General, Thoracic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Ceccarini Hospital, Riccione, Italy.
General, Thoracic and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Ceccarini Hospital, Riccione, Italy.
Int J Surg. 2017 Jul;43:101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.05.013. Epub 2017 May 5.
Numerous geriatric patients develop colorectal disease. Elderly patients are often considered high-risk surgical candidates. Enhanced recovery after surgery (E.R.A.S.) has been proven to be beneficial for patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of an ERAS protocol in older patients that underwent colorectal surgery compared to younger patients.
In the period between January 2010 to December 2015 a total of 589 patients underwent elective colorectal surgical interventions treated within the E.R.A.S pathway: 211 patients younger than 65 years, 175 patients aged from 66 years to 75 years, and 203 patients older than 75 years. End point of interest were postoperative complications, 90-day mortality, length of hospital stay and readmission within 30 days.
Significant differences between the three groups were observed for comorbidities (p:0.001); in particular older patients had significantly more diabetes, renal, cardiac, and respiratory diseases, ASA (p < 0.001), presence of malignancy (p < 0.001). However there were not differences between the groups in surgical procedures (p = 0.095), operative time (p = 0.823), anastomotic leakage (p = 0.960), hospital stay (p = 0.081), readmission rate (p = 0.904), 90-days mortality (p = 0.183) and morbidity (p = 0.973) in accordance with Clavien-Dindo classification. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that advanced age in E.R.A.S. pathway is not a predictive factor of morbidity, readmission within 30 days and 90-day mortality.
There was no significant difference in morbidity, 90-day mortality, length of stay or readmission rate in patients aged over 75 years compared with younger patients. Old age does not represent a contraindication to the implementation of the E.R.A.S protocol in patients that underwent colorectal surgery. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER ADD TO THE EXISTING LITERATURE?: In the literature there are not many studies that address the impact of older age in the treatment of colorectal disease in an ERAS program. The aging of the population raises new questions in the management of the colorectal surgery in the elderly. ERAS pathway has been proven to be beneficial for patients, which results in a reduction of postoperative morbidity. Compared to what is reported in the literature this study confirms that ERAS program in colorectal surgery can be applied in older patients with no significant difference in morbidity, 90-day mortality, length of stay or readmission rate compared with younger.
许多老年患者患有结直肠疾病。老年患者通常被认为是高危手术候选者。术后恢复加速(E.R.A.S.)已被证明对患者有益。本研究的目的是评估在接受结直肠手术的老年患者中与年轻患者相比,E.R.A.S.方案的结果。
在 2010 年 1 月至 2015 年 12 月期间,共有 589 名接受择期结直肠手术干预的患者接受了 E.R.A.S 治疗:211 名年龄小于 65 岁,175 名年龄在 66 岁至 75 岁之间,203 名年龄大于 75 岁。研究的终点是术后并发症、90 天死亡率、住院时间和 30 天内再入院。
三组之间在合并症方面存在显著差异(p:0.001);特别是老年患者患有糖尿病、肾脏、心脏和呼吸系统疾病、ASA(p<0.001)和恶性肿瘤的比例显著更高。然而,三组在手术程序(p=0.095)、手术时间(p=0.823)、吻合口漏(p=0.960)、住院时间(p=0.081)、再入院率(p=0.904)、90 天死亡率(p=0.183)和并发症(p=0.973)方面无差异,根据 Clavien-Dindo 分类。多变量逻辑回归分析表明,E.R.A.S.方案中年龄较大不是发病率、30 天内再入院和 90 天死亡率的预测因素。
与年轻患者相比,75 岁以上患者的发病率、90 天死亡率、住院时间或再入院率无显著差异。老年并不是在接受结直肠手术的患者中实施 E.R.A.S 方案的禁忌症。
这篇论文在现有文献中有什么新的贡献?:在文献中,很少有研究涉及 E.R.A.S.方案中年龄对结直肠疾病治疗的影响。人口老龄化在老年人结直肠手术管理中提出了新的问题。E.R.A.S.方案已被证明对患者有益,可降低术后发病率。与文献中的报道相比,本研究证实,E.R.A.S.方案在结直肠手术中可应用于老年患者,与年轻患者相比,在发病率、90 天死亡率、住院时间或再入院率方面无显著差异。