Suppr超能文献

自愿性眼球跳动在大量强迫症患者和未受影响的一级亲属中的表现。

Volitional saccade performance in a large sample of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and unaffected first-degree relatives.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.

German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2017 Sep;54(9):1284-1294. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12884. Epub 2017 May 8.

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) as well as their unaffected first-degree relatives show deficits in the volitional control of saccades, suggesting that volitional saccade performance may constitute an endophenotype of OCD. Here, we aimed to replicate and extend these findings in a large, independent sample. One hundred and fifteen patients with OCD, 103 healthy comparison subjects without a family history of OCD, and 31 unaffected first-degree relatives of OCD patients were examined using structured clinical interviews and performed a volitional saccade task as well as a prosaccade task. In contrast to previous reports, neither patients nor relatives showed impairments in the performance of volitional saccades compared to healthy controls. Notably, medicated patients did not differ from nonmedicated patients, and there was no effect of depressive comorbidity. Additional analyses investigating correlations between saccade performance and OCD symptom dimensions yielded no significant associations. In conclusion, the present results do not support the notion that volitional saccade execution constitutes an endophenotype of OCD. Possible explanations for inconsistencies with previous studies are discussed.

摘要

最近的证据表明,强迫症(OCD)患者及其未受影响的一级亲属在眼球运动的意志控制方面存在缺陷,这表明意志性眼球运动表现可能是 OCD 的一个内表型。在这里,我们旨在在一个大型独立样本中复制和扩展这些发现。使用结构化临床访谈,对 115 名强迫症患者、103 名无 OCD 家族史的健康对照组和 31 名强迫症患者的未受影响的一级亲属进行了检查,并进行了意志性眼球运动任务和前瞻性眼球运动任务。与之前的报告相反,与健康对照组相比,患者和亲属在执行意志性眼球运动方面均未表现出损伤。值得注意的是,用药患者与未用药患者没有差异,且抑郁共病没有影响。对探索眼球运动表现与 OCD 症状维度之间相关性的额外分析未发现显著关联。总之,目前的结果不支持意志性眼球运动执行是 OCD 的内表型的观点。讨论了与先前研究不一致的可能解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验