Barthassat Emilienne, Afifi Faik, Konala Praveen, Rasch Helmut, Hirschmann Michael T
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Baselland Bruderholz, Liestal, Laufen, Switzerland.
Basel University, Basel, Switzerland.
BMC Med Imaging. 2017 May 8;17(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12880-017-0204-x.
It was the primary purpose of our study to evaluate the inter- and intra-observer reliability of a standardized SPECT/CT algorithm for evaluating patients with painful primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The secondary purpose was a comparison of semi-quantitative and 3D volumetric quantification method for assessment of bone tracer uptake (BTU) in those patients.
A novel SPECT/CT localization scheme consisting of 14 femoral and 4 acetabular regions on standardized axial and coronal slices was introduced and evaluated in terms of inter- and intra-observer reliability in 37 consecutive patients with hip pain after THA. BTU for each anatomical region was assessed semi-quantitatively using a color-coded Likert type scale (0-10) and volumetrically quantified using a validated software. Two observers interpreted the SPECT/CT findings in all patients two times with six weeks interval between interpretations in random order. Semi-quantitative and quantitative measurements were compared in terms of reliability. In addition, the values were correlated using Pearson`s correlation. A factorial cluster analysis of BTU was performed to identify clinically relevant regions, which should be grouped and analysed together.
The localization scheme showed high inter- and intra-observer reliabilities for all femoral and acetabular regions independent of the measurement method used (semiquantitative versus 3D volumetric quantitative measurements). A high to moderate correlation between both measurement methods was shown for the distal femur, the proximal femur and the acetabular cup. The factorial cluster analysis showed that the anatomical regions might be summarized into three distinct anatomical regions. These were the proximal femur, the distal femur and the acetabular cup region.
The SPECT/CT algorithm for assessment of patients with pain after THA is highly reliable independent from the measurement method used. Three clinically relevant anatomical regions (proximal femoral, distal femoral, acetabular) were identified.
本研究的主要目的是评估一种标准化的SPECT/CT算法在评估疼痛性初次全髋关节置换术(THA)患者时的观察者间和观察者内可靠性。次要目的是比较半定量和三维体积定量方法在评估这些患者骨显像剂摄取(BTU)方面的差异。
引入了一种新颖的SPECT/CT定位方案,该方案在标准化的轴位和冠状位切片上包括14个股骨区域和4个髋臼区域,并在37例THA后出现髋关节疼痛的连续患者中,就观察者间和观察者内可靠性进行了评估。使用颜色编码的李克特量表(0-10)对每个解剖区域的BTU进行半定量评估,并使用经过验证的软件进行体积定量。两名观察者对所有患者的SPECT/CT结果进行两次解读,两次解读之间间隔六周,解读顺序随机。比较了半定量和定量测量的可靠性。此外,使用皮尔逊相关性对数值进行关联。对BTU进行因子聚类分析,以识别应分组并一起分析的临床相关区域。
无论使用何种测量方法(半定量与三维体积定量测量),该定位方案在所有股骨和髋臼区域均显示出高观察者间和观察者内可靠性。对于股骨远端、股骨近端和髋臼杯,两种测量方法之间显示出高到中度的相关性。因子聚类分析表明,解剖区域可归纳为三个不同的解剖区域。这些区域是股骨近端、股骨远端和髋臼杯区域。
用于评估THA后疼痛患者的SPECT/CT算法高度可靠,与所使用的测量方法无关。确定了三个临床相关的解剖区域(股骨近端、股骨远端、髋臼)。