• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

客户对心理健康参与网络的看法:对电子个人健康记录的定性分析

Client perceptions of the mental health engagement network: a qualitative analysis of an electronic personal health record.

作者信息

Forchuk Cheryl, Reiss Jeffrey P, O'Regan Tony, Ethridge Paige, Donelle Lorie, Rudnick Abraham

机构信息

Lawson Health Research Institute, 750 Baseline Road East, London, ON, Canada.

Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, ON, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:250. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0614-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-015-0614-7
PMID:26467210
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4606496/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Information technologies such as websites, mobile phone applications, and virtual reality programs have been shown to deliver innovative and effective treatments for mental illness. Much of the research studying electronic mental health interventions focuses on symptom reduction; however, to facilitate the implementation of electronic interventions in usual mental health care, it is also important to investigate the perceptions of clients who will be using the technologies. To this end, a qualitative analysis of focus group discussions regarding the Mental Health Engagement Network, a web-based personal health record and smartphone intervention, is presented here.

METHODS

Individuals living in the community with a mood or psychotic disorder (n = 394) were provided with a smartphone and access to an electronic personal health record, the Lawson SMART Record, for 12 to 18 months to manage their mental health. This study employed a delayed-implementation design and obtained both quantitative and qualitative data through individual interviews and focus group sessions. Participants had the opportunity to participate in voluntary focus group sessions at three points throughout the study to discuss their perceptions of the technologies. Qualitative data from 95 focus group participants were analysed using a thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Four overarching themes emerged from focus group discussions: 1) Versatile functionality of the Lawson SMART Record and smartphone facilitated use; 2) Aspects of the technologies as barriers to use; 3) Use of the Mental health Engagement Network technologies resulted in perceived positive outcomes; 4) Future enhancement of the Lawson SMART Record and intervention is recommended.

DISCUSSION

These qualitative data provide a valuable contribution to the understanding of how smarttechnologies can be integrated into usual mental health care. Smartphones are extremely portable andcommonplace in society. Therefore, clients can use these devices to manage and track mental health issuesin any place at almost any time without feeling stigmatized.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessing clients' perspectives regarding the use of smart technologies in mental health care provides an invaluable addition to the current literature. Qualitative findings support the feasibility of implementing a smartphone and electronic personal health record intervention with individuals who are living in the community and experiencing a mental illness, and provide considerations for future development and implementation.

摘要

背景

诸如网站、手机应用程序和虚拟现实程序等信息技术已被证明能为精神疾病提供创新且有效的治疗方法。许多研究电子心理健康干预措施的研究都聚焦于症状减轻;然而,为了促进电子干预措施在常规心理健康护理中的实施,调查将使用这些技术的客户的看法也很重要。为此,本文呈现了对关于心理健康参与网络(一个基于网络的个人健康记录和智能手机干预措施)的焦点小组讨论的定性分析。

方法

为居住在社区中患有情绪或精神障碍的个体(n = 394)提供一部智能手机,并让他们使用电子个人健康记录“劳森智能记录”12至18个月来管理他们的心理健康。本研究采用延迟实施设计,并通过个人访谈和焦点小组会议获取定量和定性数据。参与者有机会在研究过程中的三个时间点参加自愿焦点小组会议,以讨论他们对这些技术的看法。对95名焦点小组参与者的定性数据进行了主题分析。

结果

焦点小组讨论中出现了四个总体主题:1)劳森智能记录和智能手机的多功能性促进了使用;2)技术方面成为使用的障碍;3)使用心理健康参与网络技术带来了积极的结果;4)建议对劳森智能记录和干预措施进行未来改进。

讨论

这些定性数据为理解智能技术如何融入常规心理健康护理做出了宝贵贡献。智能手机极其便携且在社会中很常见。因此,客户可以使用这些设备在几乎任何时间、任何地点管理和跟踪心理健康问题,而不会感到有污名化。

结论

评估客户对在心理健康护理中使用智能技术的看法为当前文献增添了宝贵内容。定性研究结果支持了对社区中患有精神疾病的个体实施智能手机和电子个人健康记录干预措施的可行性,并为未来的发展和实施提供了考虑因素。

