Lenis Andrew T, Donin Nicholas M, Johnson David C, Faiena Izak, Salmasi Amirali, Drakaki Alexandra, Belldegrun Arie, Pantuck Allan, Chamie Karim
Institute of Urologic Oncology, Department of Urology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
J Urol. 2018 Jan;199(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.092. Epub 2017 May 4.
We reviewed the literature on adjuvant therapies for patients with high risk localized kidney cancer following surgical resection. In this analysis we merge 2 recently published prospective trials with conflicting results within the context of their respective designs. In addition, we spotlight upcoming trials that use novel immunotherapy based checkpoint inhibitors and have the potential to establish a new standard of care.
We searched PubMed for English language articles published through January 2017 using the keywords "renal cell carcinoma," "kidney cancer," "immunotherapy," "targeted therapy" and "adjuvant therapy." ClinicalTrials.gov was queried for ongoing studies. Relevant data recently presented at major urology and medical oncology meetings are also included.
Adjuvant therapies for high risk localized kidney cancer can be grouped into the categories of 1) traditional immunotherapy, 2) inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor and mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) pathways, 3) vaccines and antibody dependent cytotoxic agents, and 4) immune checkpoint inhibitors. Several trials of traditional immunotherapy, such as interferon-α and high dose interleukin-2, failed to demonstrate benefit as adjuvant treatment and were associated with significant adverse events. Vascular endothelial growth factor and mTOR inhibitors have less severe toxicity in metastatic disease and, therefore, are natural considerations for adjuvant trials. However, current data are conflicting. The ASSURE (Sunitinib Malate or Sorafenib Tosylate in Treating Patients with Kidney Cancer that was Removed by Surgery, NCT00326898) trial found no recurrence-free survival benefit of sorafenib or sunitinib over placebo, while S-TRAC (Clinical Trial Comparing Efficacy and Safety of Sunitinib versus Placebo for the Treatment of Patients at High Risk of Recurrent Renal Cell Cancer, NCT00375674) revealed that 1 year of sunitinib improved recurrence-free survival by 1.2 years. Vaccine based treatments and antibody dependent cytotoxic agents have had mixed results. New trials evaluating immune checkpoint inhibitors are planned, given the impressive efficacy and tolerability as second line agents in metastatic disease. Future adjuvant trials are likely to be guided by molecular signatures to treat patients most likely to benefit.
Based on the available data, there appears to be no role for traditional immunotherapy as adjuvant treatment in patients with high risk localized kidney cancer following surgical resection. S-TRAC provides evidence that 1 year of adjuvant sunitinib in patients with higher risk locoregional disease increases the median time to recurrence. However, the data on overall survival are immature and adverse effects are common. Results from trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors are highly anticipated.
我们回顾了关于手术切除后高危局限性肾癌患者辅助治疗的文献。在本分析中,我们将两项近期发表的结果相互矛盾的前瞻性试验,在其各自设计的背景下进行了合并。此外,我们重点介绍了即将开展的使用基于新型免疫疗法的检查点抑制剂的试验,这些试验有可能确立新的治疗标准。
我们在PubMed上搜索了截至2017年1月发表的英文文章,使用的关键词为“肾细胞癌”“肾癌”“免疫疗法”“靶向治疗”和“辅助治疗”。在ClinicalTrials.gov上查询了正在进行的研究。还纳入了近期在主要泌尿外科和医学肿瘤学会议上公布的相关数据。
高危局限性肾癌的辅助治疗可分为以下几类:1)传统免疫疗法;2)血管内皮生长因子和mTOR(雷帕霉素哺乳动物靶点)通路抑制剂;3)疫苗和抗体依赖性细胞毒性药物;4)免疫检查点抑制剂。几项传统免疫疗法试验,如干扰素-α和高剂量白细胞介素-2,未能证明作为辅助治疗有获益,且与显著的不良事件相关。血管内皮生长因子和mTOR抑制剂在转移性疾病中的毒性较小,因此是辅助试验的自然选择。然而,目前的数据相互矛盾。ASSURE(苹果酸舒尼替尼或甲苯磺酸索拉非尼治疗手术切除肾癌患者,NCT00326898)试验发现,索拉非尼或舒尼替尼在无复发生存方面并不优于安慰剂,而S-TRAC(舒尼替尼与安慰剂治疗复发性肾细胞癌高危患者的疗效和安全性比较临床试验,NCT00375674)显示,1年的舒尼替尼治疗使无复发生存期延长了1.2年。基于疫苗的治疗和抗体依赖性细胞毒性药物的结果不一。鉴于免疫检查点抑制剂作为转移性疾病二线药物的显著疗效和耐受性,计划开展新的评估试验。未来的辅助试验可能会以分子特征为指导,以治疗最可能获益的患者。
根据现有数据,传统免疫疗法在手术切除后高危局限性肾癌患者的辅助治疗中似乎没有作用。S-TRAC提供了证据表明高危局部疾病患者接受1年的辅助舒尼替尼治疗可增加复发的中位时间。然而,总生存数据尚不成熟,且不良反应常见。人们高度期待免疫检查点抑制剂试验的结果。