Slieker J, Frauche P, Jurt J, Addor V, Blanc C, Demartines Nicolas, Hübner M
Department of Visceral Surgery, University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Faculty of Medicine, UNIL University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Feb;32(2):215-221. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2691-6. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway includes recovery goals requiring active participation of the patients; this may be perceived as "aggressive" care in older patients. The aim of the present study was to assess whether ERAS was feasible and beneficial in older patients.
Since June 2011, all consecutive colorectal patients were included in an ERAS pathway and documented in a dedicated prospective database. This retrospective analysis included 513 patients, 311 younger patients (<70 years) and 202 older patients (≥70 years). Outcomes were adherence to the ERAS pathway, functional recovery, postoperative complications, and hospital stay.
Older patients had significantly more diabetes, malignancies, cardiac, and respiratory co-morbidities; both groups underwent similar surgical procedures. Overall adherence to the ERAS pathway was in median 78 % in younger and 74 % in older patients (P = 0.86). In older patients, urinary drains were kept longer (P = 0.001), and oral fluid intake was reduced from day 0 to day 3 (P < 0.001). There were no differences in mobilization and intake of nutritional supplements. Postoperative complications were similar for both comparative groups (51.5 vs. 46.6 %, P = 0.32). Median length of stay was 7 days (IQR 5-13) in older patients vs. 6 days (IQR 4-10) in the younger group (P = 0.001).
Adherence to the ERAS pathway was equally high in older patients. Despite more co-morbidities, older patients did not experience more complications. Recovery was similar and hospital stay was only 1 day longer than in younger patients. ERAS pathway is of value for all patients and does not need any adaptation for the elderly.
术后加速康复(ERAS)路径包含一些需要患者积极参与的康复目标;这在老年患者中可能被视为“激进”的治疗方式。本研究的目的是评估ERAS在老年患者中是否可行且有益。
自2011年6月起,所有连续的结直肠手术患者均纳入ERAS路径,并记录在一个专门的前瞻性数据库中。这项回顾性分析纳入了513例患者,其中311例年轻患者(<70岁)和202例老年患者(≥70岁)。观察指标包括对ERAS路径的依从性、功能恢复情况、术后并发症及住院时间。
老年患者患糖尿病、恶性肿瘤、心脏和呼吸系统合并症的比例显著更高;两组接受的手术操作相似。年轻患者对ERAS路径的总体依从性中位数为78%,老年患者为74%(P = 0.86)。老年患者的导尿管留置时间更长(P = 0.001),从第0天到第3天的口服液体摄入量减少(P < 0.001)。在活动和营养补充剂摄入方面没有差异。两个比较组的术后并发症相似(51.5%对46.6%,P = 0.32)。老年患者的中位住院时间为7天(四分位间距5 - 13天),而年轻组为6天(四分位间距4 - 10天)(P = 0.001)。
老年患者对ERAS路径的依从性同样较高。尽管合并症更多,但老年患者并未出现更多并发症。康复情况相似,住院时间仅比年轻患者长1天。ERAS路径对所有患者都有价值,无需针对老年人进行任何调整。