• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

水合氯醛镇静在儿科眼科手术镇静中的安全性和疗效。

Safety and Efficacy of Chloral Hydrate Sedation in Paediatric Sedation for Ophthalmic Procedures.

机构信息

Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

出版信息

Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017 Apr;46(4):138-144.

PMID:28485461
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Chloral hydrate (CH) sedation is routinely used in paediatric ophthalmic examination in Singapore as an alternative to examination under general anaesthesia. Despite CH's traditionally high success rates and relatively low rate of adverse events, there is little data on its safety and efficacy as a sedative for ophthalmic procedures in an Asian population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed, including children who underwent CH sedation at the Singapore National Eye Centre from January 2012 to January 2015. Participants were given an initial dose of CH and a top-up dose if required. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed on data collected.

RESULTS

CH sedation was successful in 144 of 153 children (94.1%). Of the 20 (13.0%) who required a top-up dose, 4 failed to sedate. The mean sedation onset was 29.4 minutes (SD: 24.3) and mean sedation duration was 56.5 minutes (SD: 24.0), with more than a third lasting more than 1 hour. The age of children, rather than initial dose of CH, was more relevant in determining success of sedation. Children who were >6 years old were 20.3 times more likely to fail sedation than those aged <2 years. During sedation, depression in the heart rate and a transient reduction of oxygen saturation was documented. All children recovered well post-sedation.

CONCLUSION

CH is a very useful sedative for paediatric ophthalmic procedures, especially in younger children. Children over 4 years old were more likely to fail sedation and require top-up doses. Alternative means of sedation may need to be considered in these cases.

摘要

介绍

水合氯醛(CH)镇静在新加坡的儿科眼科检查中经常被用作全身麻醉的替代方法。尽管 CH 传统上具有很高的成功率和相对较低的不良事件发生率,但关于其作为亚洲人群眼科手术镇静剂的安全性和有效性的数据很少。

材料和方法

对 2012 年 1 月至 2015 年 1 月在新加坡国家眼科中心接受 CH 镇静的儿童进行了回顾性图表审查。参与者给予初始剂量的 CH,如果需要,给予补充剂量。对收集的数据进行了单变量和多变量分析。

结果

CH 镇静在 153 名儿童中的 144 名(94.1%)中成功。在需要补充剂量的 20 名儿童中,有 4 名未镇静。平均镇静开始时间为 29.4 分钟(SD:24.3),平均镇静持续时间为 56.5 分钟(SD:24.0),超过三分之一的时间超过 1 小时。儿童的年龄而不是 CH 的初始剂量与镇静成功更相关。年龄>6 岁的儿童镇静失败的可能性是年龄<2 岁的儿童的 20.3 倍。在镇静期间,记录了心率下降和氧饱和度短暂降低。所有儿童镇静后均恢复良好。

结论

CH 是儿科眼科手术非常有用的镇静剂,尤其是在年幼的儿童中。年龄超过 4 岁的儿童更有可能镇静失败并需要补充剂量。在这些情况下,可能需要考虑其他镇静方法。

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Chloral Hydrate Sedation in Paediatric Sedation for Ophthalmic Procedures.水合氯醛镇静在儿科眼科手术镇静中的安全性和疗效。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2017 Apr;46(4):138-144.
2
The safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation for pediatric ophthalmic procedures: a retrospective review.水合氯醛用于小儿眼科手术镇静的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014 May-Jun;51(3):154-9. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20140311-01. Epub 2014 Mar 18.
3
Chloral Hydrate Administered by a Dedicated Sedation Service Can Be Used Safely and Effectively for Pediatric Ophthalmic Examination.氯醛合用于专科镇静服务可安全有效地用于儿科眼科检查。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;192:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 26.
4
A comparison of oral chloral hydrate and sublingual midazolam sedation for echocardiogram in children.口服水合氯醛与舌下含服咪达唑仑用于儿童超声心动图镇静的比较。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2008 Oct;91 Suppl 3:S45-52.
5
Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate for procedural sedation in paediatric ophthalmology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.水合氯醛用于小儿眼科手术镇静的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;101(10):1423-1430. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-309449. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
6
Utilisation of an outpatient sedation unit in paediatric ophthalmology: safety and effectiveness of chloral hydrate in 1509 sedation episodes.门诊镇静单位在小儿眼科中的应用:水合氯醛镇静 1509 例的安全性和有效性。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2013 Nov;97(11):1437-42. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303818. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
7
Pentobarbital vs chloral hydrate for sedation of children undergoing MRI: efficacy and recovery characteristics.用于接受磁共振成像(MRI)检查的儿童镇静的戊巴比妥与水合氯醛:疗效及恢复特征
Paediatr Anaesth. 2004 Jul;14(7):589-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01243.x.
8
Comparison of sedation by intranasal dexmedetomidine and oral chloral hydrate for pediatric ophthalmic examination.鼻内给予右美托咪定与口服水合氯醛用于小儿眼科检查的镇静效果比较。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2017 Jun;27(6):629-636. doi: 10.1111/pan.13148. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
9
Sleep deprivation did not enhance the success rate of chloral hydrate sedation for non-invasive procedural sedation in pediatric patients.睡眠剥夺并未提高水合氯醛镇静在儿科患者非侵入性程序镇静中的成功率。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0245338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245338. eCollection 2021.
10
Safety and efficacy of chloral hydrate sedation in children undergoing echocardiography.水合氯醛镇静用于接受超声心动图检查儿童的安全性和有效性。
J Pediatr. 1996 Aug;129(2):287-91. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70256-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of Chloral Hydrate on Brain MRI in Children with Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability Comparing with Normal Intelligence: Single Tertiary Center Experience.水合氯醛对发育迟缓/智力残疾儿童脑部MRI的有效性与正常智力儿童的比较:单一三级中心经验
Children (Basel). 2021 Nov 29;8(12):1097. doi: 10.3390/children8121097.
2
Is Orally Administered Pentobarbital a Safe and Effective Alternative to Chloral Hydrate for Pediatric Procedural Sedation?口服戊巴比妥对于儿科操作镇静来说,是水合氯醛安全有效的替代药物吗?
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;23(6):460-465. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-23.6.460.