• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Call for an Evidence-Based Consensus on Outcome Reporting in Tinnitus Intervention Studies.

作者信息

Londero Alain, Hall Deborah A

机构信息

Service ORL et CCF, Hôpital Européen G. Pompidou, Paris, France.

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Apr 21;4:42. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00042. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2017.00042
PMID:28484698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5399023/
Abstract
摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a5/5399023/9e89b6318393/fmed-04-00042-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a5/5399023/9e89b6318393/fmed-04-00042-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78a5/5399023/9e89b6318393/fmed-04-00042-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Call for an Evidence-Based Consensus on Outcome Reporting in Tinnitus Intervention Studies.呼吁就耳鸣干预研究中的结果报告达成基于证据的共识。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2017 Apr 21;4:42. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00042. eCollection 2017.
2
Defining Symptom Concepts in Chronic Subjective Tinnitus: Web-Based Discussion Forum Study.慢性主观性耳鸣症状概念的界定：基于网络的讨论论坛研究
Interact J Med Res. 2020 Jan 7;9(1):e14446. doi: 10.2196/14446.
3
Diagnostic Criteria for Somatosensory Tinnitus: A Delphi Process and Face-to-Face Meeting to Establish Consensus.躯体感觉性耳鸣诊断标准：德尔菲法和面对面会议以达成共识。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518796403. doi: 10.1177/2331216518796403.
4
Development of a Core Outcome Set and Minimum Reporting Set for intervention studies in growth restriction in the NEwbOrN (COSNEON): study protocol for a Delphi study.新生儿生长受限干预研究核心结局集和最低报告集的制定（COSNEON）：德尔菲研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Aug 17;20(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3588-9.
5
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in basal cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.制定基底细胞癌临床试验的核心结局指标集：一项文献系统综述及运用德尔菲法确定核心结局指标集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Oct 23;18(1):490. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2244-5.
6
Core Competencies in Evidence-Based Practice for Health Professionals: Consensus Statement Based on a Systematic Review and Delphi Survey.卫生专业人员循证实践的核心能力：基于系统评价和德尔菲调查的共识声明。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Jun 1;1(2):e180281. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.0281.
7
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in squamous cell carcinoma: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.制定鳞状细胞癌临床试验的核心结局指标集：文献系统评价及采用德尔菲法确定核心结局指标集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jul 12;18(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2069-2.
8
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in facial aging: study protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey.面部衰老临床试验核心结局集的制定：一项文献系统评价及使用德尔菲法确定核心结局集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Aug 1;18(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2104-3.
9
Cauda Equina Syndrome Core Outcome Set (CESCOS): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.马尾综合征核心结局集（CESCOS）：用于研究的国际患者和医疗保健专业人员共识。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 10;15(1):e0225907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225907. eCollection 2020.
10
Current-reported outcome domains in studies of adults with a focus on the treatment of tinnitus: protocol for a systematic review.当前针对成年耳鸣患者治疗研究中报告的结果领域：一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 11;5(11):e009091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009091.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing Clustering Methods Applied to Tinnitus within a Bootstrapped and Diagnostic-Driven Semi-Supervised Framework.在自展法和诊断驱动的半监督框架内比较应用于耳鸣的聚类方法
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 28;13(4):572. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040572.
2
Content validity of the tinnitus outcome questionnaire for sound management.耳鸣管理效果问卷的内容效度。
PLoS One. 2021 May 6;16(5):e0251244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251244. eCollection 2021.
3
All for One and One for All? - Examining Convergent Validity and Responsiveness of the German Versions of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI).

