Jones Jeremy C, Renfro Lindsay A, Al-Shamsi Humaid O, Schrock Alexa B, Rankin Andrew, Zhang Ben Y, Kasi Pashtoon M, Voss Jesse S, Leal Alexis D, Sun James, Ross Jeffrey, Ali Siraj M, Hubbard Joleen M, Kipp Benjamin R, McWilliams Robert R, Kopetz Scott, Wolff Robert A, Grothey Axel
Jeremy C. Jones, Lindsay A. Renfro, Ben Y. Zhang, Pashtoon M. Kasi, Jesse S. Voss, Alexis D. Leal, Joleen M. Hubbard, Benjamin R. Kipp, Robert R. McWilliams, and Axel Grothey, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Humaid O. Al-Shamsi, Scott Kopetz, and Robert A. Wolff, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; and Alexa B. Schrock, Andrew Rankin, James Sun, Jeffrey Ross, and Siraj M. Ali, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Aug 10;35(23):2624-2630. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4394. Epub 2017 May 9.
Purpose Molecular diagnostic testing has become an integral part of the evaluation of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Expanded mutational testing, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), often identifies mutations with unclear clinical or prognostic implications. One such example is BRAF mutations that occur outside of codon 600 ( BRAF mutations). Methods We conducted this multicenter, retrospective cohort study to characterize the clinical, pathologic, and survival implications of BRAF mutations in metastatic CRC. We pooled patients in whom BRAF mutations were identified from NGS databases at three large molecular genetics reference laboratories. Results A total of 9,643 patients with metastatic CRC underwent NGS testing. We identified 208 patients with BRAF mutations, which occurred in 2.2% of all patients tested and accounted for 22% of all BRAF mutations identified. Cancers with BRAF mutations, compared with cancers with V600E BRAF ( BRAF) mutations, were found in patients who were significantly younger (58 v 68 years, respectively), fewer female patients (46% v 65%, respectively), and patients who had fewer high-grade tumors (13% v 64%, respectively) or right-sided primary tumors (36% v 81%, respectively). Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic CRC compared with those with both BRAF-mutant and wild-type BRAF metastatic CRC (60.7 v 11.4 v 43.0 months, respectively; P < .001). In multivariable analysis, BRAF mutation was independently associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.18; P < .001). Conclusion BRAF mutations occur in approximately 2.2% of patients with metastatic CRC and define a clinically distinct subtype of CRC with an excellent prognosis.
目的 分子诊断检测已成为转移性结直肠癌(CRC)患者评估的一个组成部分。扩展的突变检测,如下一代测序(NGS),常常能识别出临床或预后意义不明确的突变。一个这样的例子就是发生在密码子600以外的BRAF突变(BRAF突变)。方法 我们开展了这项多中心回顾性队列研究,以明确BRAF突变在转移性CRC中的临床、病理及生存意义。我们汇总了在三个大型分子遗传学参考实验室的NGS数据库中识别出BRAF突变的患者。结果 共有9643例转移性CRC患者接受了NGS检测。我们识别出208例BRAF突变患者,其在所有检测患者中占2.2%,在所有识别出的BRAF突变中占22%。与具有V600E BRAF(BRAF)突变的癌症相比,BRAF突变的癌症患者明显更年轻(分别为58岁和68岁)、女性患者更少(分别为46%和65%)、高级别肿瘤患者更少(分别为13%和64%)或右侧原发性肿瘤患者更少(分别为36%和81%)。BRAF突变的转移性CRC患者的中位总生存期明显长于BRAF突变和野生型BRAF转移性CRC患者(分别为60.7个月、11.4个月和43.0个月;P <.001)。在多变量分析中,BRAF突变与总生存期改善独立相关(风险比,0.18;P <.001)。结论 BRAF突变发生在约2.2%的转移性CRC患者中,并定义了一种具有良好预后的临床上独特的CRC亚型。