Chan Jessica Yin Man, Scourboutakos Mary J, L'Abbé Mary R
Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Toronto, Fitzgerald Building, 150 College St., Rm 315, Toronto, ON, M1S 3E2, Canada.
Prenetics Ltd., Prenetics Ltd. 7/F, Prosperity Millennia Plaza, 663 King's Rd, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong, China.
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 8;17(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4362-0.
Serving sizes on the Nutrition Facts table (NFt) on Canadian packaged foods have traditionally been unregulated and non-standardized. The federal government recently passed legislation to regulate the serving sizes listed on the NFt. The objective of this study was to compare the serving sizes on food product NFts to the recommendations in the 2003 Nutrition Labelling regulation (Schedule M) reference amounts, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) ranges, and Canada's Food Guide recommendations. An additional objective was to determine if food and beverage products that report smaller serving sizes have a higher calorie density, compared to similar products with a larger serving size.
Data for 10,487 products were retrieved from the 2010 Food Label Information Program (FLIP) database and categorized according to Schedule M categories. Correlations between calorie density and manufacturer stated serving size were tested and the proportion of products meeting recommendations were tabulated.
35% of products had serving sizes on the NFt that were smaller than the Schedule M reference amount and 23% exceeded the reference amount. 86% of products fell within the CFIA's recommended serving size ranges; however, 70% were within the lower-half of the range. Several bread and juice categories exceeded CFG's recommendations, while several dairy product categories were smaller than the recommendations. Of the 50 Schedule M sub-categories analyzed, 31 (62%) exhibited a negative correlation between serving size and calorie density.
While most products fell within the CFIA's recommended serving size ranges, there was a tendency for products with a higher calorie density to list smaller serving sizes.
加拿大包装食品营养成分表(NFt)上的食用份量传统上一直未受监管且不标准。联邦政府最近通过了立法,对营养成分表上列出的食用份量进行规范。本研究的目的是将食品营养成分表上的食用份量与2003年《营养标签条例》(附表M)参考量、加拿大食品检验局(CFIA)范围以及《加拿大食物指南》的建议进行比较。另一个目的是确定与食用份量较大的类似产品相比,报告较小食用份量的食品和饮料产品是否具有更高的卡路里密度。
从2010年食品标签信息计划(FLIP)数据库中检索了10487种产品的数据,并根据附表M类别进行分类。测试了卡路里密度与制造商声明的食用份量之间的相关性,并列出了符合建议的产品比例。
35%的产品在营养成分表上的食用份量小于附表M参考量,23%超过了参考量。86%的产品落在加拿大食品检验局建议的食用份量范围内;然而,70%在范围的下半部分。几个面包和果汁类别超过了加拿大食物指南的建议,而几个乳制品类别则小于建议值。在分析的50个附表M子类别中,31个(62%)的食用份量与卡路里密度呈负相关。
虽然大多数产品落在加拿大食品检验局建议的食用份量范围内,但卡路里密度较高的产品往往列出较小的食用份量。