• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

展现最佳的自己(自拍):性别对Tinder上自拍垂直方向的影响。

Presenting Your Best Self(ie): The Influence of Gender on Vertical Orientation of Selfies on Tinder.

作者信息

Sedgewick Jennifer R, Flath Meghan E, Elias Lorin J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of SaskatchewanSaskatoon, SK, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 21;8:604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604
PMID:28484408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5399073/
Abstract

When taking a self-portrait or "selfie" to display in an online dating profile, individuals may intuitively manipulate the vertical camera angle to embody how they want to be perceived by the opposite sex. Concepts from evolutionary psychology and grounded cognition suggest that this manipulation can provide cues of physical height and impressions of power to the viewer which are qualities found to influence mate-selection. We predicted that men would orient selfies more often from below to appear taller (i.e., more powerful) than the viewer, and women, from an above perspective to appear shorter (i.e., less powerful). A content analysis was conducted which coded the vertical orientation of 557 selfies from profile pictures on the popular mobile dating application, Tinder. In general, selfies were commonly used by both men (54%) and women (90%). Consistent with our predictions, a gender difference emerged; men's selfies were angled significantly more often from below, whereas women's were angled more often from above. Our findings suggest that selfies presented in a mate-attraction context are intuitively or perhaps consciously selected to adhere to ideal mate qualities. Further discussion proposes that biological or individual differences may also facilitate vertical compositions of selfies.

摘要

在拍摄自拍照以展示在在线约会资料中时,人们可能会直观地调整相机的垂直角度,以体现他们希望被异性如何看待。进化心理学和具身认知的概念表明,这种调整可以向观看者提供身体高度的线索和权力印象,而这些特质被发现会影响择偶。我们预测,男性会更多地从下方拍摄自拍照,以使自己看起来比观看者更高(即更有权力),而女性则会从上方角度拍摄,以使自己看起来更矮(即权力较小)。我们对一款热门移动约会应用程序Tinder上资料照片中的557张自拍照的垂直方向进行了内容分析。总体而言,男性(54%)和女性(90%)都普遍使用自拍照。与我们的预测一致,出现了性别差异;男性的自拍照更多地从下方倾斜,而女性的自拍照更多地从上方倾斜。我们的研究结果表明,在吸引伴侣的情境中展示的自拍照是直观地或可能是有意识地选择的,以符合理想伴侣的特质。进一步的讨论提出,生物学或个体差异也可能促进自拍照的垂直构图。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba9/5399073/9e65c80541eb/fpsyg-08-00604-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba9/5399073/489a30898048/fpsyg-08-00604-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba9/5399073/9e65c80541eb/fpsyg-08-00604-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba9/5399073/489a30898048/fpsyg-08-00604-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3ba9/5399073/9e65c80541eb/fpsyg-08-00604-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Presenting Your Best Self(ie): The Influence of Gender on Vertical Orientation of Selfies on Tinder.展现最佳的自己(自拍):性别对Tinder上自拍垂直方向的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 21;8:604. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00604. eCollection 2017.
2
Nonverbal communication in selfies posted on Instagram: Another look at the effect of gender on vertical camera angle.Instagram 自拍照中的非言语交流:再看性别对垂直相机角度的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238588. eCollection 2020.
3
The Selfie Paradox: Nobody Seems to Like Them Yet Everyone Has Reasons to Take Them. An Exploration of Psychological Functions of Selfies in Self-Presentation.自拍悖论:似乎没人喜欢自拍,但每个人都有自拍的理由。对自拍在自我展示中的心理功能的探索。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 17;8:7. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00007. eCollection 2017.
4
Effects of taking selfies on women's self-objectification, mood, self-esteem, and social aggression toward female peers.自拍对女性自我客体化、情绪、自尊和对女性同伴的社会攻击的影响。
Body Image. 2021 Mar;36:193-200. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.11.011. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
5
Consistently Showing Your Best Side? Intra-individual Consistency in #Selfie Pose Orientation.始终展现出你最好的一面?#自拍姿势取向中的个体内部一致性。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 21;8:246. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00246. eCollection 2017.
6
Selfie Expectancies Among Adolescents: Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Assess Expectancies Toward Selfies Among Boys and Girls.青少年的自拍期望:一种评估男孩和女孩对自拍期望的工具的构建与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 May 29;9:839. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00839. eCollection 2018.
7
Romance 2.0 on Instagram! "What Type of Girlfriend Would You Date?".Instagram上的浪漫2.0!“你会和哪种类型的女孩约会?”
Evol Psychol. 2019 Jan-Mar;17(1):1474704919826845. doi: 10.1177/1474704919826845.
8
Self in Art/Self As Art: Museum Selfies As Identity Work.艺术中的自我/作为艺术的自我:博物馆自拍作为身份建构行为
Front Psychol. 2017 May 9;8:731. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00731. eCollection 2017.
9
How HEXACO Personality Traits Predict Different Selfie-Posting Behaviors among Adolescents and Young Adults.HEXACO人格特质如何预测青少年和年轻人不同的自拍发布行为。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jan 10;7:2080. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02080. eCollection 2016.
10
Beware of Selfies: The Impact of Photo Type on Impression Formation Based on Social Networking Profiles.小心自拍:照片类型对基于社交网络资料的印象形成的影响。
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 16;8:188. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00188. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Do selfies make women look slimmer? The effect of viewing angle on aesthetic and weight judgments of women's bodies.自拍能让女性看起来更苗条吗?视角对女性身体审美和体重判断的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 11;18(10):e0291987. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291987. eCollection 2023.
2
Is Dating Behavior in Digital Contexts Driven by Evolutionary Programs? A Selective Review.数字环境中的约会行为是由进化程序驱动的吗?选择性综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 28;13:678439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.678439. eCollection 2022.
3
Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification.