本文引用的文献

1
Dimensions of tinnitus-related complaints reported by patients and their significant others: protocol for a systematic review.患者及其重要他人报告的耳鸣相关主诉的维度：一项系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 8;6(10):e009171. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009171.
2
Exploring methods the for selection and integration of stakeholder views in the development of core outcome sets: a case study in reconstructive breast surgery.探索在核心结局集制定过程中选择和整合利益相关者观点的方法：一项乳房重建手术的案例研究
Trials. 2016 Sep 23;17(1):463. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1591-y.
3
Evaluation of upper extremity neurorehabilitation using technology: a European Delphi consensus study within the EU COST Action Network on Robotics for Neurorehabilitation.
人人为我，我为人人？——检验耳鸣问卷（TQ）、耳鸣障碍量表（THI）和耳鸣功能指数（TFI）德文版的收敛效度和反应性
Front Psychol. 2021 Mar 12;12:596037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.596037. eCollection 2021.
4
One Size Does Not Fit All: Developing Common Standards for Outcomes in Early-Phase Clinical Trials of Sound-, Psychology-, and Pharmacology-Based Interventions for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus in Adults.一刀切并不适合所有人：为成人慢性主观性耳鸣的基于声音、心理学和药理学的早期临床试验制定共同结局标准。
Trends Hear. 2019 Jan-Dec;23:2331216518824827. doi: 10.1177/2331216518824827.
5
The COMiT'ID Study: Developing Core Outcome Domains Sets for Clinical Trials of Sound-, Psychology-, and Pharmacology-Based Interventions for Chronic Subjective Tinnitus in Adults.COMiT'ID 研究：为成人慢性主观性耳鸣的声音、心理学和药理学干预临床试验开发核心结局域集。
Trends Hear. 2018 Jan-Dec;22:2331216518814384. doi: 10.1177/2331216518814384.
6
Recruiting and retaining participants in e-Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: Evaluating the COMiT'ID study.电子德尔菲法调查中核心结局集开发的参与者招募和保留：评估 COMiT'ID 研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 30;13(7):e0201378. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201378. eCollection 2018.
7
Defining and evaluating novel procedures for involving patients in Core Outcome Set research: creating a meaningful long list of candidate outcome domains.定义和评估让患者参与核心结局集研究的新方法：创建一份有意义的候选结局领域长清单。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Mar 2;4:8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0091-5. eCollection 2018.
8
Designing Clinical Trials for Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions for Tinnitus.设计临床试验评估耳鸣干预措施的有效性。
Trends Hear. 2017 Jan-Dec;21:2331216517736689. doi: 10.1177/2331216517736689.
利用技术评估上肢神经康复：欧盟神经康复机器人技术成本行动网络内的一项欧洲德尔菲共识研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2016 Sep 23;13(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12984-016-0192-z.
4
Management of congenital quantitative fibrinogen disorders: a Delphi consensus.先天性定量纤维蛋白原异常的管理：德尔菲共识
Haemophilia. 2016 Nov;22(6):898-905. doi: 10.1111/hae.13061. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
5
Report from the fourth international consensus meeting to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis clinical trials (HOME initiative).特应性皮炎临床试验协调核心结局指标的第四次国际共识会议报告（HOME 倡议）。
Br J Dermatol. 2016 Jul;175(1):69-79. doi: 10.1111/bjd.14773. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
6
Systematic review of outcome domains and instruments used in clinical trials of tinnitus treatments in adults.成人耳鸣治疗临床试验中使用的结局领域和工具的系统评价。
Trials. 2016 Jun 1;17(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1399-9.
7
A systematic review of the reporting of tinnitus prevalence and severity.耳鸣患病率及严重程度报告的系统评价
Hear Res. 2016 Jul;337:70-9. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 May 28.
8
A Systematic Review of Eligibility and Outcomes in Tinnitus Trials: Reassessment of Tinnitus Guideline.耳鸣试验的纳入标准和结果的系统评价：耳鸣指南的重新评估
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Jan;154(1):24-32. doi: 10.1177/0194599815608160. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population.耳鸣功能指数（TFI）的心理测量特性：在英国研究志愿者群体中的评估。
Hear Res. 2016 May;335:220-235. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2015.09.009. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
10
Treatment of tinnitus.耳鸣的治疗。
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Oct;23(5):361-8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000185.