。在未来的试验中引入更多客观的定量分析方法,如 HD 和 DSI,可能会加强专家的评估。