本文引用的文献

1
Height and Body Mass on the Mating Market : Associations With Number of Sex Partners and Extra-Pair Sex Among Heterosexual Men and Women Aged 18-65.婚恋市场中的身高与体重:与18至65岁异性恋男女的性伴侣数量及婚外性行为的关联
Evol Psychol. 2015 Sep 1;13(3):1474704915604563. doi: 10.1177/1474704915604563.
2
Composition in portraits: Selfies and wefies reveal similar biases in untrained modern youths and ancient masters.肖像画中的构图:自拍和多人自拍揭示了未经训练的现代年轻人与古代大师之间相似的偏好。
Laterality. 2017 May;22(3):279-293. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2016.1185108. Epub 2016 May 27.
3
Motor biases do not influence posing orientation in selfies.
对评论的回应:自我呈现修正的社会进化方法
Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Jan;51(1):85-100. doi: 10.1007/s10508-021-02170-x. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
4
Hunters and Gatherers of Pictures: Why Photography Has Become a Human Universal.图像的猎人与采集者:摄影为何成为人类共有的现象。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 8;12:654474. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654474. eCollection 2021.
5
Nonverbal communication in selfies posted on Instagram: Another look at the effect of gender on vertical camera angle.Instagram 自拍照中的非言语交流:再看性别对垂直相机角度的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 11;15(9):e0238588. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238588. eCollection 2020.
6
Swiping right: face perception in the age of Tinder.向右滑动:Tinder时代的面部感知。
Heliyon. 2019 Dec 2;5(12):e02949. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02949. eCollection 2019 Dec.
运动偏差不会影响自拍中的摆姿方向。
Laterality. 2017 Jan;22(1):49-59. doi: 10.1080/1357650X.2015.1109649. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
4
Height and reproductive success in a cohort of british men.一组英国男性的身高与生殖成功率
Hum Nat. 2002 Dec;13(4):473-91. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1004-7.
5
Selfie and the city: a world-wide, large, and ecologically valid database reveals a two-pronged side bias in naïve self-portraits.自拍与城市:一个全球范围的、大型的且具有生态效度的数据库揭示了在未经训练的自拍照中存在的双重侧面偏差。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 27;10(4):e0124999. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124999. eCollection 2015.
6
Facial width-to-height ratio predicts self-reported dominance and aggression in males and females, but a measure of masculinity does not.面部宽高比可预测男性和女性的自我报告的支配力和攻击性,但不能预测男性气概的衡量标准。
Biol Lett. 2014 Oct;10(10):20140729. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0729.
7
Increased facial width-to-height ratio and perceived dominance in the faces of the UK's leading business leaders.英国顶尖商业领袖面部的宽高比增加与感知到的主导性
Br J Psychol. 2014 May;105(2):153-61. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12035. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
8
Predicting romantic interest and decisions in the very early stages of mate selection: standards, accuracy, and sex differences.预测择偶早期阶段的浪漫兴趣和决策:标准、准确性及性别差异。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Apr;40(4):540-50. doi: 10.1177/0146167213519481. Epub 2014 Feb 5.
9
Judging a man by the width of his face: the role of facial ratios and dominance in mate choice at speed-dating events.以脸宽评判男人:在速配活动中,面部比例和支配地位在配偶选择中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Mar;25(3):806-11. doi: 10.1177/0956797613511823. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
10
Weighing the impact of obesity on female reproductive function and fertility.衡量肥胖对女性生殖功能和生育能力的影响。
Nutr Rev. 2013 Oct;71 Suppl 1(0 1):S3-8. doi: 10.1111/nure.12056.