Lin Li, Desai Rakhi, Wang Xiaoying, Lo Eng H, Xing Changhong
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, 325035, China.
Neuroprotection Research Laboratory, Departments of Radiology and Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, MGH East 149-2401, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
J Neuroinflammation. 2017 May 8;14(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12974-017-0877-7.
Microglial cultures comprise a critically important model system for investigating inflammatory mechanisms in almost all CNS disorders. Mild trypsinization and shaking are the two most commonly used methods to isolate primary microglia from mixed glial cultures. In this study, we characterized and compared microglia obtained using these two methods.
Primary rat microglia cultures were prepared from cerebral cortices of 1-2-day-old neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats. After achieving confluency at about 14 days in vitro, microglia were isolated from mixed glial cultures via either mild trypsinization or shaking. The purity of microglia was estimated by flow cytometry. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to measure mRNA expression. TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 in cell culture supernatant were measured using ELISA kits. Phagocytic function was assessed using fluorescein-labeled Escherichia coli K-12 BioParticles.
Mild trypsinization generated a higher yield and purity than shaking. Microglia isolated by mild trypsinization appeared to be in a quiescent state with ramified morphology. Microglia isolated by shaking showed a more heterogenous morphology, including cells with rounded shapes suggestive of activation. Compared with shaking, microglia isolated by trypsinization also had lower baseline phenotype markers (iNOS, CD86, CD206, and arginase 1) and lower levels of cytokines (TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1) as well as reduced phagocytic capability. Both methods yielded microglia that were responsive to various stimuli such as IL-4, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or interferon-γ (IFNγ). Although stimulated patterns of gene expression and cytokine release were generally similar, there were also significant differences in terms of absolute response. LPS treatment induced significantly higher levels of TNFα and IL-10 in microglia isolated by mild trypsinization versus shaking. IFNγ induced a lower response in TNFα in microglia obtained by mild trypsinization versus shaking.
Our results suggest that isolating microglia with the shaking method may induce slight activation even at baseline, and this may affect stimulus responses in subsequent experiments. Caution and attention should be warranted when choosing isolation protocols for primary microglia cultures.
小胶质细胞培养是研究几乎所有中枢神经系统疾病炎症机制的至关重要的模型系统。轻度胰蛋白酶消化和振荡是从混合胶质细胞培养物中分离原代小胶质细胞最常用的两种方法。在本研究中,我们对使用这两种方法获得的小胶质细胞进行了表征和比较。
从1-2日龄新生Sprague-Dawley大鼠的大脑皮质制备原代大鼠小胶质细胞培养物。在体外培养约14天达到汇合后,通过轻度胰蛋白酶消化或振荡从混合胶质细胞培养物中分离小胶质细胞。通过流式细胞术估计小胶质细胞的纯度。使用定量实时PCR测量mRNA表达。使用ELISA试剂盒测量细胞培养上清液中的TNFα、IL-1β、IL-10和IGF-1。使用荧光素标记的大肠杆菌K-12生物颗粒评估吞噬功能。
轻度胰蛋白酶消化比振荡产生更高的产量和纯度。通过轻度胰蛋白酶消化分离的小胶质细胞似乎处于静止状态,具有分支形态。通过振荡分离的小胶质细胞表现出更异质的形态,包括具有圆形形状提示激活的细胞。与振荡相比,通过胰蛋白酶消化分离的小胶质细胞也具有较低的基线表型标志物(iNOS、CD86、CD206和精氨酸酶1)和较低水平的细胞因子(TNFα、IL-1β、IL-10和IGF-1)以及降低的吞噬能力。两种方法产生的小胶质细胞对各种刺激如IL-4、脂多糖(LPS)或干扰素-γ(IFNγ)均有反应。虽然基因表达和细胞因子释放的刺激模式通常相似,但在绝对反应方面也存在显著差异。LPS处理在通过轻度胰蛋白酶消化分离的小胶质细胞中诱导的TNFα和IL-10水平明显高于振荡分离的小胶质细胞。IFNγ在通过轻度胰蛋白酶消化获得的小胶质细胞中诱导的TNFα反应低于振荡分离的小胶质细胞。
我们的结果表明,用振荡方法分离小胶质细胞即使在基线时也可能诱导轻微激活,这可能会影响后续实验中的刺激反应。在选择原代小胶质细胞培养的分离方案时应谨慎并予以关注。