• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院内紧急情况的危机检查表:多机构多学科学习协作确定模板的专家共识、模拟测试及建议

Crisis checklists for in-hospital emergencies: expert consensus, simulation testing and recommendations for a template determined by a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary learning collaborative.

作者信息

Subbe Christian P, Kellett John, Barach Paul, Chaloner Catriona, Cleaver Hayley, Cooksley Tim, Korsten Erik, Croke Eilish, Davis Elinor, De Bie Ashley Jr, Durham Lesley, Hancock Chris, Hartin Jilian, Savijn Tracy, Welch John

机构信息

Ysbyty Gwynedd & Bangor University, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, LL57 2PW, UK.

Nenagh Hospital, Nenagh, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 8;17(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2288-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-017-2288-y
PMID:28482890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5422971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

'Failure to rescue' of hospitalized patients with deteriorating physiology on general wards is caused by a complex array of organisational, technical and cultural failures including a lack of standardized team and individual expected responses and actions. The aim of this study using a learning collaborative method was to develop consensus recomendations on the utility and effectiveness of checklists as training and operational tools to assist in improving the skills of general ward staff on the effective rescue of patients with abnormal physiology.

METHODS

A scoping study of the literature was followed by a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary international learning collaborative. We sought to achieve a consensus on procedures and clinical simulation technology to determine the requirements, develop and test a safe using a checklist template that is rapidly accessible to assist in emergency management of common events for general ward use.

RESULTS

Safety considerations about deteriorating patients were agreed upon and summarized. A consensus was achieved among an international group of experts on currently available checklist formats performing poorly in simulation testing as first responders in general ward clinical crises. The Crisis Checklist Collaborative ratified a consensus template for a general ward checklist that provides a list of issues for first responders to address (i.e. 'Check In'), a list of prompts regarding common omissions (i.e. 'Stop & Think'), and, a list of items required for the safe "handover" of patients that remain on the general ward (i.e. 'Check Out'). Simulation usability assessment of the template demonstrated feasibility for clinical management of deteriorating patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency checklists custom-designed for general ward patients have the potential to guide the treatment speed and reliability of responses for emergency management of patients with abnormal physiology while minimizing the risk of adverse events. Interventional trials are needed.

摘要

背景

普通病房中生理状况恶化的住院患者的“未能挽救”是由一系列复杂的组织、技术和文化失误导致的,包括缺乏标准化的团队及个人预期反应和行动。本研究采用学习协作方法,旨在就清单作为培训和操作工具的效用和有效性达成共识建议,以帮助提高普通病房工作人员有效抢救生理异常患者的技能。

方法

在对文献进行范围研究之后,开展了一项多机构、多学科的国际学习协作。我们力求就程序和临床模拟技术达成共识,以确定要求,使用一份可快速获取的清单模板进行开发和测试,该模板有助于普通病房对常见事件进行应急管理。

结果

就有关病情恶化患者的安全考量达成了一致意见并进行了总结。国际专家小组就普通病房临床危机中作为第一反应者在模拟测试中表现不佳的现有清单格式达成了共识。危机清单协作组织批准了一份普通病房清单的共识模板,该模板提供了供第一反应者处理的问题清单(即“签到”)、关于常见遗漏的提示清单(即“停下来思考”)以及普通病房中留治患者安全“交接”所需的项目清单(即“签出”)。对该模板的模拟可用性评估表明其对病情恶化患者的临床管理具有可行性。

结论

为普通病房患者量身定制的应急清单有可能指导对生理异常患者进行应急管理时的治疗速度和反应可靠性,同时将不良事件风险降至最低。需要进行干预试验。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a545/5422971/0f00bbbcbeba/12913_2017_2288_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a545/5422971/0f00bbbcbeba/12913_2017_2288_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a545/5422971/0f00bbbcbeba/12913_2017_2288_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Crisis checklists for in-hospital emergencies: expert consensus, simulation testing and recommendations for a template determined by a multi-institutional and multi-disciplinary learning collaborative.医院内紧急情况的危机检查表:多机构多学科学习协作确定模板的专家共识、模拟测试及建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 8;17(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2288-y.
2
Testing the effects of checklists on team behaviour during emergencies on general wards: An observational study using high-fidelity simulation.测试检查表对普通病房紧急情况下团队行为的影响:一项使用高仿真模拟的观察性研究。
Resuscitation. 2020 Dec;157:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.031. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
3
Medical crisis checklists in the emergency department: a simulation-based multi-institutional randomised controlled trial.急诊科医疗危机检查表:一项基于模拟的多机构随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Sep;30(9):697-705. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012740. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
4
The impact of web-based and face-to-face simulation on patient deterioration and patient safety: protocol for a multi-site multi-method design.基于网络和面对面模拟对患者病情恶化及患者安全的影响:多地点多方法设计方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 7;16(1):475. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1683-0.
5
Crisis checklists for the operating room: development and pilot testing.手术室危机核对清单的制定与初步测试
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Aug;213(2):212-217.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.031. Epub 2011 Jun 11.
6
Randomized clinical trial of the impact of surgical ward-care checklists on postoperative care in a simulated environment.随机临床试验研究手术病房护理清单对模拟环境下术后护理的影响。
Br J Surg. 2014 Dec;101(13):1666-73. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9654. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
7
Validating Obstetric Emergency Checklists using Simulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.使用模拟验证产科急救清单:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2016 Oct;33(12):1182-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586118. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
8
Institution-Specific Perinatal Emergency Checklists: Multicenter Report on Development, Implementation, and Sustainability.机构特定的围产期应急清单:多中心开发、实施和可持续性报告。
Am J Perinatol. 2024 May;41(S 01):e1099-e1106. doi: 10.1055/a-1990-2499. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
9
The Development and Implementation of Cognitive Aids for Critical Events in Pediatric Anesthesia: The Society for Pediatric Anesthesia Critical Events Checklists.儿科麻醉危急事件认知辅助工具的制定与实施:儿科麻醉协会危急事件核对清单。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Mar;124(3):900-907. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001746.
10
The use of cognitive aids during emergencies in anesthesia: a review of the literature.麻醉紧急情况下使用认知辅助工具:文献回顾。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Nov;117(5):1162-71. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31829c397b.

