Center for Chronic Intestinal Failure, Department of Digestive System, St. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy.
Home Nutrition Support, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr;37(2):728-738. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of the study was to evaluate the applicability of the ESPEN 16-category clinical classification of chronic intestinal failure, based on patients' intravenous supplementation (IVS) requirements for energy and fluids, and to evaluate factors associated with those requirements.
ESPEN members were invited to participate through ESPEN Council representatives. Participating centers enrolled adult patients requiring home parenteral nutrition for chronic intestinal failure on March 1st 2015. The following patient data were recorded though a structured database: sex, age, body weight and height, intestinal failure mechanism, underlying disease, IVS volume and energy need.
Sixty-five centers from 22 countries enrolled 2919 patients with benign disease. One half of the patients were distributed in 3 categories of the ESPEN clinical classification. 9% of patients required only fluid and electrolyte supplementation. IVS requirement varied considerably according to the pathophysiological mechanism of intestinal failure. Notably, IVS volume requirement represented loss of intestinal function better than IVS energy requirement. A simplified 8 category classification of chronic intestinal failure was devised, based on two types of IVS (either fluid and electrolyte alone or parenteral nutrition admixture containing energy) and four categories of volume.
Patients' IVS requirements varied widely, supporting the need for a tool to homogenize patient categorization. This study has devised a novel, simplified eight category IVS classification for chronic intestinal failure that will prove useful in both the clinical and research setting when applied together with the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of the patient's intestinal failure.
本研究旨在评估基于患者静脉补充(IVS)能量和液体需求的 ESPEN 16 类慢性肠衰竭临床分类的适用性,并评估与这些需求相关的因素。
通过 ESPEN 理事会代表邀请 ESPEN 成员参与。参与中心于 2015 年 3 月 1 日招募需要家庭肠外营养治疗慢性肠衰竭的成年患者。通过结构化数据库记录以下患者数据:性别、年龄、体重和身高、肠衰竭机制、基础疾病、IVS 量和能量需求。
来自 22 个国家的 65 个中心共招募了 2919 例良性疾病患者。一半的患者分布在 ESPEN 临床分类的 3 个类别中。9%的患者仅需要补充液体和电解质。根据肠衰竭的病理生理机制,IVS 需求差异很大。值得注意的是,IVS 量需求比 IVS 能量需求更能代表肠功能的丧失。根据两种类型的 IVS(仅液体和电解质或含有能量的肠外营养混合物)和四个容量类别,设计了一种简化的慢性肠衰竭 8 类分类。
患者的 IVS 需求差异很大,这支持了需要一种工具来统一患者分类的需求。本研究设计了一种新的、简化的 8 类 IVS 分类,用于慢性肠衰竭,当与患者肠衰竭的潜在病理生理机制一起使用时,在临床和研究环境中都将非常有用。