Suppr超能文献

比较多标准决策分析与综合评估以支持长期供水规划。

Comparing multi-criteria decision analysis and integrated assessment to support long-term water supply planning.

作者信息

Scholten Lisa, Maurer Max, Lienert Judit

机构信息

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 8;12(5):e0176663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176663. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

We compare the use of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA)-or more precisely, models used in multi-attribute value theory (MAVT)-to integrated assessment (IA) models for supporting long-term water supply planning in a small town case study in Switzerland. They are used to evaluate thirteen system scale water supply alternatives in four future scenarios regarding forty-four objectives, covering technical, social, environmental, and economic aspects. The alternatives encompass both conventional and unconventional solutions and differ regarding technical, spatial and organizational characteristics. This paper focuses on the impact assessment and final evaluation step of the structured MCDA decision support process. We analyze the performance of the alternatives for ten stakeholders. We demonstrate the implications of model assumptions by comparing two IA and three MAVT evaluation model layouts of different complexity. For this comparison, we focus on the validity (ranking stability), desirability (value), and distinguishability (value range) of the alternatives given the five model layouts. These layouts exclude or include stakeholder preferences and uncertainties. Even though all five led us to identify the same best alternatives, they did not produce identical rankings. We found that the MAVT-type models provide higher distinguishability and a more robust basis for discussion than the IA-type models. The needed complexity of the model, however, should be determined based on the intended use of the model within the decision support process. The best-performing alternatives had consistently strong performance for all stakeholders and future scenarios, whereas the current water supply system was outperformed in all evaluation layouts. The best-performing alternatives comprise proactive pipe rehabilitation, adapted firefighting provisions, and decentralized water storage and/or treatment. We present recommendations for possible ways of improving water supply planning in the case study and beyond.

摘要

我们将多标准决策分析(MCDA)——或者更准确地说,多属性价值理论(MAVT)中使用的模型——与综合评估(IA)模型进行比较,以支持瑞士一个小镇案例研究中的长期供水规划。它们被用于评估四种未来情景下针对44个目标的13种系统规模的供水方案,涵盖技术、社会、环境和经济方面。这些方案包括传统和非传统解决方案,在技术、空间和组织特征方面存在差异。本文重点关注结构化MCDA决策支持过程的影响评估和最终评估步骤。我们分析了十种利益相关者对这些方案的表现。通过比较两种不同复杂程度的IA评估模型布局和三种MAVT评估模型布局,我们展示了模型假设的影响。对于此次比较,我们关注在五种模型布局下各方案的有效性(排名稳定性)、合意性(价值)和可区分性(价值范围)。这些布局排除或纳入了利益相关者的偏好和不确定性。尽管所有五种布局都使我们确定了相同的最佳方案,但它们产生的排名并不相同。我们发现,与IA型模型相比,MAVT型模型具有更高的可区分性和更坚实有力的讨论基础。然而,模型所需的复杂程度应根据其在决策支持过程中的预期用途来确定。表现最佳的方案在所有利益相关者和未来情景下始终表现强劲,而当前的供水系统在所有评估布局中都表现较差。表现最佳的方案包括积极的管道修复、适配的消防措施以及分散式蓄水和/或处理。我们针对案例研究及其他地区改进供水规划的可能方式提出了建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5038/5421771/e75212be43a5/pone.0176663.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验