相似文献

1
Client perceptions of the mental health engagement network: a qualitative analysis of an electronic personal health record.客户对心理健康参与网络的看法:对电子个人健康记录的定性分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Oct 14;15:250. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0614-7.
2
Client Perceptions of the Mental Health Engagement Network: A Secondary Analysis of an Intervention Using Smartphones and Desktop Devices for Individuals Experiencing Mood or Psychotic Disorders in Canada.客户端对心理健康参与网络的认知:利用智能手机和台式设备对加拿大情绪或精神病患者进行干预的二次分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 Jan 21;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/mental.3926. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.
3
Is India ready for mental health apps (MHApps)? A quantitative-qualitative exploration of caregivers' perspective on smartphone-based solutions for managing severe mental illnesses in low resource settings.印度是否准备好接受心理健康应用程序(MHApps)?在资源匮乏环境下,基于智能手机的解决方案来管理严重精神疾病,从照顾者的角度对这一问题进行定量-定性探索。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203353. eCollection 2018.
4
Electronic personal health records for people with severe mental illness; a feasibility study.重度精神疾病患者的电子个人健康记录;一项可行性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 6;15:192. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0558-y.
5
Life with FOCUS: A qualitative evaluation of the impact of a smartphone intervention on people with serious mental illness.聚焦生活:智能手机干预对严重精神疾病患者影响的定性评估
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Jun;42(2):182-189. doi: 10.1037/prj0000337. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
6
Making it work for me: beliefs about making a personal health record relevant and useable.使其对我有用:关于使个人健康记录具有相关性和可用性的信念。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 14;18(1):445. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3254-z.
7
Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study.患者对使用数字系统进行动态同意和研究反馈来共享匿名个人健康数据的看法:一项定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Apr 15;18(4):e66. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5011.
8
Inter-professional delirium education and care: a qualitative feasibility study of implementing a delirium Smartphone application.跨专业谵妄教育与护理:一项关于实施谵妄智能手机应用程序的定性可行性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2016 Apr 30;16:50. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0288-1.
9
Perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone application for the treatment of binge eating disorders: Qualitative feedback from a user population and clinicians.关于一款用于治疗暴饮暴食症的智能手机应用程序的可行性和可接受性的认知:来自用户群体和临床医生的定性反馈
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):808-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
10
A qualitative study of how patients with type 2 diabetes use an electronic stand-alone personal health record.一项关于2型糖尿病患者如何使用独立电子个人健康记录的定性研究。
Telemed J E Health. 2015 Apr;21(4):296-300. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2014.0084. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone-Based Self-Monitoring in First Episode Psychosis: Mixed-Methods Study of Barriers and Facilitators to Engagement.首发精神病中基于智能手机的自我监测:参与障碍与促进因素的混合方法研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 26;27:e71989. doi: 10.2196/71989.
2
The gaps and challenges in digital health technology use as perceived by patients: a scoping review and narrative meta-synthesis.患者所感知的数字健康技术使用中的差距与挑战:一项范围综述与叙述性元综合分析
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 27;7:1474956. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1474956. eCollection 2025.
3
Patient-Accessible Electronic Health Records and Information Practices in Mental Health Care Contexts: Scoping Review.精神卫生保健背景下患者可访问的电子健康记录及信息实践:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 7;27:e54973. doi: 10.2196/54973.
4
Barriers and Facilitators of User Engagement With Digital Mental Health Interventions for People With Psychosis or Bipolar Disorder: Systematic Review and Best-Fit Framework Synthesis.精神病或双相情感障碍患者对数字心理健康干预措施的参与障碍与促进因素:系统评价与最佳拟合框架综合分析
JMIR Ment Health. 2025 Jan 20;12:e65246. doi: 10.2196/65246.
5
Data Visualization Preferences in Remote Measurement Technology for Individuals Living With Depression, Epilepsy, and Multiple Sclerosis: Qualitative Study.远程测量技术中个体患有抑郁症、癫痫和多发性硬化症的数据可视化偏好:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 18;26:e43954. doi: 10.2196/43954.
6
A systematic review of users experiences of using digital interventions within psychosis: a thematic synthesis of qualitative research.对精神病患者使用数字干预措施的用户体验的系统评价:定性研究的主题综合分析
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;60(2):275-303. doi: 10.1007/s00127-024-02692-4. Epub 2024 May 27.
7
PERCEPTIONS AND EXPERIENCES OF M-HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES AND SOCIAL MEDIA: A QUALITATIVE STUDY IN PATIENTS WITH SCHIZOPHRENIA.移动健康技术和社交媒体的认知与体验:一项针对精神分裂症患者的定性研究
Health Psychol Res. 2023 Dec 9;11:89721. doi: 10.52965/001c.89721. eCollection 2023.
8
The Effects of Online Access to General Practice Medical Records Perceived by Patients: Longitudinal Survey Study.患者对在线获取全科医疗记录的看法的影响:纵向调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 2;25:e47659. doi: 10.2196/47659.
9
Patient online access to general practice medical records: A qualitative study on patients' needs and expectations.患者在线获取全科医疗记录:一项关于患者需求和期望的定性研究。
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):166-173. doi: 10.1177/18333583221144666. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
10
Data Visualization for Chronic Neurological and Mental Health Condition Self-management: Systematic Review of User Perspectives.慢性神经和心理健康状况自我管理的数据可视化:用户视角的系统评价
JMIR Ment Health. 2022 Apr 28;9(4):e25249. doi: 10.2196/25249.