引用本文的文献

1
A novel blended and interprofessional approach to pediatric emergency training: self-assessment, perception, and perceived long-term effects.一种新颖的混合式跨专业儿科急诊培训方法:自我评估、感知和长期效果感知。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):1389. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06381-3.
2
Impediments to and impact of checklists on performance of emergency interventions in primary care: an simulation-based randomized controlled trial.基层医疗急救干预执行中清单的阻碍和影响:基于模拟的随机对照试验。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2021 Dec;39(4):438-447. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2021.1973250. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
3
Importance of high-performing teams in the cardiovascular intensive care unit.

本文引用的文献

1
The problem with checklists.检查表的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Sep;24(9):545-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004431. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
2
Emergency manual implementation: can brief simulation-based or staff trainings increase familiarity and planned clinical use?应急手册实施:基于简短模拟的培训或员工培训能否提高熟悉程度并促进临床计划使用?
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 May;41(5):212-20. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41028-1.
3
Back to basics: checklists in aviation and healthcare.回归基础:航空和医疗保健领域的清单
高效团队在心血管重症监护病房中的重要性。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Mar;163(3):1096-1104. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.02.098. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
4
Cardiac arrest due to accidental overdose with norepinephrine dissolved in crystalloid.因意外过量使用溶解在晶体液中的去甲肾上腺素导致心搏骤停。
BMJ Case Rep. 2020 Dec 9;13(12):e237643. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-237643.
5
Checklists for Complications During Systemic Cancer Treatment Shared by Patients, Friends, and Health Care Professionals: Prospective Interventional Cohort Study.患者、朋友及医疗保健专业人员分享的系统性癌症治疗期间并发症清单:前瞻性干预队列研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 25;8(9):e19225. doi: 10.2196/19225.
6
Rethinking COVID-19 in children: Lessons learned from pediatric viral and inflammatory cardiovascular diseases.重新审视儿童新冠肺炎:从儿童病毒性和炎症性心血管疾病中汲取的经验教训。
Prog Pediatr Cardiol. 2020 Jun;57:101233. doi: 10.1016/j.ppedcard.2020.101233. Epub 2020 May 22.
7
Comparing the Effects of Paper and Digital Checklists on Team Performance in Time-Critical Work.比较纸质清单和数字清单在时间紧迫工作中对团队绩效的影响。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2019 May;2019. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300777.
8
Rapid response systems.快速反应系统。
Resuscitation. 2018 Jul;128:191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2018.05.013. Epub 2018 May 16.
9
A systematic approach to the unconscious patient.系统地处理无意识患者。
Clin Med (Lond). 2018 Feb;18(1):88-92. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.18-1-88.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):428-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-003957. Epub 2015 May 12.
4
Into the night: factors affecting response to abnormal Early Warning Scores out-of-hours and implications for service improvement.深入夜间:影响非工作时间对异常早期预警评分反应的因素及对服务改进的启示
Acute Med. 2014;13(2):56-60.
5
Introduction of surgical safety checklists in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省引入手术安全检查表。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 13;370(11):1029-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1308261.
6
Improving ATLS performance in simulated pediatric trauma resuscitation using a checklist.使用检查表提高模拟儿科创伤复苏中的 ATLS 表现。
Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):807-13. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000259.
7
Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program.解释密歇根匹配法:一项患者安全计划的民族志研究。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 20;8:70. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-70.
8
High-reliability emergency response teams in the hospital: improving quality and safety using in situ simulation training.医院高可靠性应急反应团队:运用现场模拟培训提高质量和安全。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jun;22(6):507-14. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-000931. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
9
NEWSDIG: The National Early Warning Score Development and Implementation Group.新闻摘要:国家早期预警评分开发与实施小组
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):501-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-501.
10
Simulation-based trial of surgical-crisis checklists.基于模拟的手术危机检查表试验。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 17;368(3):246-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1204720.