Suppr超能文献

血浆无细胞游离 DNA 完整性加循环肿瘤细胞:乳腺癌无远处转移的潜在生物标志物。

Plasma cell-free DNA integrity plus circulating tumor cells: a potential biomarker of no distant metastasis breast cancer.

出版信息

Neoplasma. 2017;64(4):611-618. doi: 10.4149/neo_2017_417.

Abstract

Cell-free DNA integrity (cfDI) is a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in breast cancer. However, no specific study has evaluated the diagnostic ability of cfDI in patients with no distant metastasis breast cancer (no-MBC) and benign breast tumor (BBT) to date. We assessed the plasma cfDI of 84 patients with no-MBC and 30 patients with BBT using quantitative PCR and compared it with circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153). The no-MBC group had significantly lower mean cfDI (0.58) than the BBT group (0.74, p = 0.004). Subgroup analysis showed that decreased cfDI seem to be associated with risk factors such as age 14% (mean cfDI = 0.57), tumor size > 2 cm (mean cfDI = 0.58), and positive lymph node status (mean cfDI = 0.56), but had no statistical significance. McNemar's test suggested that cfDI had stronger diagnostic power than CTCs, cfDNA concentration, or CA153 (p < 0.001). Spearman's rho showed that the correlation coefficient between cfDI and CTCs was 0.278 (p = 0.04) in the no-MBC group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis also suggested that cfDI was superior to CTCs or CA153. Combined with CTCs, cfDI reduced the false positive rate from 50% to 10.71% and increased the area under the curve value from 0.66 to 0.68. Our results suggest that cfDI is a potential diagnostic biomarker of no-MBC. Using cfDI and CTCs as a combined diagnostic tool for no-MBC could improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity but more samples will be needed.

摘要

无远处转移乳腺癌(no-MBC)和良性乳腺肿瘤(BBT)患者的游离 DNA 完整性(cfDI)作为一种有前途的诊断和预后生物标志物,目前尚无专门研究对其进行评估。我们使用定量 PCR 检测了 84 例 no-MBC 患者和 30 例 BBT 患者的血浆 cfDI,并将其与循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和糖链抗原 153(CA153)进行了比较。no-MBC 组的平均 cfDI(0.58)明显低于 BBT 组(0.74,p = 0.004)。亚组分析显示,cfDI 降低似乎与年龄 14%(平均 cfDI = 0.57)、肿瘤大小>2 cm(平均 cfDI = 0.58)和阳性淋巴结状态(平均 cfDI = 0.56)等危险因素相关,但无统计学意义。McNemar 检验提示 cfDI 的诊断效能强于 CTC、cfDNA 浓度或 CA153(p<0.001)。Spearman 相关系数显示,no-MBC 组 cfDI 与 CTCs 的相关系数为 0.278(p=0.04)。受试者工作特征曲线分析也提示 cfDI 优于 CTCs 或 CA153。cfDI 与 CTCs 联合使用可将假阳性率从 50%降低至 10.71%,曲线下面积从 0.66 增加至 0.68。我们的研究结果表明,cfDI 是 no-MBC 的潜在诊断生物标志物。使用 cfDI 和 CTCs 作为 no-MBC 的联合诊断工具可能会提高诊断的敏感性和特异性,但需要更多的样本。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验