Ehrler Frederic, Blondon Katherine, Baillon-Bigotte Dominique, Lovis Christian
Division of Medical Information Science, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Medical Directorate, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;237:73-78.
Although mobile devices become more and more common in clinicians' hands, transforming them into an institutional tool to access electronic health record information at the patient's bedside still raises many questions. One of these questions is the provenance of mobile devices when these are deployed at an institutional level. Some advocate the use of personal devices, known as BYOD, for its lower cost, others favor the use of institutional devices which allow a standardization of the development, deployment and support processes. The financial disadvantage of institutional devices could be reduced by sharing devices between several care-providers. The problem with this solution is the authentication management. Indeed, smartphones are defined for individual use and do not efficiently manage multiple identities on a single device. In this article we present the outcome of a Delphi study aiming at identifying an authentication strategy that combines security and acceptable usability in order to share a pool of devices in a medical ward.
尽管移动设备在临床医生手中越来越常见，但将其转变为在患者床边访问电子健康记录信息的机构工具仍引发了许多问题。其中一个问题是这些移动设备在机构层面部署时的来源。一些人主张使用个人设备，即自带设备（BYOD），因其成本较低，另一些人则倾向于使用机构设备，这样可以使开发、部署和支持流程标准化。通过在多个护理提供者之间共享设备，可以降低机构设备的财务劣势。这种解决方案的问题在于认证管理。事实上，智能手机是为个人使用而设计的，无法在单个设备上有效地管理多个身份。在本文中，我们展示了一项德尔菲研究的结果，该研究旨在确定一种结合安全性和可接受的可用性的认证策略，以便在医疗病房中共享一批设备。