本文引用的文献

1
Client Perceptions of the Mental Health Engagement Network: A Secondary Analysis of an Intervention Using Smartphones and Desktop Devices for Individuals Experiencing Mood or Psychotic Disorders in Canada.客户端对心理健康参与网络的认知:利用智能手机和台式设备对加拿大情绪或精神病患者进行干预的二次分析。
JMIR Ment Health. 2015 Jan 21;2(1):e1. doi: 10.2196/mental.3926. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.
2
Collaborative development of an electronic Personal Health Record for people with severe and enduring mental health problems.为患有严重和持续性心理健康问题的人群协同开发电子个人健康记录。
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Nov 18;14:305. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0305-9.
3
Cognitive behavior therapy versus interpersonal psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder delivered via smartphone and computer: a randomized controlled trial.智能手机和计算机介导的认知行为疗法与人际心理治疗治疗社交焦虑障碍的随机对照试验。
J Anxiety Disord. 2014 May;28(4):410-7. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
4
Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia.智能手机干预治疗精神分裂症的可行性、可接受性及初步疗效
Schizophr Bull. 2014 Nov;40(6):1244-53. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu033. Epub 2014 Mar 8.
5
Randomized trial of an electronic personal health record for patients with serious mental illnesses.电子个人健康记录在严重精神疾病患者中的随机试验。
Am J Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;171(3):360-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.13070913.
6
Critical design elements of e-health applications for users with severe mental illness: singular focus, simple architecture, prominent contents, explicit navigation, and inclusive hyperlinks.针对重度精神疾病患者的电子健康应用程序的关键设计要素:单一重点、简单架构、突出内容、明确导航和包容性超链接。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 Mar;41(2):440-8. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbt194. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
7
Factors affecting usage of a personal health record (PHR) to manage health.影响个人健康记录(PHR)使用以管理健康的因素。
Psychol Aging. 2013 Dec;28(4):1124-39. doi: 10.1037/a0033911.
8
Smartphones for smarter delivery of mental health programs: a systematic review.用于更智能地提供心理健康项目的智能手机:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Nov 15;15(11):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2791.
9
Development and usability testing of FOCUS: a smartphone system for self-management of schizophrenia.开发并测试 FOCUS:一款用于精神分裂症自我管理的智能手机系统。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2013 Dec;36(4):289-296. doi: 10.1037/prj0000019. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
10
A comparison of two delivery modalities of a mobile phone-based assessment for serious mental illness: native smartphone application vs text-messaging only implementations.基于手机的严重精神疾病评估的两种交付方式比较:原生智能手机应用程序与仅使用短信的实施方式。
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Apr 5;15(4):e60. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2328.